General Music Chat

social orders are built on the family, the progressive nuclear family, not on sodomites undertaking psychological experiments on surplus and abandoned children.
homosexual men are already in a state of maturity malfunction.
so they are unlikely to undertake parenting to any degree worth discussing.
homosexuality is a genetic death sentence.
so a healthy minds, as a rule do not consider homosexual permanence.

social order as a rule ignore groups of women in caretaking roles.
birds, cats, orphans what have you.

get a group of sodomites together under the auspicious of training their replacements,
and you will have violent civil action.

You can file this information back in your ass, where you pulled it from.

BTW, why did you delete your profile image?
Anything is better than a blank silhouette.

social orders are built on the family, the progressive nuclear family, not on sodomites undertaking psychological experiments on surplus and abandoned children.
homosexual men are already in a state of maturity malfunction.
so they are unlikely to undertake parenting to any degree worth discussing.
homosexuality is a genetic death sentence.
so a healthy minds, as a rule do not consider homosexual permanence.

social order as a rule ignore groups of women in caretaking roles.
birds, cats, orphans what have you.

get a group of sodomites together under the auspicious of training their replacements,
and you will have violent civil action.

so were the Amazons just a figment of mythology?..

social orders are built on the family, the progressive nuclear family, not on sodomites undertaking psychological experiments on surplus and abandoned children.
homosexual men are already in a state of maturity malfunction.
so they are unlikely to undertake parenting to any degree worth discussing.
homosexuality is a genetic death sentence.
so a healthy minds, as a rule do not consider homosexual permanence.

social order as a rule ignore groups of women in caretaking roles.
birds, cats, orphans what have you.

get a group of sodomites together under the auspicious of training their replacements,
and you will have violent civil action.

You can file this information back in your ass, where you pulled it from.

BTW, why did you delete your profile image?
Anything is better than a blank silhouette.

I actually knew a couple who were gay and they raised a daughter. For all intents and purposes , she grew up to be okay... Got married (heterosexual) and has kids.

All Jokes and cut-downs to the side .. If we, as human beings are to be honest; Its the "behaviors , driven by an unfamiliar (To us individually) orientation, which many cannot reconcile. Ultra left wing liberals will NEVER accept the scientific theory that homosexuality is an "abnormalcy" in a human make up and in the social bubble. Albeit, no one cant argue JC's point that gaydom is a genetic death sentence.

On the other hand, Ultra-Rights will never accept that gaydom is NOT about immorality. They cant understand the science behind this phenomenon. Most gay people will tell you its not a moral 'choice' of theirs.

The facts are this: Children are actually as safe, if not safer ...in the hands of a gay couple as they are with a straight couples. But, being Straight (or living like it) tends to provide wicked people a license of social freedoms to hide behind.
Being gay is the last impression a straight/pedophile wants for an image, (because of the vigilance of scrutiny against gay people in our society)
Kids are no less safe or morally compromised for having had gay parents, than they are for having had murderers for parents. In fact , ..kids are much safer with the gay parents in that set of choices.

social orders are built on the family, the progressive nuclear family, not on sodomites undertaking psychological experiments on surplus and abandoned children.
homosexual men are already in a state of maturity malfunction.
so they are unlikely to undertake parenting to any degree worth discussing.
homosexuality is a genetic death sentence.
so a healthy minds, as a rule do not consider homosexual permanence.

social order as a rule ignore groups of women in caretaking roles.
birds, cats, orphans what have you.

get a group of sodomites together under the auspicious of training their replacements,
and you will have violent civil action.

so were the Amazons just a figment of mythology?..

cite a relevant fact about amazon culture that implicate this thread.

social orders are built on the family, the progressive nuclear family, not on sodomites undertaking psychological experiments on surplus and abandoned children.
homosexual men are already in a state of maturity malfunction.
so they are unlikely to undertake parenting to any degree worth discussing.
homosexuality is a genetic death sentence.
so a healthy minds, as a rule do not consider homosexual permanence.

social order as a rule ignore groups of women in caretaking roles.
birds, cats, orphans what have you.

get a group of sodomites together under the auspicious of training their replacements,
and you will have violent civil action.

You can file this information back in your ass, where you pulled it from.

BTW, why did you delete your profile image?
Anything is better than a blank silhouette.

I actually knew a couple who were gay and they raised a daughter. For all intents and purposes , she grew up to be okay... Got married (heterosexual) and has kids.

All Jokes and cut-downs to the side .. If we, as human beings are to be honest; Its the "behaviors , driven by an unfamiliar (To us individually) orientation, which many cannot reconcile. Ultra left wing liberals will NEVER accept the scientific theory that homosexuality is an "abnormalcy" in a human make up and in the social bubble. Albeit, no one cant argue JC's point that gaydom is a genetic death sentence.

On the other hand, Ultra-Rights will never accept that gaydom is NOT about immorality. They cant understand the science behind this phenomenon. Most gay people will tell you its not a moral 'choice' of theirs.

