jw - spoken like a true gentleman.
Rev Mike wrote:this statement is rediculous, society has accepted that murder is morally wrong, so you cannot compare it to speeding, however, speeding IS worse than smoking pot at home and relaxing. Speeding leads to alot more deaths a year than sitting home relaxing.
my point was that it would be silly to argue the proximity to wrong of speeding vs smoking vs murder... none of them are equivalent nor does any one excuse the other. why waste time arguing a point like that?
Rev Mike wrote:that vaporizing nor consuming pot brownies dissolve the harmful effects it has on your heart, brain and stomach. It will eventually kill you and studies have shown that long term use inevitable leads to paranoia
studies that have shown that data have long since been debunked by more current, advanced studies.
"A number of studies have shown an association between chronic marijuana use and increased rates of anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, and schizophrenia."
6 Moore TH, Zammit S, Lingford-Hughes A, et al. Cannabis use and risk of psychotic or affective mental health outcomes: A systematic review. Lancet 370 (9584):319–328, 2007.
that is a 2007 study. now it's not like you saw in 'reefer maddness' where you will immediately go crazy... but long term abuse does lead to increased anxiety.
"Long-term harmful effects of marijuana (MJ) include risk for heart attacks and strokes in addition to impaired learning and memory... Scientists have found CB receptors in many organs including the brain, heart, liver, kidney, and spleen."
http://www.bio-medicine.org/biology-new ... ks-3277-1/that is based on a 2008 study.
In addition, I have a friend that conducted his own 20 year study on the matter and he claimed to get paranoid if he smoked a lot w/o any breaks. just sayin.
Rev Mike wrote:I want cops to start testing for it after car crashes so we can get some actual data on that.
when they find a test that can determine how recent usage was, I would have no problem with that, but for now, since it stays in your system for 30 days or more, that is an unfair test. a breathalyzer test done after 12 hours doesn't necessarily detect the alcohol amount in the body at the time of crash either, and that is how long it takes for the "official" breathalyzer in most busy urban areas, which shows just how low the numbers are compared to the number at the time of accident.
not a bad point... it is difficult to determine that based on blood/urine... oh but wait: we have a field sobriety test for alcohol and we citizens have accepted that as a fair means to test people's sobriety... it'd be a short leap to allow it for pot.
Rev Mike wrote:If you do it with a prescription, you are careful to keep it from effecting others I think it's fine in and of itself.
If you don't have a prescrip, it is illegal and one could make a very good argument that it is irresponsible behavior
you could say its irresponsible because its illegal, but no one is perfect,
thanks, you've now gotten out of denial on the irresponsible boat. again, lets not argue the proximity to responsible... lets just agree that it is irresponsible on some level.
Rev Mike wrote:I put the use of marijuana, as a responsible adult, on the same level as failing to use your turn signal onto a one way street. my opinion, i know, but also the opinion of 53% of americans according to the latest gallup poll on the subject.
hmm, yet it remains 100% illegal... unfortunately where you put it on your irresponsibility scale doesn't matter.
again, don't want to argue proximity to wrong but failing to use a signal can be accidental... not one accidentally smokes pot... so for that reason I would put it higher on that scale... but fortunately my or your opinion on that doesn't matter till we vote and it becomes law... right now the law is it's illegal.
Rev Mike wrote:I really don't have a prob with folks using pot. Don't think that because I make the argument that I think it could mean u r irresponsible mean that I think it makes you a terrible person, that you should be put in jail, or that I haven't been irresponsible myself.
Who here among us is 100% responsible all the time?
It really is all about personal responsibility. Stupid is as stupid does, regardless of whether its pot or an energy drink, the drug in each will affect the stupid and the stupid will do stupid things, those of us who dont do stupid things like operate a vehicle while under the influence are not irresponsible.
dang, I thought we got out of denial on the irresponsibility boat... it is illegal and that means it's irresponsible. come back to the boat!
Rev Mike wrote:I don't smoke to get high, I smoke to medicate and meditate (meditating once a week in "church" and dont drive at all that day),
you keep repeating that... are you trying to convince me or you?
Rev Mike wrote:oh, and I realize that perhaps jw and others have earned the harsh comments you made above re your music prowess, but there's really no need to let this get ugly. You can't influence someone by getting nasty and it just ends up looking like you (both parties) are losing the argument.
i completely agree that the name calling and such is childish and i responded in kind, which was also not a good thing, but I feel like, as I said above, I'm being thrown to the lions for supporting my own beliefs
spoken like a true gentleman... but don't go on to justify it based being fed to the lions... maybe your new to the internet but that's what it's for (at least that what everyone uses it for)
it's simple: if you don't want to defend your stance - the inet is probably not the best place to post about a big pot support party. even pot smokers will line up to argue with you.
OH...................NO.....................ANOTHER INTERNET THREAD SPIRALING INTO NAME CALLING/ I'M RIGHT YOUR WRONG/ ARGUMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
THAT NEVER HAPPENS!
HEHE.