This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#105692 by philbymon
Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:56 pm
Um...no one painted her in any fashion here before you jumped in crying "sheep."

You are quite predjudiced about it all, & it shows.

#105694 by CraigMaxim
Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:12 pm
philbymon wrote:Um...no one painted her in any fashion here before you jumped in crying "sheep."



Don't be delusional Phil.

You have stated many similar things about her in a multitude of posts. That she is stupid, incompetent, and many other demeaning adjectives.

This got onto the subject of Palin herself, because I was accussed of lacking objectivity by you and Colors in particular.

When in fact, I quite easily show how MORONIC your own statements are.



philbymon wrote:You are quite predjudiced about it all, & it shows.




Of course it shows. :roll:

I speak in factual sentences, rather than...

"Baaaa... baaa.... Palin is stupid.... Baaaa baaa.... Palin is just a celebrity wannabe... Baaa... baaa.... Palin can't handle the heat... Baaa.... Baa.... Palin is only qualified to dress a moose.... Baaa... baaa.... Faux News... Baaa baaa.... Palin is a cheerleader nothing more... Baaa Baaa... Palin is irrelevant... Baaa baaa!!!"

I don't do ANYTHING merely because other people do them.

I actually think the issues through on their own merits, on the FACTS!

But you... go ahead... continue on. Jump on the bandwagons, repeat the slogans you read on the cess-pool that is, the Huffington Post. Make friends by repeating mantras and ridding yourself of any original thought.

Or.... be.... REAL.

Don't give a f*ck whether other people like the truth or not. STAND BY THE TRUTH ANYWAY!!!

But then again.... that takes BALLS!

Is it any wonder, that people take the easy... SHEEPISH path?

#105698 by philbymon
Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:52 pm
Spoken like a true baa-baa-believer, Craig!

Facts? I see nothing but your irrational unrequited love for the woman.

I've made no moronic statements in this thread that I can see. Be so kind as to point them out.

Your path takes no balls, Craig. It just takes the continual berating of others to "prove" your point. You might have some merit in your arguments if you could disentangle your bizarre emotions concerning Palin, but I don't see that happening anytime soon.

Truth? You couldn't see the truth if it sat on your face, cuz you're head's all wrapped up in your emotions. It's really silly, man. DO get ahold of yourself!

#105701 by CraigMaxim
Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:08 am
philbymon wrote:
Truth? You couldn't see the truth if it sat on your face, cuz you're head's all wrapped up in your emotions. It's really silly, man. DO get ahold of yourself!



Me get a hold of myself?

HA HA HA HA!!!!


No.... How about... YOU join REALITY?

EVERY CHALLENGE I ever posted regarding Palin, gets UNANSWERED!

Why is that, oh brilliant one?

Because it becomes obvious that she DOES NOT DESERVE the biased and insulting browbeating she gets, from the mindless PARROTS that enjoy repeating supposed "common knowledge"(Palin's alleged stupidity)... except that this is "common knowledge" that apparently can't be defended.

But does that matter to people, with poor character?

Of course not!

That would take their fun away, wouldn't it?

But "I" need to get a hold of myself?

:roll:

#105702 by philbymon
Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:08 am
CraigMaxim wrote:

What a loser.

Baaaa baaaa... I hear sheep.

Gotta say, I loved Fox's response to Mr. Cool J....

"'Real American Stories' features uplifting tales about overcoming adversity and we believe Mr. Smith's interview fits that criteria. However, as it appears that Mr. Smith (L.L. Cool J.) does not want to be associated with a program that could serve as an inspiration to others, we are cutting his interview from the special and wish him the best with his fledgling acting career."


But...but...but...LL Cool J didn't say ANYTHING in this post. Why is HE a sheep?

Face it, bub. You have an irrational attachment to Palin. Maybe you wanna be her big brother, or perhaps something much more, but your knee-jerk reaction to everything Palin is a little disconcerting, Craig.

