This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#213100 by Planetguy
Wed Apr 24, 2013 1:52 pm
GLENNY J wrote:
Have a good day buddy, And remember if you ever get a chance to stop by... PLEASE DO!


thanks for the invite....we were in NYC last week but that's a lot of geography between there and you. might be heading thru your parts end of august.

getting ready to head out on tour next week to arizona, new mexico, and colorado.

likewise and back atcha...if you're ever passing thru mid-missouri be sure to let me know.

#213195 by Slacker G
Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:29 pm
We need a new Godwin's Law - for non geeks it means the first person to bring Hitler into a political argument loses.


Is this PC?

How can you put on the blinders and not associate this regime with Hitlers movement when they are following the exact methodology that the Nazi regime used to deceive the German people and control them?

What is wrong with calling a spade a spade?

#213203 by Kramerguy
Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:22 pm
J-HALEY wrote:
Kramerguy wrote:
J-HALEY wrote: You atheist promote the MURDER of unborn children and you call religion barbaric. Do you see the irony here? :shock:



I'm not an athiest, and additionally, you have no clue what my views on abortion are. You assume way too much, and that alone causes you to make a fool of yourself.


If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's probably a duck LOL! :lol:


...And assumption is the mother of all fvckups :lol:

#213211 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:49 pm
Slacker G wrote:
We need a new Godwin's Law - for non geeks it means the first person to bring Hitler into a political argument loses.


Is this PC?

How can you put on the blinders and not associate this regime with Hitlers movement when they are following the exact methodology that the Nazi regime used to deceive the German people and control them?

What is wrong with calling a spade a spade?



Godwin's law applies especially to inappropriate, inordinate, or hyperbolic comparisons of other situations (or one's opponent) with Nazis.

Godwin's law itself can be abused as a distraction, diversion or even as censorship, fallaciously miscasting an opponent's argument as hyperbole when the comparisons made by the argument are actually appropriate.

#213214 by Kramerguy
Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:12 pm
doesn't help that every prez since raygun has been likened to hitler. It's the new version of boy cried wolf.

#213215 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:29 pm
Kramerguy wrote:doesn't help that every prez since raygun has been likened to hitler. It's the new version of boy cried wolf.


That depends on who is using it and how.

Godwin's law works when it is a liberal trying to compare Hitler to a conservative, since Hitler was always a xenophobic fascist and the word "Nazi" is a contraction of National Socialist Party. Yet Godwin's law doesn't work in reverse since it is entirely appropriate to compare a socialist to Hitler, especially if they are moving towards fascism as quickly as Obama (and the entire DNC) is.


Fascism - "a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism".



You could make the case that Obama has no desire for "nationalism" in a uniquely American sense. He seems to want to destroy the Constitution which a President is sworn to defend, whether he likes it or not, because it is the law of the land.

Though there are certainly racists who aren't happy with a black President, to lump all legitimate opposition into that category is, by definition, racist. This strategy comes from Obama and exposes his racism. Again...how does someone sit under the teachings of Jeremiah Wright for 22 years if they aren't in complete agreement with his racist views? How can someone be mentored by a communist like Frank Marshal Davis and not be radically anti-American? How can someone wear a ring that says "There is no god but allah" on his finger since he was a teenager and not be a muslim, even if only sympathetically?


The only surprising thing to me is how many are defiled by this simple "dictator's trick" and unwittingly perpetrate his agenda without stopping to think about the end result.

Like Germans in 1939






.

#213226 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:52 pm
A Muslim imam (preacher) has been secretly recorded explaining to followers how to receive government assistance they can use to fund a Muslim holy war.

Calling it a "Jihadi Allowance," cleric Anjem Choundary, 45, has four kids, brings in £25,000, or just under $39,000 U.S. in benefits himself, and says that this is the way it is supposed to work according to Islamic law.


Recorded by both the U.K. Sun and Telegraph, Choundary says:

· "We are on Jihad Seekers Allowance, we take the Jizya (protection money paid to Muslims by non-Muslims) which is ours anyway.

