This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#228255 by Planetguy
Tue Jan 07, 2014 1:28 am
GLENNY J wrote:I guess your asss must be puckering from all the love making between you and mark. Go back and read if you can... He accused ME of writing post #5. AS IF IT MATTERED. I thought post # 5 was EXCELLENT.


ok...that an easy enough way to settle things.

WHERE EXACTLY DID I ACCUSE YOU OF WRITING POST #5????

now scroll up and show us all where i said that.

and prove you're NOT a lying sack of exrement. failure to do so proves otherwise!

#228256 by Planetguy
Tue Jan 07, 2014 1:32 am
GLENNY J wrote:AND IT IS EVEN SIMPLER... I DID NOT WRITE IT!

WHAT A BUNCH OF &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& :lol:


vinnyviolin wrote:
Nobody said you wrote that post. It was your staunch defense of it's author (Slacker) that was the reason it was cited.

Duh!


glen, congratulations you play a very convincing dolt. (practice makes perfect i guess)

still, as good a performance as it is...it's lacking. and no one's buying it. :wink:

#228258 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Tue Jan 07, 2014 1:46 am
Planetguy wrote:
GLENNY J wrote:You are proving you are not man enough to answer my simple question.

Thanks mark.


"simple" ????

everything ABOUT you is simple. ....and clearly you're simply dishonest.

spare us all your usual diversionary turn-around weak tea.

i've asked two or three times about the attacks in Post #5. and you SIMPLY CAN'T frame a response. how could you?

by now you've made it clear enough. you have no problem w "slurs" and "attacks" when you or your nose warmer are handing them out. and it's only when YOU get called out that you start crying like a little nancy about 'em.

you play by two sets of rules....just like all dishonest scoundrels.

SIMPLY enough....by now, i've made THAT point clear enough.

so, i'll now take my boot off your throat, show some mercy, let you up, and you can walk away w whatever little dignity you dishonest folks cling to.

i understand....you play the cards you're dealt. but boy, did you get some shitty cards. of course you dealt them to yourself.



Actually that was very clever. It only proves what a devious lying mutha fuuccckin sack of shiiit little commie boy, jewish supremacist, you are.

You actually went out of your way to ALLUDE that I attacked you. Talk about underhanded and using a totally progressive tactic.

You really should be ashamed of yourself. Now since you are being so vulgar and violent... Go have a good time with vinny. :lol:

STILL WANT TO STEP ON MY THROAT?

#228274 by VinnyViolin
Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:41 am
GLENNY J wrote:
Planetguy wrote:
GLENNY J wrote:You are proving you are not man enough to answer my simple question.

Thanks mark.


"simple" ????

everything ABOUT you is simple. ....and clearly you're simply dishonest.

spare us all your usual diversionary turn-around weak tea.

i've asked two or three times about the attacks in Post #5. and you SIMPLY CAN'T frame a response. how could you?

by now you've made it clear enough. you have no problem w "slurs" and "attacks" when you or your nose warmer are handing them out. and it's only when YOU get called out that you start crying like a little nancy about 'em.

you play by two sets of rules....just like all dishonest scoundrels.

SIMPLY enough....by now, i've made THAT point clear enough.

so, i'll now take my boot off your throat, show some mercy, let you up, and you can walk away w whatever little dignity you dishonest folks cling to.

i understand....you play the cards you're dealt. but boy, did you get some shitty cards. of course you dealt them to yourself.



Actually that was very clever. It only proves what a devious lying mutha fuuccckin sack of shiiit little commie boy, jewish supremacist, you are.

You actually went out of your way to ALLUDE that I attacked you. Talk about underhanded and using a totally progressive tactic.

You really should be ashamed of yourself. Now since you are being so vulgar and violent... Go have a good time with vinny. :lol:

STILL WANT TO STEP ON MY THROAT?


Funny, nobody else seemed to be confused by what you claim to be an ALLUSION ..

