This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

General discussion for non music topics. BE RESPECTFUL OR YOUR POSTS WILL BE DELETED.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#242815 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Wed May 06, 2015 1:26 am
I'm only ashamed that there are any Americans who are willing to surrender freedom of speech to bullies.

If people can stomp on and burn the American flag and call it "free speech", then drawing cartoons is easily in the category of protected speech also. If someone can put Jesus in a jar of piss and call it "Free speech" then drawing cartoons is not nearly as offensive.

If we have to hide our faces from Islamic thugs, then we are already a nation of slave cattle.

And neither Greta nor the Donald are "my own", btw. She comes from CNN and is at least respectable, but he's a Democrat who tries to act like he's not because the party has left him behind with all the marxism.






.

.
#242823 by Badstrat
Wed May 06, 2015 4:47 am
"Your very own Greta Van Susteren and Donald Trump have now come out condemning this foolish stunt. This idiot almost cost 200 people their lives; the police involved were just about to drive away when the attack occurred. She should be charged with inciting terrorism. And you morons should be ashamed of yourselves."


What manner of fool is it who would attempt to assign a political affiliation to cowardice? It is cowardice that cowards have in common, nothing else. Cowards never run out of excuses to obscure the truth.

They didn't "almost" cause anything.

Perhaps in the Alice in Wonderland run a muck fantasy world of the liberal mind where "Could a-should a-might-a" rules supreme it might make perfect sense. At least it might make sense to another liberal mind. To those based in reality it is simply another cloak under which the coward hides. Cowards always make excuses in an attempt to hide the fear that resides within their hearts, but the excuses they make betrays them. The "if we do this they might do that" is a declaration of cowardice in itself. They have you trembling in fear of them. You have sold your freedom and honor out of fear of what you think they "might" do, and that is a far cheaper price than selling out for what they say they will do.
#242838 by J-HALEY
Wed May 06, 2015 1:29 pm
TheFarleys wrote:Your very own Greta Van Susteren and Donald Trump have now come out condemning this foolish stunt. This idiot almost cost 200 people their lives; the police involved were just about to drive away when the attack occurred. She should be charged with inciting terrorism. And you morons should be ashamed of yourselves.

The only "morons" I see around are you liberals that take your freedom for granted! Freedom of speech that Many Americans fought, served and some paid the ultimate sacrifice for. Military men take an oath to defend the "Constitution Of These United States" Yet "morons like you carry on as though it can never be taken away. Meanwhile you're stuck in denial and allowing a communist government to take control of the country and systematically take away your freedoms from right under your noses and you have THE GALL to defend them. That's Moronic! :lol:
#242841 by Planetguy
Wed May 06, 2015 1:40 pm
i said it before....no one is attacking "freedom speech". (as much as you and your team want to pound that narrative into the ground)

i believe that idiot, geller and her hate group are entitled to their's.

i believe the KKK hate group is entitled to their's.

the aryan nation hate group is entitled to their's.

skinheads are entitled to their's.....

that doesn't make them anything more that the douchebags and lowlife scumbuckets they are. their freedom of speech (which i'm not trying to deny them) simply gives them a platform to show themselves for the cretins they are. go team go. :oops:
#242845 by Planetguy
Wed May 06, 2015 2:01 pm
and jeff...since i support YOUR right to freedom of speech.....please feel free to lend your voice to supporting that nitwit Geller or any of the other groups i mentioned. that IS your right.
#242850 by Badstrat
Wed May 06, 2015 3:09 pm
"i believe the KKK hate group is entitled to their's."

I should hope so, after all it was both founded by and continued as a staple of the demoncrat party. As a good little demoncrat drone you certainly should support their racist platforms. Robert Byrd, was the top officer (Exalted Cyclops) in the local Klan unit and was the senate demoncret minority leader for years. Now they deny the KKK, but they still practice its discrimination against blacks to this day through margret sangers planned parenthood Negro genocide machine. And also through other anti black initiatives.disguised as efforts to help the black man whom they still oppress and keep at the poverty level for political reasons.

............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com ... ocratParty

KKK Terrorist Arm of the Democratic Party

By Frances Rice

History shows that the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party. This ugly fact about the Democrat Party is detailed in the book, A Short History of Reconstruction, (Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., 1990) by Dr. Eric Foner, the renown liberal historian who is the DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University. As a further testament to his impeccable credentials, Professor Foner is only the second person to serve as president of the three major professional organizations: the Organization of American Historians, American Historical Association, and Society of American Historians.
Democrats in the last century did not hide their connections to the Ku Klux Klan. Georgia-born Democrat Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan wrote on page 21 of the September 1928 edition of the Klan’s “The Kourier Magazine”: “I have never voted for any man who was not a regular Democrat. My father … never voted for any man who was not a Democrat. My grandfather was …the head of the Ku Klux Klan in reconstruction days…. My great-grandfather was a life-long Democrat…. My great-great-grandfather was…one of the founders of the Democratic party.”

Dr. Foner in his book explores the history of the origins of Ku Klux Klan and provides a chilling account of the atrocities committed by Democrats against Republicans, black and white.

On page 146 of his book, Professor Foner wrote: “Founded in 1866 as a Tennessee social club, the Ku Klux Klan spread into nearly every Southern state, launching a ‘reign of terror‘ against Republican leaders black and white.” Page 184 of his book contains the definitive statements: “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired the restoration of white supremacy. It aimed to destroy the Republican party’s infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life.”

Heartbreaking are Professor Foner’s recitations of the horrific acts of terror inflicted by Democrats on black and white Republicans. Recounted on pages 184-185 of his book is one such act of terror: “Jack Dupree, a victim of a particularly brutal murder in Monroe County, Mississippi - assailants cut his throat and disemboweled him, all within sight of his wife, who had just given birth to twins - was ‘president of a republican club‘ and known as a man who ‘would speak his mind.’”

“White gangs roamed New Orleans, intimidating blacks and breaking up Republican meetings,“ wrote Dr. Foner on page 146 of his book. On page 186, he wrote: “An even more extensive ‘reign of terror’ engulfed Jackson, a plantation county in Florida’s panhandle. ‘That is where Satan has his seat,‘ remarked a black clergyman; all told over 150 persons were killed, among them black leaders and Jewish merchant Samuel Fleischman, resented for his Republican views and for dealing fairly with black customers.“

Frances Rice is the Chairman of the National Black Republican Association and may be contacted at: http://www.nbra.info/
#242851 by DainNobody
Wed May 06, 2015 3:17 pm
only one flaw in your argument Slacker, the philosophy and agenda of the Democrats when the KKK was birthed was more like the philosophy of the Republicans in modern times..
http://www.livescience.com/34241-democr ... forms.html
#242852 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Wed May 06, 2015 3:26 pm
Dayne Nobody IV wrote:only one flaw in your argument Slacker, the philosophy and agenda of the Democrats when the KKK was birthed was more like the philosophy of the Republicans in modern times..
http://www.livescience.com/34241-democr ... forms.html




Obviously facts don't matter to a Democrat but that's pure horse-hockey!

I grew up in a Klan town. We had a KKK bookstore on Main Street until 1973, there are still no black in that city, though the Clinton Administration made an effort to de-segregate it.

Do you know we're consistently the only blue county in Texas? Pure Democrat. I was one of them until I moved out at age 20 and started to see the world.
#242853 by DainNobody
Wed May 06, 2015 3:33 pm
Ted, are you saying my comment was horse-hockey, or that science is horse-hockey? I've know for years that the Democrats and Republicans basically switched platforms some time between 1860 to 1935, but I am surprised by how many people are ignorant of that..
#242854 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Wed May 06, 2015 3:38 pm
Planetguy wrote:i said it before....no one is attacking "freedom speech". (as much as you and your team want to pound that narrative into the ground)

i believe that idiot, geller and her hate group are entitled to their's.:



Thank you for being reasonable. But if you truly support the protection of free speech, then you support protecting the people speaking also.

If it's a flag burning gay parade and a "righty" shows up to kill someone, then reasonable people should agree that person deserves whatever he gets once it goes to violence.

I've had opportunity to meet Geert Wilders, I turned it down. He's a polarizing controversial figure in Holland, and indeed all of the EU, but I support his right to speak against the intimidation tactics of the Islamists. If they can shout "Death to America" in the streets and call it "free speech rights" then Geert has much leeway because he's never said "Death to Muslims" even once.
#242855 by Badstrat
Wed May 06, 2015 3:40 pm
I know you are having a hard time digesting it, however the article is about the FOUNDING of the KKK and who the demoncrat party chose as their minority leader.

And as to your comment, the demoncrat party remains the oppressor of the black man, they oppress him simply to keep him as a staple of their voting base.

You comment has nothing to do with my post.
#242856 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Wed May 06, 2015 3:42 pm
Dayne Nobody IV wrote:Ted, are you saying my comment was horse-hockey, or that science is horse-hockey? I've know for years that the Democrats and Republicans basically switched platforms some time between 1860 to 1935, but I am surprised by how many people are ignorant of that..



Dayne, Kennedy and LBJ both worked to kill the the Civil Rights Bill when REPUBLICANS first proposed it in the late 1950s

Republicans supported civil rights because they believe in freedom and equality for all. This myth of a party switch in 1964 is just that, a myth.

The democrats were already the party of big government progressives in the days of Woodrow Wilson and FDR. At the same time they were pushing the IRS, Social Security and the New Deal, they were actively suppressing the rights of blacks. The democrats did not become republicans. Racism simply became unpopular, so the democrat quit openly displaying their racial hatred because it was no longer politically prudent.

The republicans certainly didn't take up the banner of racial hatred after the public turned against what they had always been against. They opposed some progressive power grabs that the democrats tried to cloak in civil rights legislation. But not the civil rights themselves. The democrats decided in the 60's that it was easier to buy the black vote by expanding welfare than to suppress it through terrorism. It was a change of tactics, not ideology.

But republicans, the same party that supported low taxes, small government and personal liberty, pushed the civil right movement forward and led the congress in voting for the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Republicans today still believe in those principals. And democrats still believe in the principals they practiced before the civil rights act. There was no great change of the parties. That is just something democrats say to hide the shame of their history, disparage their enemies, and claim credit for things they had no part in.
Last edited by t-Roy and The Smoking Section on Wed May 06, 2015 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
#242857 by DainNobody
Wed May 06, 2015 3:49 pm
Badstrat wrote:I know you are having a hard time digesting it, however the article is about the FOUNDING of the KKK and who the demoncrat party chose as their minority leader.

And as to your comment, the demoncrat party remains the oppressor of the black man, they oppress him simply to keep him as a staple of their voting base.

You comment has nothing to do with my post.
no problem whatsoever digesting your comment about the fact Democrats are responsible for inventing the KKK, I am just saying, that the Democrats back then, were the same philosophically as today's modern Republicans.. so in reality you could say modern day Republican beliefs are responsible for inventing the KKK, because as the news source link points out, the DEMOCRATS of old, are like the REPUBLICANS in today's world
Last edited by DainNobody on Wed May 06, 2015 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest