So, what I'm getting is that visual is important in a performance and that dressing for the occassion is the best way, for example, wedding, party vs biker week, bar gig. I think that's how most would approach it. I mean wouldn't that be a hoot, your band gets hired for a wedding, and they all show up wearing purple bandanas and boots ( of course the heels are painted purple to match ), sorry VB, I could not resist! Anyway, my question now is, say a band is really good, they keep the crowd, and they are booking gigs, but they just do the good ol' denim shirts , T's, jeans, you get the picture. What do you think? Do they need an image or is that their image? This is not about making it or anything , this is your average cover band, who wants steady work, and THAT IS IMPORTANT to them and of course to have fun doing it! I think it's different if you are doing originals and you want to go BIG TIME. Then I can see the visual thing being an issue. But, when you go to a local bar/restaurant to see a band or maybe you just go to eat and the band happens to be playing that nite, do you ever think , NICE MUSIC, but they need to dress better? Do you think a band has a better chance if they "LOOK NICE" or is it all about the money the bar is pulling in while you're playing?