She's a celebrity. Nothing more. You wouldn't gimme grief for disliking Lady Gaga would ya? Don't even try to tell me that this bee-otch is the savior America's waited for, cuz you'll just get laughter from me & many others.

She's just tv fluff, Craig. A non-issue, really, except in how she can throw a monkey-wrench in the works a la Limbaugh & Beck.

But you go ahead & just stomp the hell outta anyone who says boo about her..but you look like a high school boy with a crush more than anyone I can take seriously, & I'm sorry about that, but I didn't cause it.

And there ya go again, attacking ppl's character for disagreeing with you. Man, you do that in MY town & you'll get your butt kicked all the way back to wherever the hell you come from. Grow up.

#105703 by CraigMaxim
Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:16 am
philbymon wrote:
But...but...but...LL Cool J didn't say ANYTHING in this post. Why is HE a sheep?



Because he is more worried about "appearing" to be involved with the name "Palin" than with having his story be an inspiration to others, facing similar obstacles.

It is UNCONSCIENABLE!

It is EXACTLY like the other uncourageous liberals who would not perform for the troops overseas in the Iraq War, because their Hollywood buddies, might look upon them as supporting the war, when they were only supporting the servicemen and women themselves.

Politics over HEART.
Politics over GOODNESS.
Politics over KINDNESS.
Politics over TRUTH.

It is more important that I... "LOOK GOOD" than that I... "DO GOOD"!

#105706 by philbymon
Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:24 am
Boy are YOU delusional! You got me crying I'm laughing so hard, here, you poor love-smitten boy!

There is absolutely nothing "unconscienable" about not wanting to appear with Palin, anymore than it is unconscionable to want to be associated with Jerry Springer, or Beck, or Limbaugh, or Michael Moore, & I don't care how many "final words" Springer comes up with to make things seem nice, either.

Bottom line remains, it's his perfect right to want nothing to do with her. There is nothing denigrating to Palin about it, & if they had ASKED him to be included, & he said no, this would be a non-issue.

For the record, I wouldn't want to appear with her, either, because it might be construed that I agree with her politics. See, the thing is, Craig, she has made herself into this big political Creature from the Black Lagoon, & now Fox wants to make $ on her political celebrity with some non-political programs, & then they can have the gall to say that anyone who won't participate is being less than nice, or partisan, or whatever. The fact remains that SHE made herself to be that politcal monster that many many ppl don't wanna be associated with, in any venue. But you, in your Palin-blinded vision, fall right into thier dirty little plot, cuzza your emotions. Now, even the flag-wavig Toby Keith would be in your sights, if he dared to admit that he didn't want his interview included in this show. Yep, Fox sure knows how to pull your strings, don't they, puppet-boy?

I'd bet that if LL'd done this with Moore, you would be applauding his choices, wouldn't you?

:lol:

I'd be so embarrassed to be you right now!

#105715 by ColorsFade
Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:44 am
Honestly, I think someone has hijacked Craig's account.

I mean, they type like him - lots of words and lots of spaces between sentences. It *looks* like his handiwork. But it doesn't sound like him anymore.


The real Craig was at least reasonable. This imposter is just a f*cking prick.

I'd say ignore him Phil. It's not the same guy.

Craig is probably trying to figure out how to get his account back and who the hell hacked it?

Oh, BTW - I can't really fault the impostor for the boner. My new girlfriend is way better looking than Palin... and I can't keep a straight thought in my head where she's concerned.

#105723 by philbymon
Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:51 am
90% of the "factual" articles you print out ad nauseum about Palin are opinion, & not "facts," other than how they mention how badly she's hated.

I believe I said it before, Craig - there's a reason for ppl to be hated.

"EVERY CHALLENGE I ever posted regarding Palin, gets UNANSWERED!"

