Captain Scott wrote:generic? ok that's interesting. Ok, so what is your answer? No fair calling generic without supplying another answer.
Nothing different that will distinguish their sound from others. They're non-compatible, imo, as I mentioned IN MY PREVIOUS POST.
Captain Scott wrote:(PS for being generic, that whole band is pretty good to me)
Personal opinion. I disagree, but I respect it. It looks like a cool supergroup to me, but doesn't sound so "super."
Captain Scott wrote:And if Weiland's vocals are damaged, I can bet that someone makes something to stick on his vocal effects chain that makes him sound good.
Performing live is the artist's true test. If one can't pull it off half the time (a little reverb in the mic is alright), then the test has been failed.
Captain Scott wrote:When I go see a band and the vocals are 100% naked, I am notoriously bored by the lack of imagination. Why even use electric instruments? Ya'll going acoustic next? lol
Again, personal opinion. I think that if your vocals (on their own) can have a good impact on me, it's different and it's not "generic," then I have listened to true talent.
And for the record, you can play anything acoustically and it will still sound good. You gotta know how to play it though.