General Chat (Non-Music-Related)

Immigrants Being Used to Build Democrat-Majority Cities
Posted on May 12, 2015 by Common Constitutionalist Filed under Business, Economics, Foreign Policy, Immigration

http://godfatherpolitics.com/22334/immi ... ty-cities/

WND reported that on April 23 Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed signed an agreement with U.S. Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS) making Atlanta a “welcoming city.”

“Reed became the nation’s fourth mayor to embrace the White House push to roll out the welcome mat for new immigrants and refugees and remove barriers to citizenship. Critics say the program has little to do with creating new citizens and everything to do with creating new Democrat voters.”

Come to America – settle in one of our “welcoming cities.” We’ll give you free housing, food, schooling, etc. Of course, none of it is really free, but you don’t have to worry about those pesky details. The city will just raise everyone’s taxes to pay for you. In exchange, all you have to do is register as a Democrat and vote as you’re told, when you’re told.

Oh, and don’t worry about any possible backlash from the current city residents. After all, they were stupid enough to elect us or they’re part of a white minority.

The three other mayors who already signed similar deals are Rahm Emanuel of Chicago, Eric Garcetti of Los Angeles, and Karl Dean of Nashville.

Okay, I get Chicago and Los Angeles, but Nashville? Has Nashville always been liberal, or is it just a recent phenomenon?

“Reed told the AJC [Atlanta Journal Constitution] those governors and mayors who don’t welcome refugees and immigrants will eventually be seen as having been ‘on the wrong side of history’ and ‘they’re also on the wrong side of the economy.’”

“City spokeswoman Melissa Mullinax told WND that Reed began working with Welcoming America more than a year ago,” in preparation for the signing.

“Welcoming America is headed by David Lubell, a close associate of President Obama who met with the president when he announced his executive amnesty plans in Nashville last November. Lubell’s group was hatched in 2010 with $150,000 in seed money from billionaire George Soros and is now flush with federal grants,” writes WND.

Instead of just these cities fitting the bill, it will be all of us paying these hard working families to settle here. Silly me thinking Obama wouldn’t spread the misery equally.

Speaking of “the wrong side of the economy” and hard working families who come here just looking for an opportunity to live the American dream -- what will they do when they settle into their new adopted home cities?

Let’s take a quick look at the employment situation in Atlanta. In September 2014, it was determined that the state of Georgia had the highest unemployment rate in the nation at 8.1%. Now we all know that 8.1% isn’t the real number. If 8.1% is the published number it’s really in double digits, probably at least 13-14%.

In February 2015, the rate for Atlanta was said to have dropped to 7.1%, the same as Chicago. This number is also nowhere close to the real unemployment rate.

In 2011, BET.com reported that the black unemployment rate for Atlanta was 24.1%. Considering what we know of the Obama economic recovery, do we think it’s dropped considerably in four years, if at all?

So the mayor of Atlanta has signed on to a plan to bring more poor unemployed people to a city where the unemployment rate is already ridiculously high to compete for the few low wage/low skilled jobs which are available.

That’s really looking out for “your people” Mr. Mayor. But just like the political whores in Washington, what should we expect from a party-man who will sell his current constituency down the river in favor of a new permanent voting block?

.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

What Hillary Just Did Proves She’ll Be Worse Than Obama In This Fundamental Transformation
chris 6 days ago

http://conservativeread.com/what-hillar ... formation/

Many critics of President Obama’s executive orders granting amnesty to illegal immigrants have long feared that a big reason for the president’s dogged determination to legalize millions of non-citizens is his desire to create new Democrat voters — so many new voters that Republicans might forever find themselves a losing minority at the polls. Now, given what the leading Democrat in the race for the White House has just done on the campaign trail in Nevada, it would seem that amnesty and the votes it might swing could be a huge and powerful trump card in the 2016 political game.

The Washington Times reports that Hillary Clinton is promising that, if elected, she will go further than the president and essentially out-Obama Obama himself: “…she would try to expand President Obama’s deportation amnesty to more illegal immigrants, saying this administration has left out a number of aliens who deserve to be granted legal status.”

Demorgop

The Democrat presidential hopeful was speaking to a Cinco de Mayo meeting attended by a small and carefully crafted photo-op group of young Hispanics who clearly showed their approval of Mrs. Clinton’s progressive position — her pledge to expand the Obama amnesty program, with the eager-for-Latino-support candidate arguing that the president hasn’t gone far enough with his executive actions.

“She said she wants Congress to pass a broad immigration bill that would grant most illegal immigrants ‘a path to full and equal citizenship,’ but said if Capitol Hill continues to stalemate, she would use presidential powers to the extent of the law.”

As Breitbart News notes in its coverage of Mrs. Clinton’s Las Vegas event, Hillary listed a number of moves she would make as president to grant comprehensive rights and protections to illegal immigrants. Apparently she made no mention of how she might protect the rights of current U.S. citizens by doing anything like securing the border. Mrs. Clinton also took a big swipe at Republicans who could be running against her in the race for the presidency.

As Breitbart reports: “Clinton then said, ‘when they talk about legal status, that is code for second-class status.’ She also declared that ‘if Congress continues to refuse to act, as President, I would do everything possible under the law to go even further.’”

Going to motive for Hillary Clinton’s all-in approach to granting full citizenship rights to millions of illegals, one can refer to a recent editorial in The Washington Times, entitled, “Amnesty for illegals and a permanent Democratic majority.” The editorial refers to findings from a Washington-based think tank called The Center for Immigration Studies.

…mass immigration takes votes away from Republicans and gives them to Democrats. “Each one percentage-point increase in the immigrant share of a large county’s population…reduces the Republican share of the two-party vote by nearly 0.6 percentage points, on average.”

The conclusions further note that the “enormous flow” of legal immigrants into the country — 29.5 million from 1980 to 2012 — “has remade and continues to remake the nation’s electorate in favor of the Democratic Party.”