To be honest, Craig, your very extremist views about this person put me off to the point that I don't bother to read those lengthy articles & your windy additions. What I get out of them is mostly fluff journalism, at best, but I'll admit that I don't read them all the way through. That one about meeting Sarah Palin was definitely in that vein, as I recall. I don't think it's really all that relevant, & won't bother to "answer" that particular "challenge."

Perhaps she's quite a fine person. I dunno, & I really don't care. I don't like her public personna. What I see is a negative nelly simply trying to cock-block the popular political process with lies & innuendo & exaggeration, like those other right-wing pundits that are so popular with certain ppl.

You wanna talk "facts?"

Both you & Palin seem to forget the fact that the American ppl spoke in the last election. They voted FOR the guy who promised health care reform, & though the right made it difficult to achieve, achieve it Obama did. That, to me, makes him the hero in this lil scenario. He did what he promised us he would do. He did his job, & got it done in spite of the Palins, the Limbaughs, the Becks, Fox, the Rep minority, et al. Kudos to Barrack.

Quit your crying & get over the fact that you were outvoted by ppl who saw a need & wanted it filled. You may have convinced a large portion of them that it wasn't really what they wanted, but it remains that this is exactly what they voted FOR. THAT was Obama's "mandate from the ppl," to use one of GWB's favorite phrases.

And do try to remember that, even though ppl say they don't want or like this plan, as a whole, thanks to the rhetoric of the far right, 60% of them, Craig, about 2/3 of these nervous types, agreed that nearly each & every line of text in the bill was something they would agree to, indeed, that they would want, in at least one poll, since you're so fond of facts & statistics. I saw the news reports on that, as I'm sure you did, so go look it up & pick it apart. I won't. I can accept it, cuz it's the same reports that Palin has gotten & accepted.

Yet Palin is still on the attack, even though the public is finally going to get what they want! Gee! She really IS a fine American politician, isn't she? Just the person I want in office! Someone who fights against what the ppl vote for. Yep. She's a fine example of a right-wing politician, who will continually side against me, the ppl, & with them, the corp interests.

And you think my views on her are without justification...

#105725 by CraigMaxim
Fri Apr 02, 2010 5:20 am
ColorsFade wrote:
The real Craig was at least reasonable.



What's unreasonable?


I think trashing someone personally, because it is in vogue, is unreasonable. Doesn't stop any of your intellectual dishonesty though, does it?

#105726 by CraigMaxim
Fri Apr 02, 2010 5:25 am
philbymon wrote:
I believe I said it before, Craig - there's a reason for ppl to be hated.



Save that "wisdom" for the next Hitler, who will need your special types of rationales.

#105730 by philbymon
Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:00 am
CraigMaxim wrote:
ColorsFade wrote:
The real Craig was at least reasonable.



What's unreasonable?


I think trashing someone personally, because it is in vogue, is unreasonable. Doesn't stop any of your intellectual dishonesty though, does it?



And how many of us have you trashed personally, in this very thread, because we don't like your lil goddess, hmmmm?

"Intellectual dishonesty?" Oooo! Nice phrase, Craig, though it hardly applies.

CraigMaxim wrote:
philbymon wrote:
I believe I said it before, Craig - there's a reason for ppl to be hated.



Coming from a sexist, antisemite. :roll:

Yeah, I understand YOUR thought process already.

Thanks, but no thanks.

Save your "wisdom" for the next Hitler, who will need your kind of rationale.



Nice! Yet another fine example of your debating skills at work, Craig!

You have yet to prove a single point to anyone, but you sure can toss around some mighty fine personal insults, even as you "protect" your lil dream girl from personal insults! Hypocrisy? Nah, it CAN'T BE! Cuz it's YOU doin' it. right, Craig?

:roll:

Who are you trying to kid?

Um...before you go off bewailing how badly she's being treated, you may want to actually READ the thread, sonnyboy. No one has been all that ugly to her. You're once again projecting your expectations onto us & reacting to them without just cause. That's why I keep telling you to get a grip on yourself, Craig. No one has yet said a thing about her lack of experience, or her stupidity, or how good she looks in moose-blood-drenched bikini.

Once again, you act like a child & let your emotions & your expectations & your knee-jerky reactions rule you, & you look foolish.

Where's that famous Craig intellect when you really need it, man!?!?

The least you could do would be to speak to us in a civil fashion, but you haven't been able to do that since your very first response. You lash out at anyone who dislikes the woman for any reason whatsoever, Craig, & every time you do that, you immediately lose both your integrity & your credibility. If you cannot control yourself, why should anyone pay attention to you at all? You have nothing to back up your emotions on the subject. That's what it tells me, when you act like this. There's nothing real there, & you get frustrated because you haven't anything but your opinion of this person (well...& what "god told you about her") to back any of your claims up, so you lash out at ppl in a very personal & nasty way. I'm sorry, but this just makes you look so small to me, & very very far from the fair & balanced, informed, & loving man you claim to be. You've been abusive time & again when it comes to Palin. Perhaps you should really sit down & explore why, on your own, & give the embarrassing remarks a rest for a bit, cuz you really look bad to many of us right now, & whether you care about that or not, it doesn't help your cause, either. In fact, it most likely makes us all stand a little more firmly against her, when we see how badly her followers act with such predictable regularity.

You need to quit projecting your expectations on me, Craig, & address my thought-out reasons for my dislike of her as a politician, entertainer, & pundit. (You can't, can you? Cuz my reasons are sound. Get over it.)

#105734 by CraigMaxim
Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:20 am



Phil,

You keep making up things, and putting words in my mouth, that I did not say myself. I said quite plainly that there were LEGITIMATE reasons to not like Sarah Palin, and that what I took issue with, is intellectually dishonesty and unwarranted personal attacks, merely because someone doesn't like her.

Sarah Palin in the reason the post exists in the first place. So, it is reasonable to speak about her, and what has been said in other posts. And it is YOUR FEELINGS, and not mine, which is coloring REALITY here. Some of you take offense at Fox for engaging in STANDARD MEDIA PRACTICES... why? Because Sarah Palin is involved! Not because of the practice itself, of using old interviews for new projects.

That alone, is PROOF, that it is YOU GUYS who are full of sh*t here, and not me! ;-)

I handily proved that there is NOTHING WRONG with this NORMAL and COMMON media practice. Do any of you say... "Gee, you're right Craig! My distaste of Sarah Palin, colored the actual facts, which are, that this happens all the time in media production, and there is nothing seedy or unethical about it."

No, of course not.

Instead, I get accused of having a hard-on for Sarah Palin. :roll:

Substituting a FALSE MOTIVE for my TRUE MOTIVE, gentlemen, doesn't alter the fact, that on this issue... I am right, and you were wrong. It may make you feel better to continue your dishonesty, rather than admit your error, but that will not magically convert your falsehoods into truths.

#105737 by CraigMaxim
Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:35 am
philbymon wrote:
You need to quit projecting your expectations on me, Craig, & address my thought-out reasons for my dislike of her as a politician, entertainer, & pundit. (You can't, can you? Cuz my reasons are sound. Get over it.)



You may have legitimate reasons for not liking her as a politician, but your IRRATIONAL hatred of her, is EXTREME, and glaring. When you call her a "bitch" and all the other choice words you provide, then you are PROVING that you really have no desire for a serious discussion of her, as a person or as a politician.

You've probably lost some of your former targets of hatred, due to the more PC age we live in, and it seems socially acceptable to treat Sarah Palin like a slave, so she fills that need for you, and you won't get "in trouble" for beating up, degrading and insulting her, will you? ;-)

#105738 by gtZip
Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:41 am
You know what?
Knock it off.
:evil:

If I see one more thread about Palin I'm going to puke.
She doesnt deserve to be bashed, but neither does she deserve to be
doted over.
She certainly doesnt deserve to have a post thrown up about her on a music forum every other week.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests