I understand the situation, but fail to see the problem--based on what you say, anyway. After all, you concede this fellow has better equipment, is willing to banter at gigs (without dominating) and, most telling...
If you sound better--isn't that the main goal?--80 percent of the time, rather than worrying about his growing role and thinking of ways to limit his influence, I'd be looking for ways to improve that other 20 percent. Heck, most bands would kill to add harmonies that make them sound better 80 percent of the time. Why would you want to suppress that?
C'mon--it's virtually impossible to be totally objective when discussing your own abilities--although you might be right (dunno, haven't heard you). Part of what you describe could simply be the mix. If you want real objectivity, do what RG suggests and ask for everyone's input. If you really do have the best, strongest voice, that will come out. If it turns out he sounds better on certain tunes (by consensus), live w/ it. Share the wealth. Best sound wins.
It sounds like your real concern is that this fellow is becoming more instrumental/significant within the band...perhaps at your expense. Rather than worrying about how to limit his influence, work toward harnessing it and continuing to improve your sound. After all, he has far more experience than you, and by your own admission, you do sound better w/ him. I'd stop worrying about the potential negatives and embrace the obvious positives. But that's just how I would approach it.
rockin1180272 wrote:My question is - when they DO harmonize we sound good 80% of the time - so should I just allow it? Should we just allow what sounds best despite the fact I never asked for it?
If you sound better--isn't that the main goal?--80 percent of the time, rather than worrying about his growing role and thinking of ways to limit his influence, I'd be looking for ways to improve that other 20 percent. Heck, most bands would kill to add harmonies that make them sound better 80 percent of the time. Why would you want to suppress that?
rockin1180272 wrote:Also - totally objectively - I have a better stronger voice, a definite lead vocal voice, that can really get the rock n roll sound - sometimes when they harmonize in the parts I normally belt out - it actually brings down my vocal power/resonance/vibrato coming out of the speakers.
C'mon--it's virtually impossible to be totally objective when discussing your own abilities--although you might be right (dunno, haven't heard you). Part of what you describe could simply be the mix. If you want real objectivity, do what RG suggests and ask for everyone's input. If you really do have the best, strongest voice, that will come out. If it turns out he sounds better on certain tunes (by consensus), live w/ it. Share the wealth. Best sound wins.
It sounds like your real concern is that this fellow is becoming more instrumental/significant within the band...perhaps at your expense. Rather than worrying about how to limit his influence, work toward harnessing it and continuing to improve your sound. After all, he has far more experience than you, and by your own admission, you do sound better w/ him. I'd stop worrying about the potential negatives and embrace the obvious positives. But that's just how I would approach it.