Kramerguy wrote:
The "common" view I've seen on most sites says 300 years later, so I typed that, as "heresay" in my post, because I really don't know.
I think you are confusing when the Bible was "canonized" (officially compiled and recognized) with how old the various manuscripts that MAKE UP THE BIBLE are, and when they were first "written".
Early canonization efforts, by Origen, a famous biblical scholar, for example, occurred in the early 200's, and more officially, later, in the 300's sometime. Although the same books were accepted, that Origen had originally set.
Nevertheless, the process took SEVERAL HUNDRED YEARS, which you will be pleased to know, is strong evidence, that this process was UNDER MAN'S CONTROL rather than exclusively under God's control... otherwise, it would not have taken God, hundreds of years, to be SURE about, which books were authentic or not. God would have known that, right? And been able to give them a list within seconds.
That's why, though the Bible -IS- a work, inspired by God, it has to be understood in the context, that FALLEN MAN, was filtering God's inspiration, through their own fallen nature. They did the best they could, but HUNDREDS OF YEARS, to be SURE which books may be authentic or not? There will have to be some errors or misunderstandings of God's inspiration present.
That conclusion is unavoidable.
Kramerguy wrote:
Experience tells me that it's the winners who write history, and it's almost always a one-sided and very biased history at that. Experience tells me that MOST, if not all of what I learned from history books in school was generic facts with extremely pertinent details left out, or just plain fantasy.
You are right. Often this is the case, even with INSPIRED works.
In some defense of the process however, though the canonization took HUNDREDS OF YEARS, proving that God does not always CONTROL man, even where His own Inspirations are concerned... nevertheless, the fact they poured over and debated these texts for so long, also PROVES that it was not a haphazard exercise. They wanted, very sincerely, to get it right! So it would be wrong, in this case, to reduce it to "the winners write what they want" or something similar.
Kramerguy wrote:
Deductive reasoning and logic tell me that if god existed, there would be far less random suffering and far less evil-dooers in the world that get ahead in life.
I've addressed this in other posts, if you care to go back and check them.
But there are VERY LOGICAL reasons why a God of love, and a world of suffering, side by side with goodness, are completely compatible.
It is as simple as the fact of "Free Will"
We have free will.
Not everyone will choose good. And the world will suffer the consequences when many don't choose goodness and unselfishness. If God were to remove our free will, and thereby remove any opportunity for people doing harm to others, He would be simultaneously REMOVING ANY POSSIBLITY of LOVE existing in this world. Love only exists in FREEDOM. We only LOVE out of a desire, a free choice, to do so. Otherwise we are programmed robots, and like
Roxxxy the sex doll, we may be entertainment for someone, but we can never LOVE.
Roxxxy is a PROGRAMMED robot, INCAPABLE OF LOVE.
God did not desire that for us.
THAT is logical. Then the decision is merely "Was God wrong" to allow us the POSSIBILITY of being LOVING BEINGS, even though He knew, that love would not always be chosen by us.
For those that have tasted God's love...
It is not a question at all.
LOVE is ABSOLUTELY, worth, the price paid to allow it to exist. The gift you CURSE God for, I praise Him for.
It is a matter of perspective.
Kramerguy wrote:But again, do I go around defending these points, trying to convince YOU that you live your life incorrectly? Has any agnostic ever tried to "convert" you, unprovoked?
Generally no.
Neither atheists nor agnostics, as a general rule, push their beliefs on others. What they do instead, is work toward
ALL RELIGION BEING BANISHED from the planet, or more often, they
mock, degrade and insult, believers for their "ignorance" and "stupidity" for not recognizing the supposedly superior LOGIC of their own positions.
All I can tell you, is that I have studied all sides, of all of these issues, for many decades, from spiritual perspectives and intellectual ones, and I have an IQ that puts me in the top half of "one" percentage point of the WORLD'S POPULATION.
This means, that out of nearly
7,000,000,000 (7 Billion) people on the planet... I am assessed to be smarter than
6,965,000,000 of them.
Call me crazy.
But I am not "stupid" by any stretch of the imagination!
.