It would rather appear to be your own DELUSION.

In fact you really sound like (to paraphrase Slacker here) Comprehension-ally Challenged conservative ... or in other words a Another uninformed thoughtless conservative :lol:

Wipe that brown stuff out of your eyes and read Planetguy' last post again and you will see that he has removed the boot from your throat already!
Planetguy wrote:so, i'll now take my boot off your throat, show some mercy, let you up, and you can walk away w whatever little dignity you dishonest folks cling to.

#228275 by VinnyViolin
Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:56 am
For all you poorly informed conservatives who are so fixated exclusively on the present presidential puppet Obama.

The first books written to expose Obama were written by a very thoughtful and well informed leftist :oops:
Last edited by VinnyViolin on Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

#228311 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Wed Jan 08, 2014 1:08 am
GLENNY J wrote:
Planetguy wrote:
GLENNY J wrote:You are proving you are not man enough to answer my simple question.

Thanks mark.


"simple" ????

everything ABOUT you is simple. ....and clearly you're simply dishonest.

spare us all your usual diversionary turn-around weak tea.

i've asked two or three times about the attacks in Post #5. and you SIMPLY CAN'T frame a response. how could you?

by now you've made it clear enough. you have no problem w "slurs" and "attacks" when you or your nose warmer are handing them out. and it's only when YOU get called out that you start crying like a little nancy about 'em.

you play by two sets of rules....just like all dishonest scoundrels.

SIMPLY enough....by now, i've made THAT point clear enough.

so, i'll now take my boot off your throat, show some mercy, let you up, and you can walk away w whatever little dignity you dishonest folks cling to.

i understand....you play the cards you're dealt. but boy, did you get some shitty cards. of course you dealt them to yourself.



Actually that was very clever. It only proves what a devious lying mutha fuuccckin sack of shiiit little commie boy, jewish supremacist, you are.

You actually went out of your way to ALLUDE that I attacked you. Talk about underhanded and using a totally progressive tactic.

You really should be ashamed of yourself. Now since you are being so vulgar and violent... Go have a good time with vinny. :lol:

STILL WANT TO STEP ON MY THROAT?



You are a very violent person. Especially when you don't get your way. You are even closer to sounding like dennis rodman... Totally out of control.

Why don't you go get a real job instead of being the little commie boy critic waiting for the government to steal from me... To give to you.

You lose dude. You will always be a loser.

#228341 by Planetguy
Wed Jan 08, 2014 2:25 pm
GLENNY J wrote:You are a very violent person.


and you remain a liar. a liar is someone who make erroneous claims and refuses to back them up w examples.


Why don't you go get a real job instead of being the little commie boy critic waiting for the government to steal from me... To give to you.



well, I've never tried to cheat the IRS out of money that was owed them.

but we've all known cheats and dishonest hypocrites who do that (steal).

then they get caught....they have to pay what they were supposed to in the first place and they get a chip on their shoulder about the gov't and forever whine about the evil gov't. "oh the gov't screwed me over!"

me, i've never lied about my earnings, never played games trying to rip anyone off, and so the gov't has never had any reason to come after me.

You lose dude. You will always be a loser.


nah, i'm a WINNER. and because you're a very small, petty, and unfulfilled little boy....that drives you batty.

live with it. :wink:

#228358 by Slacker G
Wed Jan 08, 2014 4:10 pm
So where are the secret police in Diablo care? The SS in Germany were called the Gestapo. The name does not say "WHAT they do but rather WHAT they ARE. Secret Police. With no definite definition of what this force does It smells of Gestapo.

http://www.nolanchart.com/article10591- ... ocssf-html

What is the Obama Care Secret Security Force O.C.S.S.F?

November 17, 2013 by Mark Vogl 0 Comments

Congressman Louie Gohmert, Texas 1st Congressional District, has opened an inquiry into the secret security forces included in the 2500 page Obama Care Law.

