This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#214238 by J-HALEY
Wed May 08, 2013 2:55 pm
jimmydanger wrote:They were doing a dangerous job in a dangerous place during a dangerous time. A policeman goes to work everyday knowing he might not come home. Same with these folks. It was a terrible incident but remember, we are at war with these people. There's going to be lots of casualties on both sides. But coverup? Pffft.


They are at war with us but because of the liberal anchor weighing this country down we are unable to war back at them. By that I mean the attitude of "this was not an organized attack".

#214240 by jimmydanger
Wed May 08, 2013 3:20 pm
We're unable to war back? Again, pffft. We rain down death from the sky everyday, sometimes killing innocent women and children. We have killed far more people in the middle east in the past ten years than they have killed of us. Save your 'liberal media' BS, I'm not buying it. I watch CNN because I trust it, I watch Fox when I want a laugh.

#214242 by Kramerguy
Wed May 08, 2013 3:38 pm
J-HALEY wrote:
jimmydanger wrote:They were doing a dangerous job in a dangerous place during a dangerous time. A policeman goes to work everyday knowing he might not come home. Same with these folks. It was a terrible incident but remember, we are at war with these people. There's going to be lots of casualties on both sides. But coverup? Pffft.


They are at war with us but because of the liberal anchor weighing this country down we are unable to war back at them. By that I mean the attitude of "this was not an organized attack".


Haley, if your entire family was killed when your house exploded, by a Muslim drone attack, would you not seek revenge? Let's say 50 of your neighbors had the same problem, and there's a muslim embassy in the next town over.. would you not be compelled to take matters into your own hand, regardless of your governments assurances?

I'm patiently awaiting these "explosive" whistleblower testimonies, and I expect largely they will be focused on the blunders following the event, rather than the event itself.

I'm having difficulty understanding which you are focused on, much less why. Jimmy said it right- we have clearly invited terrorism by our own actions. The more we try to combat it with a strong-arm approach, the more we only succeed in creating more terrorists. Or do you disagree?

#214244 by Starfish Scott
Wed May 08, 2013 3:44 pm
lol ouch..

#214246 by J-HALEY
Wed May 08, 2013 4:26 pm
Kramerguy wrote:
J-HALEY wrote:
jimmydanger wrote:They were doing a dangerous job in a dangerous place during a dangerous time. A policeman goes to work everyday knowing he might not come home. Same with these folks. It was a terrible incident but remember, we are at war with these people. There's going to be lots of casualties on both sides. But coverup? Pffft.


They are at war with us but because of the liberal anchor weighing this country down we are unable to war back at them. By that I mean the attitude of "this was not an organized attack".


Haley, if your entire family was killed when your house exploded, by a Muslim drone attack, would you not seek revenge? Let's say 50 of your neighbors had the same problem, and there's a muslim embassy in the next town over.. would you not be compelled to take matters into your own hand, regardless of your governments assurances?

I'm patiently awaiting these "explosive" whistleblower testimonies, and I expect largely they will be focused on the blunders following the event, rather than the event itself.

I'm having difficulty understanding which you are focused on, much less why. Jimmy said it right- we have clearly invited terrorism by our own actions. The more we try to combat it with a strong-arm approach, the more we only succeed in creating more terrorists. Or do you disagree?


This is exactly what I mean by liberal anchor. It is our fault that terrorist attack innocent victims. :roll:

#214253 by J-HALEY
Wed May 08, 2013 7:31 pm
jimmydanger wrote:We're unable to war back? Again, pffft. We rain down death from the sky everyday, sometimes killing innocent women and children. We have killed far more people in the middle east in the past ten years than they have killed of us. Save your 'liberal media' BS, I'm not buying it. I watch CNN because I trust it, I watch Fox when I want a laugh.


Yeah Jimmy, when you use woman and children as human shields sh*t happens. :roll:

#214255 by jimmydanger
Wed May 08, 2013 7:46 pm
Women and children don't make very good shields against cruise missiles. By your logic, women and children shouldn't have been at the Boston Marathon either.

#214256 by J-HALEY
Wed May 08, 2013 7:58 pm
jimmydanger wrote:Women and children don't make very good shields against cruise missiles. By your logic, women and children shouldn't have been at the Boston Marathon either.


Nice twisting my meaning around! That's another perfect example of a liberal anchor comment. You know what I meant Jimmy. Your a smart guy!

#214311 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Thu May 09, 2013 10:40 pm
J-HALEY wrote:
jimmydanger wrote:Women and children don't make very good shields against cruise missiles. By your logic, women and children shouldn't have been at the Boston Marathon either.


Nice twisting my meaning around! That's another perfect example of a liberal anchor comment. You know what I meant Jimmy. Your a smart guy!


Yeah really!!! Nice twisting!

Actually Jimmy is defending ridiculous positions...

You have to give him credit for trying. :)

#214312 by ANGELSSHOTGUN
Thu May 09, 2013 11:03 pm
Kramerguy wrote:
J-HALEY wrote:
jimmydanger wrote:They were doing a dangerous job in a dangerous place during a dangerous time. A policeman goes to work everyday knowing he might not come home. Same with these folks. It was a terrible incident but remember, we are at war with these people. There's going to be lots of casualties on both sides. But coverup? Pffft.


