sanshouheil wrote:I do not know what made a difference in the soldiers response between WWI, WWII, and Nam.
It certainly was not "more barbaric" . . .
Seeing a man burned slowly to death, skinned alive, or a baby having it's brains beat out with a rifle butt is no different in 1903 or 1963.
I feel that the difference may have been the mind set of those engaged and of the oblivion of those whom were not.
I have worked with many a Vet from WWII, Korea, & Nam.
The only two real differences I have observed is the way in which they dealt with the horrors in which they participated is that the men from 1940 1950 era believed whole heartily in what they were doing.
And they believed the only reason they came home was God willed it so.
Perhaps they were fortunate in not knowing the full extent of the corruption in their own government. Or perhaps they knew they had "moral" support from their countrymen.
One man summed it up thus:
"We were met at t he docks by our wives whom had worked in the shipyards to provide us with the means to win, our sons were met in the airports by dope head whores, who spit at them for giving them freedom"
Each war had its share of atrocity . But, the fundamental difference between WWI/II and Nam is two words:
Geneva Convention.. Most people who didnt serve during that era or the present, are not aware of the importance behind it. The Geneva convention outlined certain rules for warfare, and enemies agreed to recognize and follow accordingly. This addressed how POWs were treated on both sides. Among things, It also outlined behaviors and practices for the winning side. In WWII a fella could stand the chance of successfully waving a white flag, bring amenities with him, have tea with the enemy, discuss why each side should give up, and be sent back to the other side, relatively assured he wouldn't get shot in the back. ...before the fire fight ensued.
Not so in Vietnam. Charlie had no room for mercy, no need to spare diginity and no need to exercise civility. They did not recognize or honor Geneva Convention. The warfare tactics were brand new to us. To Charlie, all enemy was fair game and treated with extreme prejudice...Win at all costs. (How many nazi woman tossed loaded babies at the armored division?)
Were there exceptions to this?, Sure there were.... but pound for pound, 'shell-shock' had a whole different meaning for each era.
Then , if you add the other factors: WWII solders recieved a big welcome home. Nam...SOldeirs were rejected and virtually spit on. these dynmics impacted soldiers of each era, respectively.
Bob's brother faced endless scrutiny and discrimination when he came home...(that's a fact) On top of his PTSD condition. The best thing Bob could have ever done (and he did) was to be his brother's champion, if only to protect his brother from the hippie assholes that would shun him.