The first bail out I understand was in a hurry, but an immediate afterthought could have been paying the homeowners instead. The banks would still get their money, a bail out from the bottom up. The big difference is those folks get to keep their homes. I’m talking about conservative 20/30yr loans with a good appraisal and not ARM, or interests only.
No bank will ever pass on a way to profit, if you want them to fail, simply let greed do its thing. And who is more of an authority on risk then the central bank and our own government?
I still get a kick out of how they designated an army unit specifically for “domestic deployment” several days before the first bailout, what a joke and the media still doesn’t get it? As if the National Guard doesn’t have a purpose. The logic is pretty clear if the intention were anything different, the political geniuses would have delayed it, because of the mere appearance of how it could look. The fact they did take such extreme precautions, does relate to the seriousness of the situation from the governmental view.
Can you imagine how shocked they were when nobody did anything at all? On a side note Iceland literally had a complete revolution based on renegotiating their debt. If you look it up you’ll see more than one protest about how they had a total revolution and news of it be missing in our main stream media. It must have been back when Charlie Sheen was “world news”. Obviously Iceland and the US are different animals not to say it would work here, just that even the mention of “debt” and “revolution” in the same report would be enough to launch the drones.
Well as they say: “No news, is world news”.
Nah they don’t say that, but they should.