Slacker G wrote: Any freedom you have, if you are unarmed, is at the sufferance of the men with the guns. It's sadly just that simple.
Which is exactly why potus has an armed segment for every division of government from the Dpt of education to DHS. You will find an armed force at every level of government. And no one will explain why.
I would suggest that these comprise the "Civilian Force larger than the Military" that he said he wanted while he was campaigning the first time around.
You guys are just pointing out the whole conundrum the radical left have. History has shown REPEATEDLY... You can not control an armed population.
Even with WMD, Chemical weapons,(Syria), human will is an indomitable factor. Mano a Mano. You may kill me... but I shall never cower in fear... And death will always just be an inevitable transition. However control of a government NOT sanctioned by me and FREEMEN through out America,will always be intolerable. (this is not about voting, this is about twisting the whole process. This is about politicians and CORPORATIONS, protecting their privileges above the rights of the individual)
As far as an armed population... There are probably more guns and ammo stored privately, than the US government could ever store. I only say this to stop the radical left from making a major mistake... Never underestimate the people you wish to engage in conflict.
Tanks and drones and nuclear weapons will never replace the need for individual control... That only comes from boots on the ground, and... guns.
Don't argue with a stupid person. They will pull you down to their level... And beat you with experience..."Samuel Langhorne Clemens"