Jonny Deth wrote:
You're telling me you've never heard a local female soul singer with a better voice than Aguilera??
Sure I have, so what? If no one knows who they are, and they aren't selling themselves non-stop so that this changes, then what value is it, that they may sing better than Christina? Additionally, she has the WHOLE PACKAGE as an entertainer and vocalist. I know some girls that sing better than she does... TECHNICALLY, but they may not have the soul in their voice that she does, or they may not dance as well as she does, or entertain as well, or be in as good a shape physically as she is. It is difficult to find EVERYTHING in one package, no matter what you seem to believe. Raw talent, does not equate to STAR POWER. The Grammys, is not a TALENT CONTEST, it is an AWARDS show, for marking what they refer to as... "Outstanding achievements in the music industry"
We all know however, that it is a marketing tool ultimately.
Jonny Deth wrote:
I think you're just getting swept up in her glory runs and intense emotion.
Yeah, I do get swept up in that. Powerful emotion is usually part of selling a song. This even holds true in Opera.

Jonny Deth wrote:
Seriously, if you can't hear it, you're in the wrong business
You may be right. I don't know much about singing. I'm lucky if they let me sing in the shower.

Jonny Deth wrote:
In terms of vocal quality though, her voice has some major weaknesses
Like any singer's does. And what is weakness to one person is a strength to another. Take "Pink" for example, since you bring her up. She has a powerful voice, but it is also very masculine and course. Course sounds good on women, to some people, but not to others.
Barbara Streisand is another one, who has a tremendous range and power, but has a masculine edge to her voice, a certain harshness. Then you have Celine Dion, who is without doubt, one of the great female vocalists, and has both range and power, but she has a nasally voice, that grates on me at times.
And I never said that Christina was one of the BEST vocalists in the world. What I said, was that she is an "exceptional" singer. And she is. She sings powerfully, accurately and with proper emotion.
Jonny Deth wrote:
What I dislike about Taylor is, the industry is attempting to use her to get country to crossover into the pop market and already used Miley Cyrus to get the ball rolling. As it is, both are just rich kids that were bought into the business.
Well, you are wrong on both counts actually. Taylor Swift got her parents to move to Nashville, and she pounded the streets, just like anyone else. She got plenty of rejections before someone took a chance on her.
As to Miley Cyrus, her dad had what? One hit? Two technically, I guess, that were really big. "Achy Breaky Heart" and "Some Gave All". that hardly makes him a powerhouse in the music industry. When he was pushing hard to help Miley get the "Hannah Montana" gig, Disney at first rejected Miley. But after a year or more of searching, they just couldn't find the right combination to fit that role, so they reluctantly offered it to her. She ran with it, did amazingly well, and the rest is history. I am sure Disney couldn't imagine anyone else as Hannah Montana now, but they sure did envision someone else back then!
And connections being important?
This holds true for ANY endeavor in life. It's always WHO YOU KNOW, that helps separate you from the pack. If you don't "know" someone... you work to change that, by hitting the pavement, until they put a face to the music, and CAN'T forget you.
But you still have to have talent, and all these people have talent.
Jonny Deth wrote:
So to praise the likes of Beyonce, Aguilera, Swift, Timberlake etc. is a huge insult to someone like myself. I do more in a day than those kids do in a week.
That's doubtful. These people don't suffer exhaustion for no reason. They aren't always making it up. Some get hospitalized for it. Lady GaGa was one, just recently. The bigger you are, the more work the money behind you is expecting, to keep the ball rolling, to capture the MOMENTUM and turn it into SALES. You are flown all over the world, in the studio working on the next album, doing concerts, and maybe even movies and TV appearances, being given interviews all the time, then repeating it in the next city... the next state... the next country.
They work really hard, and sometimes pay a big price for what is demanded of them.
Jonny Deth wrote:
They're literally turning in someone elses homework and taking credit for it.
Homework? Who's homework are they doing? Yours? They get permission to license a song or two, and they put it on an album, and if that album goes platinum many times over, the songwriter may get several hundred thousand dollars, just for having ONE SONG on that album. Where is the stealing coming into play? The ripping someone off, by turning in their homework? Are you talking about black artists of the past? Yes, that happened then. But not now.
Jonny Deth wrote:
How someone can say they don't understand what song writing has to do with winning a granny is the dumbest fcking thing I've ever heard!
No, what I said was... That I didn't understand why you felt that songwriting was a PREREQUISITE for someone winning a Grammy. Songwriters win Grammys. So do Singers and entertainers. Not all singers write songs, and not all songwriters sing and perform well. These are very different skill sets, and not everyone possesses ALL in one package.
But that doesn 't mean we can't honor a great entertainer, a great vocalist, or a great songwriter. Many of the greatest songwriters of all time, were only nominally.... singers. After writing many hits for others, sure... they put out their own records if they could sing a little... but... that song was generally not going to go as far, as if Barbara Streisand or Dionne Warwick sang them.
Most of the music industry is a collaborative effort.
Jonny Deth wrote:
Singing is overrated, hundreds of millions of good singers out there.
But to write a great song, sing that song and be part of the creation process every step of the way...pop stars are frauds and do NONE of that!
They are not frauds merely because their talent lies more in singing and dancing, than WRITING. Chances are those WRITERS do not sing and dance anywhere near how the one on stage does. When a great singer and dancer entertains us with a great song... that is that much more in sales that song will generate. It's not called the "Music HOBBY" but the "Music BUSINESS". People submitting their songs to big name artists, are maintaining a CAREER, not just a love of doing something. It is also their LIVLIHOOD!
But there are plenty of stars who do it all.
Michael Jackson was one of those. He wrote MANY of the songs he made into hits. Billie Jean, he wrote starting from that famous bass line. He just made up the bass line, and went from there. Quincy Jones, Michael's producer, hated the song, and tried to get Michael to drop it from the album. I guess fortunately, Michael fought to keep it in, and it became one of the biggest pop hits of all time.
Jonny Deth wrote:
In the end, they're just spoiled brats with mediocre talent, your lovely Aguilera included.
My understanding is that Christina came from a relatively poor family. That she is a pretty down to Earth girl, according to her family, and also that success has not stopped her from being close to them, and remembering her roots.
Jonny Deth wrote:
I would still bet that most of these kids are the children of powerful people in the business and in many cases, it's withheld from public knowledge and always will be.
Connections afford someone OPPORTUNITIES, not signed CONTRACTS! Britney Spears was not wealthy, neither Christina or many, many others. Many poor and middle class people MAKE IT in the music business. Maybe even MORE of them do, and if true, it should be obvious why... because they have MORE DRIVE, and MORE REASON to need to succeed, than those born into privilege, of which you speak.
You have a jaded and even unrealistic view of this business. You are taking "some" legitimate points, to irrational extremes.
*´¨)
¸.•´¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.•` ¤ CRAIG MAXIM
Facebook: http://facebook.com/craigmaxim
MySpace: http://myspace.com/craigmaxim
Reverb Nation: http://reverbnation.com/craigmaxim
¸.•´¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.•` ¤ CRAIG MAXIM
Facebook: http://facebook.com/craigmaxim
MySpace: http://myspace.com/craigmaxim
Reverb Nation: http://reverbnation.com/craigmaxim