#46978 by nobodyyouknow
Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:21 pm
Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:21 pm
Crip2Nite wrote:Nah.... Subject still open.... If you came in my neck-o-the woods and billed yourself as a band that played "Radiohead" You would be billed in the rags and on the marqee as a Radiohead Tribute band! Again nothing wrong with that... you would attract Radiohead fans from my area and they would ask their friends if they wanted to go see a Radiohead tribute band... which means that you are not really Radiohead but are playing Radiohead's songs!
Okay then, WOOSH! you hear that? Topic re-opened!



Meanwhile, our local rag, City Pages, has put a reporter on us whose been following us around over the last couple of weeks to a rehearsal and a gig. We'll see what he has to say when the article comes out, sometime around February. I'll letcha know, fersure.

There's also this: Before putting the band together, I did a lot of research in asking people, "What do you think of when you think of a tribute band?" The majority said dress-up-to-look-like-the-band, imitating the musicians & the music, sounding just like the record, etc. On the whole, the words "tribute band" seemed to leave a sour taste in people's mouths. So when I told them we were thinking of covering Radiohead, they were like, "Does your singer sound like Thom Yorke?" I said yes. But I also emphasized that we'd do "our own thing" with the music. Everyone who knew & liked Radiohead seemed cool w/ that, saying that Radiohead was innovative enough to warrant experimentation in live performances. They also said, "If you sound just like the record, I might as well stay home and listen to the record."

Some additional food for thought (or maybe not): Someone once told me there are three levels of musicianship: imitation, assimilation & innovation. I'm won't say we're at the 3rd level, but I can confidently say we're beyond the 1st.