yod wrote:
Geography plays a HUGE part in the attitudes of people......
....So you have Jeff and Glenny railing against a government that takes from our paychecks to give to someone who is only sucking benefits from the system. And, if you allow me to state an observation, Mark & Jimmy do not see that view as compassionate because they've done well enough to have a comfortable life and want to share with the less fortunate around them.
the difference is that jeff and glenny see anyone and everyone who gets (and might actually need) assistance as "only sucking benefits from the system" .
the fact that i don't see that as compassionate...that has ZERO to do with my comfort level or financial security. i've always felt as i do now, even when i was scuffling and trying to make ends meet. i simply NEVER shared that view that everyone who needs help is a parasite taking advantage of those who are better off.
Those who are struggling don't like the idea of giving away their small margins to people who need to learn the value of work.
again there it is...the assumption that everyone in need...is in NEED of "learning the value of work".
guess what, i'm not struggling and i don't like the idea of giving anything away to those manipulating the system either! do you think jimmy does? i doubt it. the diff is that we don't believe in turning our backs on those that really NEED help.
Those who are doing well think that sounds heartless, and don't understand why we would oppose taking a few extra dollars of a paycheck away to give to someone who puts their hand out.
like i said above....i've ALWAYS thought it heartless and selfish to put everyone needing help in that same bag....moochers.
trust me, i have no desire to help anyone who's manipulating the system. i'm sure jimmy feels the same. the difference is that we can see people who are truly in need, and deserving, and worthy of help....and so we have no problem helping them.
and that has nothing to do with the fact that we're financially comfortable.
ted, if you or glenny, or haley actually believe there's ANYONE truly in need and deserving... that's newsworthy because in all the time i've been here....i've never ONCE heard any of you actually acknowledge that.
furthermore...though i'd prefer a system that couldn't be manipulated by those who would exploit it, i'm willing to accept a system where some do because i'd rather we didn't turn our backs on those who truly need help (many of them being veterans who've paid their dues).
In other words, some want to feed the hungry and some want to teach fishing.
there's no reason both can't be done.....but then you'd have to be willing to spend money on programs to teach fishing! (yeah right!)
so, where's that money coming from...the compassionless who sit in judgement of those in need?
from you guys who believe we're already spending too much money on those who are"only sucking benefits from the system" ?
BREAD IS GREAT!
PRAISE CHALLAH!!!!
PRAISE CHALLAH!!!!