They are at war with us but because of the liberal anchor weighing this country down we are unable to war back at them. By that I mean the attitude of "this was not an organized attack".


Haley, if your entire family was killed when your house exploded, by a Muslim drone attack, would you not seek revenge? Let's say 50 of your neighbors had the same problem, and there's a muslim embassy in the next town over.. would you not be compelled to take matters into your own hand, regardless of your governments assurances?

I'm patiently awaiting these "explosive" whistleblower testimonies, and I expect largely they will be focused on the blunders following the event, rather than the event itself.

I'm having difficulty understanding which you are focused on, much less why. Jimmy said it right- we have clearly invited terrorism by our own actions. The more we try to combat it with a strong-arm approach, the more we only succeed in creating more terrorists. Or do you disagree?


You are serious about this?...
This is all just total proof of a government that wants all of us to race to the safety of protection.
Health care let big gov do it.
Jobs let big gov do it.
I could go on and on.

Instead our government has directed us all to become cowering imbeciles directed by the few, affecting the spirit of all free men. STRIP SEARCH.

I am truly sorry that you can not see this. I will still speak on, for your freedom... Until my last breath.

#214357 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Fri May 10, 2013 1:48 pm
Kramerguy wrote:I'm patiently awaiting these "explosive" whistleblower testimonies, and I expect largely they will be focused on the blunders following the event, rather than the event itself.



http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/20 ... eferences/

If you check out that article, you'll see that they changed the story at least 12 times after the fact, so in some regard you are correct.

But the fact that they felt the need to lie to us should say that there is fire underneath all the smoke.

Then you have reports that Democrats are trying to undermine the testimony of eye witnesses, instead of listening to it and allowing the truth to come out, though it may reveal treason. Shameful is the only word to describe it.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/dem ... 22036.html





I'm having difficulty understanding which you are focused on, much less why. Jimmy said it right- we have clearly invited terrorism by our own actions. The more we try to combat it with a strong-arm approach, the more we only succeed in creating more terrorists. Or do you disagree?




That's like saying a woman wants to be raped if she wears a mini-skirt. Ridiculous.

Yes, we had damn sure better be fighting them. It's all they understand.

Unless you want to become a dhimmi and have you daughters wearing burkas?





.

#214368 by Kramerguy
Fri May 10, 2013 2:39 pm
I've seen very little reporting on the whistleblower testimony.. and what I've seen so far has been wholly underwhelming. Where's the smoking gun they touted? Is the media asleep or something? Here's what turns up searching the last 24 hours-

http://www.examiner.com/article/media-p ... er-hearing

Outside perspective-
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22475301

Still.. underwhelming. I'd like to also note that this "conspiracy" should absolutely be fleshed out and guilt assigned and prosecuted if crimes were committed, but also that this honestly seems to pale in comparison to the crimes of the recession (bankster fraud, govt supported (fraud in itself), as well as Bush administration using lies and false evidence to invade countries causing hundreds of thousands of deaths, not just four.

We have no perspective when it comes to justice anymore.

#214381 by t-Roy and The Smoking Section
Fri May 10, 2013 6:54 pm
Kramerguy wrote:I've seen very little reporting on the whistleblower testimony.. and what I've seen so far has been wholly underwhelming. Where's the smoking gun they touted? Is the media asleep or something? Here's what turns up searching the last 24 hours-

http://www.examiner.com/article/media-p ... er-hearing





You have now proven that you aren't even paying attention.

The link you posted is summed up by the first line in the news article which says:

A devastating six hours of testimony by tenured State Department officials turns into a night of back-burner media status for a historic day on Capitol Hill.

As if an episode of the Twilight-Zone came to fruition however, after a day on Capitol Hill that could go down in the annals as one that may change the course of political history in the United States forever and possibly effect the entire world on a profound level, the entire media in the United States decided to instead pretend as if a day-old kidnapping rescue story and the result of a murder trial were much more important to cover.




The very point of the article how much content and scandal were in the testimony and yet the mainstream media is ignoring it as if there wasn't.

yes, that's the point of this thread that apparently you are missing




this honestly seems to pale in comparison to the crimes of the recession (bankster fraud, govt supported (fraud in itself),


Then why aren't you calling for Chris Dodd and Barney Frank and Bill Clinton and all the Wall Street bankers in Obama's cabinet to be wearing orange jump suits in an 8x8 cell?

Because you weren't paying attention to the details of that one either if you think it's Bush's fault.






Bush administration using lies and false evidence to invade countries causing hundreds of thousands of deaths, not just four.

We have no perspective when it comes to justice anymore.


Rather hypocritical to blame Bush for this since everyone on Capitol Hill had the same information and voted for the action. I supported taking Saddam out completely, which was the only thing I agreed with Bush on for 8 years.

If you think it was about Iraq alone, that would be a mistake. It was about taking out Saddam and then isolating Iran with fronts on both of it's borders, while cutting them off from Syria. The whole mess is about protecting the royal family of Saud.

But unlike the current occupant of the White House, Bush told everyone what he was going to do, allowed the political process and a vote from both Houses of Congress, and then did exactly what he said.

Got to respect an honest man even if you don't like what he does.

.
Last edited by t-Roy and The Smoking Section on Fri May 10, 2013 7:09 pm, edited 5 times in total.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests