This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#166733 by jimmydanger
Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:19 am
You're killing me over here Dizz, you and those pesky facts.

YOD, I don't think contraceptives count as "killing babies". Swing and a miss.

#166739 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:47 am
jimmydanger wrote:You're killing me over here Dizz, you and those pesky facts.

YOD, I don't think contraceptives count as "killing babies". Swing and a miss.

Jimmy,
After fast forwarding through your gig on Sat. I have totally changed my view about free contraceptives. If your mother had them available I wouldn't have wasted 3 minutes of my life.

Boy you have packed on the pounds, and I guess you could use a few more guitar lessons. You were such a pretty boy, what happened? Now you are all bitter. Just to make you feel better you are keeping me healthy, fighting raises T levels. You have been helping me out tremendously. Thanks Jim.

Gotta go,,, Spread some "swimmers" with my wife, and if I ever make out your way,,,, I might Clintonize your wife.

Sorry I meant (not ment, the way you spell it)spread some swimmers.:lol:

#166747 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:54 am
Dizzizz wrote:Ad Hominem

Latin for "To the Man", short for argumentum ad hominem, or "Argument to the Man"

Ad Hominem is an argumentative fallacy where attempts are made to discredit an opponent's arguments by making attacks on the character or past of the opponent instead of addressing the facts and issues at hand.

Thats great dizz, you have just been able to label all the bs purveyors in our country. That definitely includes Jimmy and our president.

You liberals are going to run into a whole group of hardass people like me and you are going to be shocked at the #s.

We are all being polite,,,,,, FOR NOW.

#166748 by jimmydanger
Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:57 am
You're so ugly Glen I could press your face in dough and make gorilla cookies.

Thanks Red.

#166750 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:02 am
Dizzizz wrote:
yod wrote:Guess she'll have to go to the atheist hospitals...oh wait...there are none!? It's hard to believe that all these "loving & tolerant" lefties don't have a single hospital where they can kill as many babies as they want.


13% of American Hospitals are religious (as of 1999, the most recent I could find stats for). That's 604 religious hospitals out of a total of 4,573.




Yes, today most are funded by the public sector. Lots of christians there, btw; or they are funded as a for-profit business by a health care company. But hospitals have historically been founded and funded by religious charities. Sorry if that's inconvenient for your rant against christians.




quote="yod"
Can you tell me why liberals are so intolerant of views other than theirs, that they have to resort to spewing derogatory names as their default answer to simple questions?




Derogatory names like "slut"?



Which Democrat speaking about Sarah Palin's teenage daughter are you referencing? Which Democrat speaking about George Bush's daughter are you referencing? Which Democrat on Bill Maher's show are you referencing? Which reporter of MSNBC are you referencing?

By the way, Rush humbly apologized for going over the line with his comments. Which Democrat has ever done such a thing?

It's this kind of hypocrisy that makes me lose respect for people who ignorantly swallow the liberal talking points.



YOD, I don't think contraceptives count as "killing babies". Swing and a miss.



The Democrats Party has abosolutely no moral conflict about murdering full-term babies, and have no conscience about making abortion their contraceptive of choice.

They support murdering babies at any time in the womb or even shortly thereafter.
Last edited by t-Roy and The Smoking Section on Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:10 am, edited 2 times in total.

#166751 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:03 am
OOOHHH did i hurt your wittle feellings.
I enjoy reading all your vicious attacks .

You really need some guitar lessons. It would be nice if brought some talent into your band.

Come on man, you are the biggest most insulting BS bully around,,,
Take me on, only this time I won't be sweet,,, I'll just be nice. :lol:

#166758 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:09 am
Is that the best you got Jimmy?

I hope I get to the point where I am actually cruel to you.

Oh Oh some one knocking on your door? Better duck? Might be the commie police come to get you cause you voted for Ron Paul in the primary.

Sicko. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

#166783 by Sir Jamsalot
Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:45 am
This entire thread is such a huge non-sequitor it's frightening.

Anyone charmed so easily into thinking one person hates another simply because the first person doesn't want to fund the second persons' personal entertainment is too easily manipulated. This is how societies fold into dictatorships - they are dumbed into irrational concessions that neuter themselves into submission. I believe, useful idiots is an appropriate term here.

Wake up! You're arguing the wrong argument!

#166784 by lalong
Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:13 pm
When the insurance companies cover the cost of contraceptives, will they have collision and injury options as well? In case of falling off the trapeze and getting trampled by the zebras while being beaten by midgets in ballerina customs? And liability? If the contraceptive fails, does the insurance co pay for every expense of the child, from birth to death? All of course done with the fantasy of some reasonable and fair rate, just barley exceeding extortion.

Certainly our biggest national concern should be the costs of contraceptives and I just thank heaven it is now a congressional matter. Although I find it more unsettling than a traditional circus, to watch clowns perform without the full makeup. I am dead set against this format though, it is just not that interesting. Maybe we can get Nancy Pelosi to throw a chair or something, liven it up a little? Oh wow wait! I have a great idea! We can have like a panel of judges commenting on how distracting everyone was from the real issues facing our country. And then maybe the winner gets to come back on the next episode of Smoke and Mirrors? I think we can get more sex in here though. Actually their was a case of a man being injured by over sized boobs. Maybe like safety standards for bras? Tit lash is no laughing matter! How DARE anyone think something is funny, only because it is ridiculous!

In either case I do not know about you folks, but I for one, will sleep a lot sounder once this truly pressing issue is resolved. In fact I have been lobbying for years, that it is harmful for young attractive woman to go without sex from myself. I have done everything I can to help this cause, even to the extent of purchasing my own condoms. No doubt some of you will most likely view me as a martyr for my selfless work in this cause. But if the country s well being is at stake, I AM THERE! In fact for any attractive woman that wishes to have sex with me, I will buy the condoms sparing the insurance companies and congress from this truly crippling dilemma. Times are tough and we all must do whatever we can to pitch in and help. Quick question: Is the movie, drinks and dinner beforehand tax deductible? After all, it is a charity service I will be doing.

In my entire life I would be really hard pressed to think of a more air headed, naive, moronic, trivial dribble of nonsense, to occupy the attention of a congressperson at all. This is really nothing short of a freak show. Oh wait that was awfully politically incorrect of me, I meant a person of challenging aesthetic attributes, show. Wow, and it just rolls right off the tongue. We really have reached a new level of absurdity in this country. :!:

#166785 by fisherman bob
Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:30 pm
The entire argument for or against birth control or for or against abortion is UNWINNABLE. Whether you're for or aganst the issue I think most people would agree that Rush said something really stupid. Regardles of what I wrote in Levitynews I believe the issue should NOT be decided at the federal level. I believe it should be up to each state and each health insurance policy whether birth control and/or abortion is paid for or not. Both should be LEGAL everywhere, but the key for me is who pays for it. If the PHYSICAL health of the woman or fetus is threatened I can see a state or private health insurance FUNDING either. But if somebody gets pregnant and they have no PHYSICAL issues I think the individual should pay out of their own pocket. I also believe each state should vote by referendum every four years when a governor is elected whether their state funds abortion or not for the next four years. There should NEVER be any federal level legislation on this issue. It is a waste of time to argue over and over what is essentially an UNWINNABLE argument and a HUGE WASTE of taxpayers' dollars. NOT ONE RED CENT of MY hard earned money should pay for some other idiot's careless fuc*ing around.

#166795 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:25 pm
Dizzizz wrote:You weren't talking about the past, you were talking about the present. Did you forget what you said? I'll remind you: You said that "loving & tolerant lefties don't have a single hospital."


I concede your point. Where I grew up there was only the Baptist Hospital and St Elizabeth's (Catholic).

Whether you think Rush's apology was sincere or not, he did apologize. Can you show me even one liberal who has apologized for calling Sarah Palin's daughter a slut?

Liberals have been insulting women (who aren't liberal) with impunity for a long time.

#166797 by jimmydanger
Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:54 pm
fisherman bob wrote:The entire argument for or against birth control or for or against abortion is UNWINNABLE. Whether you're for or aganst the issue I think most people would agree that Rush said something really stupid. Regardles of what I wrote in Levitynews I believe the issue should NOT be decided at the federal level. I believe it should be up to each state and each health insurance policy whether birth control and/or abortion is paid for or not. Both should be LEGAL everywhere, but the key for me is who pays for it. If the PHYSICAL health of the woman or fetus is threatened I can see a state or private health insurance FUNDING either. But if somebody gets pregnant and they have no PHYSICAL issues I think the individual should pay out of their own pocket. I also believe each state should vote by referendum every four years when a governor is elected whether their state funds abortion or not for the next four years. There should NEVER be any federal level legislation on this issue. It is a waste of time to argue over and over what is essentially an UNWINNABLE argument and a HUGE WASTE of taxpayers' dollars. NOT ONE RED CENT of MY hard earned money should pay for some other idiot's careless fuc*ing around.


Brilliant! There's not much I could add or change about your statement Bob. A woman should have the choice, but if it's not a medically necessary procedure the patient should be responsible for the cost. Personally I believe abortion should not be a legal option when the fetus is viable (can live outside the mother' womb). Contraception on the other hand should not only be permitted but readily available everywhere and even encouraged - we need less humans, not more.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests