jimmydanger wrote:Um, did you read the entire article? It also states that we are finding more oil than ever, that we'll never run out and that people who say otherwise are "alarmists". And oil contains organic artifacts because it picks them up on the way to the surface from the mantle? Are you kidding me? The mantle is molten rock, not oil. Unbelievable.
I read the whole article Jimmy.
I think that's what's kind of fascinating about it - you can't read an article like that think for one second that you have the 100% absolute truth about anything.
We were all taught things in grade school that we later learned were wrong. That's science. That's the world we live in. So why should this be any different?
So, it presents an interesting challenge to us and to experts alike. It makes you realize that you don't know jack, and who really does? And if we can admit to our own ignorance about these sorts of things, then maybe we can approach them with a more open mind and try and figure out ways to actually analyze stuff better and more accurately so that we CAN know something with a certain degree of certainty.
I know for myself, I don't know anything about oil, the earth's lower layers, or the size and range of our oil fields. I rely on what others tell me, through media or publications. But how much of that is fact? When someone told me in grade school that oil was made of dead dinosaurs, my B.S. detector went off - even back then! But even though I might not believe oil has a biological origin, I have no proof - I'm not a scientist in that field. I don't know. So that's not a scientific thing.
Also, I've never been down into the earth's core. I have no idea what is really down there. I rely on others who claim to be experts... They could be wrong too...
That's the thing... we read stuff and we believe it, but the people who published those things could be wrong. So the only smart thing to do is never accept anything as a known fact right away and without further proof.
My own feelings is that oil probably isn't created by dead dinosaurs... it seems ludicrous and it doesn't jive with the evidence and it just feels wrong. But even IF oil is not created by biological means and is produced some other way deep down in the Earth, I think the chances that such a thing can happen rapidly - and that our oil fields can replenish themselves at the rate we're using them up - that seems absurd to me.
The bottom line is that we have a finite sized planet with a finite set of resources. And while some resources may be renewable, relying on that renewing is a bad idea. The renewable process could take billions of years - we don't know. I think it's way more likely that we're going to tap our resources sooner rather than later, and then our world will change radically, and not for the better.
It worries me that some cry "alarmist"... to me, it seems like a solid way to act - to be prepared instead of ignoring it...