This revelation in combination with Barrack Obama’s statement that there is a need for civilian security force equal in strength to the Armed Forces adds real concern for the future liberty of this nation. I have never, in my entire life, including nine years as a Regular Army officer, and nine years as a high level (policy influencer) aide to a New York State Senator ever heard the term “martial law” used as much as it has been in the Obama Administration.

The fact that an experienced and senior Congressman, in the person of Louie Gohmert, would introduce concern over the idea of a secret undiscussed, unnecessary police force within the Department of Health Services with Top Secret Clearances makes this new revelation a potentially serious threat to the liberty of the citizens of the United States. When you consider the large number of senior military officers relieved from duty by the Obama Administration and the extra legal actions of the Obama Administration it would seem time for Speaker Boehner, or his replacement to freeze all spending on Obama Care and any funds for a secret Police force while a full-fledged investigation was commenced.

It is clearly time to remember from Andrew Jackson’s Farewell Address in 1837:

“But you must remember, my fellow citizens, that eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty; and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing.”

“You no longer have any cause to fear danger from abroad, your strength and power are well known throughout the civilized world, as well as the high and gallant bearing of your sons. It is from within, among yourselves – from cupidity, from corruption, from disappointed ambition and inordinate thirst for power – that factions will be formed and liberty endangered.”

It is time for the main stream media, the conservative talk show hosts, and the state’s governors to take seriously this new found threat. Why would such a force be included in the massive “health care” legislation? What is its purpose? Why were we not told about it? What is supposed to be its authorized numbers? Where are the applications for these jobs? Are they civil service, or politically appointed? What kind of salaries and benefit packages are we talking about?

Folks this complete surprise should worry you. Congressman Louie Gohmert is a credible source. He is a long time Congressman, previously a judge and former Army officer.

#228363 by Planetguy
Wed Jan 08, 2014 4:59 pm
"It is from within, among yourselves – from cupidity, from corruption, from disappointed ambition and inordinate thirst for power – that factions will be formed and liberty endangered.” -andrew jackson

Image

#228365 by Starfish Scott
Wed Jan 08, 2014 6:13 pm
Just remember that Dennis Rodman can now flee to North Korea if he decides to go on a homicidal rampage and throw his girlfriend off the roof..et cetera.

(Time to Jet, not sure when I am coming back, man..)

"No Extradition in North Korea". lol

#228367 by VinnyViolin
Wed Jan 08, 2014 6:39 pm
Slacker G wrote:I have never, in my entire life, including nine years as a Regular Army officer, and nine years as a high level (policy influencer) aide to a New York State Senator ever heard the term martial law used as much as it has been in the Obama Administration.

Obviously you, and the senator you were lobbying for, did not hold sufficient security clearances needed to know of such secret goings on.

Rex 84
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was an alleged classified "scenario and drill" developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution, declare martial law, place military commanders in charge of state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens who are deemed to be "national security threats", in the event that the President declares a "State of National Emergency". The plan states, events causing such a declaration would be widespread U.S. opposition to a U.S. military invasion abroad, such as if the United States were to directly invade Central America.[1][2][3][4][5] To combat what the government perceived as "subversive activities", the plan also authorized the military to direct ordered movements of civilian populations at state and regional levels.[6]

Rex 84 was supposedly written by Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North, who was both National Security Council White House Aide, and NSC liaison to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and John Brinkerhoff, the deputy director of "national preparedness" programs for the FEMA. They patterned the plan on a 1970 report written by FEMA chief Louis Giuffrida, at the Army War College, which proposed the detention of up to 21 million "American Negroes", if there were a black militant uprising in the United States.[1][7] Existence of a master military contingency plan (of which REX-84 was a part), "Garden Plot" and a similar earlier exercise, "Lantern Spike", were originally revealed by journalist Ron Ridenhour, who summarized his findings in an article in CounterSpy.[8]

Transcripts from the Iran-Contra Hearings in 1987 record the following dialogue between Congressman Jack Brooks, Oliver North's attorney Brendan Sullivan and Senator Daniel Inouye, the Democratic Chair of the joint Senate-House Committee:[9]

[Congressman Jack] Brooks: Colonel North, in your work at the N.S.C. were you not assigned, at one time, to work on plans for the continuity of government in the event of a major disaster?

Brendan Sullivan [North's counsel, agitatedly]: Mr. Chairman?

[Senator Daniel] Inouye: I believe that question touches upon a highly sensitive and classified area so may I request that you not touch upon that?

Brooks: I was particularly concerned, Mr. Chairman, because I read in Miami papers, and several others, that there had been a plan developed, by that same agency, a contingency plan in the event of emergency, that would suspend the American constitution. And I was deeply concerned about it and wondered if that was an area in which he had worked. I believe that it was and I wanted to get his confirmation.

Inouye: May I most respectfully request that that matter not be touched upon at this stage. If we wish to get into this, I'm certain arrangements can be made for an executive session.


http://youtu.be/FbFHuGlZsVU

#228386 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Wed Jan 08, 2014 11:55 pm
Planetguy wrote:
GLENNY J wrote:You are a very violent person.


and you remain a liar. a liar is someone who make erroneous claims and refuses to back them up w examples.


Why don't you go get a real job instead of being the little commie boy critic waiting for the government to steal from me... To give to you.



well, I've never tried to cheat the IRS out of money that was owed them.

but we've all known cheats and dishonest hypocrites who do that (steal).

then they get caught....they have to pay what they were supposed to in the first place and they get a chip on their shoulder about the gov't and forever whine about the evil gov't. "oh the gov't screwed me over!"

me, i've never lied about my earnings, never played games trying to rip anyone off, and so the gov't has never had any reason to come after me.

You lose dude. You will always be a loser.


nah, i'm a WINNER. and because you're a very small, petty, and unfulfilled little boy....that drives you batty.

live with it. :wink:


Now you are claiming that You have never cheated the IRS. That is a good thing. I am proud of you. We are shoulder to shoulder on that one. The only difference is it seems I have income to claim. You should get a JOB.
Again you alluding to PURE BULLLL SHHHIIITTT. You do that often.

The fact remains you have threatened to put your boot on my throat and give me a good asss whooping. If you think I am lying as such... If I call you a violent person... Well then maybe that is why I don't like little commie boy progressives.

I know you are very smart, but instead you show me your STUPIDITY, and VIOLENT NATURE WHEN YOU DON'T GET YOUR WAY. HHHHMMMMMM!

#228387 by MikeTalbot
Thu Jan 09, 2014 12:10 am
Planet

Your cartoon is sort of a joke - but certainly not accurate. The Republican party hates the Tea Party probably more than the democrats do.

Which sort of makes my point that there are NOT two parties in Washington - just a big Potemkin village to amuse the losers / voters and give the media something to talk about (other than real issues).

Talbot

#228388 by MikeTalbot
Thu Jan 09, 2014 12:11 am
Planet

Your cartoon is sort of a joke - but certainly not accurate. The Republican party hates the Tea Party probably more than the democrats do.

Which sort of makes my point that there are NOT two parties in Washington - just a big Potemkin village to amuse the losers / voters and give the media something to talk about (other than real issues).

Talbot

#228389 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Thu Jan 09, 2014 12:13 am
Planetguy wrote: "It is from within, among yourselves – from cupidity, from corruption, from disappointed ambition and inordinate thirst for power – that factions will be formed and liberty endangered.” -andrew jackson

Image


Good quote except the picture should be changed to be obama with the club and if he beats the useless republican lying traitor assssholes over the head... WHO CARES.

LIBERTY IS ENDANGERED. WE HAVE ALLOWED A FEW TO CONTROL THE MASSES.

Funny how you would pick such a violent cartoon... Your true spirit is showing through, MARK.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest