J-HALEY wrote:Planetguy wrote:Starfish Scott wrote:This place is loaded with knowledge. (The trick is to be able to disseminate the good material(s) from the bad).
why, just yesterday i got learned.... that there ronnie raygun fella was responsible for saving all of us good folks from having to speak russkie w that there in genie us star wars deefence pogrom of his !!!
Cap'n the post above is a classic example of "the bad" progressive political bating at best. 
jeff...that's your choice if you want to interpret it that way. ( and i know nine times outta ten...that's how you will).
but honestly (believe it or not), my intention was not to bait anyone. as far as i am and was concerned....i don't need any more conversation or discussion about reagen's merits or faults.
i was simply weighing in w my (albeit sarcastic and smartass) views on his accomplishments after one of your team felt the need to canonize him and credit him w saving us from Ivan's evil threat (which as Talbot explained....really wasn't much of a threat at all by that time)
as to you guys using the TACTIC of tossing the term "progressive tactics" around left and right whenever you think it scores you some points...that TACTIC always cracks my $hit up.
like i said above.....i expressed my views on the subject in a sarcastic and smartass way. (which you wrongly interpreted as baiting).
now...lemme ask you a question. sarcastic and smartass comments are a "PROGRESSIVE TACTIC"???????
nah.....i've heard and read too many conservatives do EXACTLY the same thing.....even here on BM.
pretty much everything i've heard blasted as a "progressive tactic" is exactly the same behavior engaged in by those in both camps.
and to lay it off on one side or the other is just like accusing someone else of engaging in behavior that they regularly do themselves....or projecting their feelings (of anger for instance) upon someone else.
i hope you give that some thought, bro.