· "The normal situation is to take money from the [non-Muslims] isn't it? So this is the normal situation."

· “They give us the money. You work, give us the money. Allah Akbar, we take the money. Hopefully there is no one from the DSS (Department of Social Security) listening.”

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/anjem-ch ... z2RUqngCKj




You do know that the Boston bombers were both on government assistance just like their mom who is on the lam from shoplifting charges?




.

#213228 by J-HALEY
Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:07 pm
Thanks Yod!

The father is coming to the U.S. to take his sons body home. The mother is not coming because of the shop lifting warrant out for her. I for one would like to know who paid for the dead sons trip to Russia (for possible training) after all he was on government assistance so how could he pay for that trip. Also who is paying to ship the sons body and the 2 way ticket for the OLD GEEZER! :shock:

#213231 by Planetguy
Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:42 pm
and yet more reasons to hate and be suspicious of EVERY muslim everywhere....as if ye who preach love out of one side of your mouth and practice quite another thing actually NEED more reasons.

enjoy that ball of xenophobic hate that you insist in wrapping yourselves up in. (i'm sure that's exactly what jesus intended)

quick....cue someone to put up yet some more relevant (in THEIR opinion) scripture. (no, actually...don't)

#213242 by J-HALEY
Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:38 pm
Planetguy wrote:and yet more reasons to hate and be suspicious of EVERY muslim everywhere....as if ye who preach love out of one side of your mouth and practice quite another thing actually NEED more reasons.

enjoy that ball of xenophobic hate that you insist in wrapping yourselves up in. (i'm sure that's exactly what jesus intended)

quick....cue someone to put up yet some more relevant (in THEIR opinion) scripture. (no, actually...don't)


No Mark it is called being REALISTIC and not being so naive! You know like you do gooder liberals that want to tell me what size soda I can drink or how many rounds I can have in my clip, what I should eat?

#213263 by Kramerguy
Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:08 pm
yod wrote:
Kramerguy wrote:doesn't help that every prez since raygun has been likened to hitler. It's the new version of boy cried wolf.


That depends on who is using it and how.

Godwin's law works when it is a liberal trying to compare Hitler to a conservative, since Hitler was always a xenophobic fascist and the word "Nazi" is a contraction of National Socialist Party. Yet Godwin's law doesn't work in reverse since it is entirely appropriate to compare a socialist to Hitler, especially if they are moving towards fascism as quickly as Obama (and the entire DNC) is.


Fascism - "a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism".



You could make the case that Obama has no desire for "nationalism" in a uniquely American sense. He seems to want to destroy the Constitution which a President is sworn to defend, whether he likes it or not, because it is the law of the land.

Though there are certainly racists who aren't happy with a black President, to lump all legitimate opposition into that category is, by definition, racist. This strategy comes from Obama and exposes his racism. Again...how does someone sit under the teachings of Jeremiah Wright for 22 years if they aren't in complete agreement with his racist views? How can someone be mentored by a communist like Frank Marshal Davis and not be radically anti-American? How can someone wear a ring that says "There is no god but allah" on his finger since he was a teenager and not be a muslim, even if only sympathetically?


The only surprising thing to me is how many are defiled by this simple "dictator's trick" and unwittingly perpetrate his agenda without stopping to think about the end result.

Like Germans in 1939
.


Little surprised. You can obviously come up with all of that, and yet, the most obvious seems completely off your radar..

Every prez since reagan- EVERY ONE OF THEM, has further eroded our civil rights, further eroded consumer rights, further eroded environmental protections, further eroded our schools, roads, police (except riot police!), fire, libraries, national parks .. you name it- if it was a benefit to the people, it's been eroded. What has replaced that erosion is nothing short of corporate dominance, abuse, and neglect.

The last Bush administration used 9-11 to utterly destroy a major chunk of all of the above, and obama has continued where he left off, and of course, as part of the status quo, continued the futherance of erosions.

We're at the point where not much is left. We all know it.

So what surprises me is that you still believe this lib vs. con BS. It's all a huge ruse.. a dupe, propaganda, to keep everyone at odds so the whole country doesn't band together and hang every one of these traitors.

You are playing a rigged game.. both sides lose, on purpose. I got out of the game. Eventually you will wise up too.. Eventually everyone will, but at that point, it will likely be too late for us all. The sad part is that anyone like me who understands the truth is more often treated as an enemy by both sides. Part of the game.. carry on.

#213269 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:34 pm
Planetguy wrote:and yet more reasons to hate and be suspicious of EVERY muslim everywhere....as if ye who preach love out of one side of your mouth and practice quite another thing actually NEED more reasons.

enjoy that ball of xenophobic hate that you insist in wrapping yourselves up in. (i'm sure that's exactly what jesus intended)

quick....cue someone to put up yet some more relevant (in THEIR opinion) scripture. (no, actually...don't)




xenophobic hate? Really? That's all you have when asked for a reasoned response?

I haven't attacked a "person" yet, but have been patient and fair about explaining the ideology behind the surface.

C'mon....please try to respond using fact or reason instead of calling names and employing ridicule to deflect answering what you simply don't understand.



Here's some xenophobic hate for ya, btw:


The U.S. Military has blocked access to the Southern Baptist Convention's website on an unknown number of military bases because it contains "hostile content" - just weeks after an Army briefing labeled Evangelical Christians and Roman Catholics as examples of religious extremism, Fox News has learned.


I haven't looked yet...but how much you want to bet that Al Jazeera is allowed?




.
Last edited by t-Roy and The Smoking Section on Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.

#213271 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:46 pm
Kramerguy wrote:Every prez since reagan- EVERY ONE OF THEM, has further eroded our civil rights, further eroded consumer rights, further eroded environmental protections, further eroded our schools, roads, police (except riot police!), fire, libraries, national parks .. you name it- if it was a benefit to the people, it's been eroded. What has replaced that erosion is nothing short of corporate dominance, abuse, and neglect.


No argue there.




The last Bush administration used 9-11 to utterly destroy a major chunk of all of the above, and obama has continued where he left off, and of course, as part of the status quo, continued the futherance of erosions.



It's so hypocritical to hear people say this.

No, Bush proposed a Patriot Act that would expire after 2 years. It could only be extended by vote of Congress.

What did a Democrat controlled Congress do with it? They made it permanent.


We are sitting ducks if we apply the laws of this country to foreign combatants. The Patriot Laws were necessary to root out foreign elements and sleeper cells living in the USA.

But when Bush proposed that, I was on record saying that the first Democrat elected President would abuse those laws for purely political gain. Obama wasn't in office a year before they labeled ALL political opponents as terrorists and stopped calling ANY muslims "terrorists".

Oh no, now it's christians, ex-military, police, "right-wingers" (euphemism for Republic voters).....and they'd like to stick all white-people with that tag by painting us as racists for supporting the Constitution. This Administration has no shame fanning racial and economic stress points to flame.

Yes, I agree we the people are being played but I don't think you understand the gravity of the situation we're in with the current Administration. This is not like anything that has come before. If you truly were watching, you'd agree with that statement.





.

#213274 by Kramerguy
Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:53 pm
ok yod, so we're arguing over semantics then?

You throw a lot of blame at obama's feet, and I won't excuse him for anything, but in doing so, you've also aquitted bush of the same, when the reality of it is that he equally abused those policies. Congress had nothing to do with the illegal wiretapping, and both sides were complicit in covering up and ultimately granting immunity to war criminals and corporate criminals alike.

Like I said, I can't defend obama and don't want to, I'd be the first to read the charges at his trial, but I'd also be adamant about reading the same charges to bush, and both their entire administrations too.

#213287 by MikeTalbot
Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:47 pm
SlackerG

Try re-reading my post and this time - figure out what I was actually saying.

Talbot

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest