crunchysoundbite wrote:Any thing and everything written in the Bible has been questioned by "historians".
A book that was compiled over 300 years AFTER Jesus died with many parts written by people who did not have any first-hand knowledge of the events in question.
Let's not forget what the Bible really is: it's not the "Word of God" - it's a book written by people and then compiled by a council of historians. The writings that landed in the bible were the product of the Council of Nicaea. God didn't wave a magic wand and print that book and then drop it down from the heavens. Every word in that book was written by men, and many words were written hundreds of years after the events in question - by people who were not witnesses to the events. How accurate do you think any of those writings really are?
Any thinking person is right to question the validity and accuracy of the Bible.
Let me ask you something: In this day and age of the internet and instant communication, suppose I tasked you with writing about a historic incident that happened 300 years ago, so your writing could be part of a "definitive" compilation of that event. How accurate do you think your account would be, given that you weren't alive to witness it? You would at least have the advantage of being able to use reference materials from libraries, books, video, YouTube, the internet, and potentially interviewing people who's families may have been involved in that incident. You'd have a small chance to get *some* details correct based on the quality of your reference material.
The people who wrote the bible? They didn't have any of any those resources. They had their own imaginations. Word of mouth. Stories passed down generation after generation.
We've all played the game in grade school where you stand in a line and whisper something in one person's ear and see how it turns out when it reaches the last person in line. It's never the same is it? Imagine not just passing a single phrase along from person to person, but a whole story about historic event, and then thinking that story is going to be accurate?
Give me a break.
There's a reason any historian would question the Bible. There's a reason any *thinking person* with their own mind would question the contents of the Bible.
It's a book written by men. Assembled by men.
I don't have a problem with people choosing to believe in a higher power or turning to a specific belief system to enhance the happiness and quality of their life. But don't bring the Bible into play. It's a book. Nothing more.