Check this out Chipster: As opposed to titling what we are/do with the broadness of "musician," why not title yourself by what instrument(s) you play, if you choose to give yourself such a title to begin with? I find this to have less of the "magician" effect, and people have been more inclined to take me seriously as a "bassist" or "bass player" rather than as a "musician."

Perhaps its less intimidating, or less of a jump from reality to know what you actually do or what you actually play. I'm not sure, but it seems to work that way for me, through the experiences that I've had.
philbymon wrote:Huh? Call me anything but late for dinner...
Actually, I'm very very proud to be a musician. Sorry you don't feel that way...
I feel the same way Philby. Being a musician, whether you choose to title yourself as a "musician," "(instrument)ist," or nothing at all, does give a sense of pride because it isn't something that everyone can do, or at least do well. Here's a cheesy example of what I mean: I admire people who can fix things...

I'm not handy at all (my wife laughs at me because she fixes stuff better than I do), and I kind of admire, or mystify, or whatever... people who are handy, because I want to be something more than what I am.
Personally, I don't mind being admired as a "musician," or "bassist," or whatever else.

Maybe I took it too deep for what you meant Chip, and if so, just call me out on it.