The facts are this: Children are actually as safe, if not safer ...in the hands of a gay couple as they are with a straight couples. But, being Straight (or living like it) tends to provide wicked people a license of social freedoms to hide behind.
Being gay is the last impression a straight/pedophile wants for an image, (because of the vigilance of scrutiny against gay people in our society)
Kids are no less safe or morally compromised for having had gay parents, than they are for having had murderers for parents. In fact , ..kids are much safer with the gay parents in that set of choices.

I once did a little research for a college presentation about gender/sexual identity and orientation.

Scientists HAVE found the gene responsible for sexual orientation.
It was actually found while doing cancer research.
It isn't a "gay" gene, though.
You don't switch orientation on-and-off like a light switch.
It is more like a sliding scale, with degrees.
Which makes sense, since physical gender isn't strictly binary either.
Hermaphrodites and transgendered people still exist, too, y'know?

This chart, used in studying transgendered people, might help explain:

social orders are built on the family, the progressive nuclear family, not on sodomites undertaking psychological experiments on surplus and abandoned children.
homosexual men are already in a state of maturity malfunction.
so they are unlikely to undertake parenting to any degree worth discussing.
homosexuality is a genetic death sentence.
so a healthy minds, as a rule do not consider homosexual permanence.

social order as a rule ignore groups of women in caretaking roles.
birds, cats, orphans what have you.

get a group of sodomites together under the auspicious of training their replacements,
and you will have violent civil action.

You can file this information back in your ass, where you pulled it from.

BTW, why did you delete your profile image?
Anything is better than a blank silhouette.

I actually knew a couple who were gay and they raised a daughter. For all intents and purposes , she grew up to be okay... Got married (heterosexual) and has kids.

All Jokes and cut-downs to the side .. If we, as human beings are to be honest; Its the "behaviors , driven by an unfamiliar (To us individually) orientation, which many cannot reconcile. Ultra left wing liberals will NEVER accept the scientific theory that homosexuality is an "abnormalcy" in a human make up and in the social bubble. Albeit, no one cant argue JC's point that gaydom is a genetic death sentence.

On the other hand, Ultra-Rights will never accept that gaydom is NOT about immorality. They cant understand the science behind this phenomenon. Most gay people will tell you its not a moral 'choice' of theirs.

The facts are this: Children are actually as safe, if not safer ...in the hands of a gay couple as they are with a straight couples. But, being Straight (or living like it) tends to provide wicked people a license of social freedoms to hide behind.
Being gay is the last impression a straight/pedophile wants for an image, (because of the vigilance of scrutiny against gay people in our society)
Kids are no less safe or morally compromised for having had gay parents, than they are for having had murderers for parents. In fact , ..kids are much safer with the gay parents in that set of choices.

facts?

what gay culture are you basing this fact on?
what so called gay society has existed for any time at all
where was this exclusive info gathered from
this is of course total crap,
made up out of a few legends that are passed around college dorms.

social orders are built on the family, the progressive nuclear family, not on sodomites undertaking psychological experiments on surplus and abandoned children.
homosexual men are already in a state of maturity malfunction.
so they are unlikely to undertake parenting to any degree worth discussing.
homosexuality is a genetic death sentence.
so a healthy minds, as a rule do not consider homosexual permanence.

social order as a rule ignore groups of women in caretaking roles.
birds, cats, orphans what have you.

get a group of sodomites together under the auspicious of training their replacements,
and you will have violent civil action.

You can file this information back in your ass, where you pulled it from.

BTW, why did you delete your profile image?
Anything is better than a blank silhouette.

I actually knew a couple who were gay and they raised a daughter. For all intents and purposes , she grew up to be okay... Got married (heterosexual) and has kids.

All Jokes and cut-downs to the side .. If we, as human beings are to be honest; Its the "behaviors , driven by an unfamiliar (To us individually) orientation, which many cannot reconcile. Ultra left wing liberals will NEVER accept the scientific theory that homosexuality is an "abnormalcy" in a human make up and in the social bubble. Albeit, no one cant argue JC's point that gaydom is a genetic death sentence.

On the other hand, Ultra-Rights will never accept that gaydom is NOT about immorality. They cant understand the science behind this phenomenon. Most gay people will tell you its not a moral 'choice' of theirs.

The facts are this: Children are actually as safe, if not safer ...in the hands of a gay couple as they are with a straight couples. But, being Straight (or living like it) tends to provide wicked people a license of social freedoms to hide behind.
Being gay is the last impression a straight/pedophile wants for an image, (because of the vigilance of scrutiny against gay people in our society)
Kids are no less safe or morally compromised for having had gay parents, than they are for having had murderers for parents. In fact , ..kids are much safer with the gay parents in that set of choices.

I once did a little research for a college presentation about gender/sexual identity and orientation.

Scientists HAVE found the gene responsible for sexual orientation.
It was actually found while doing cancer research.
It isn't a "gay" gene, though.
You don't switch orientation on-and-off like a light switch.
It is more like a sliding scale, with degrees.
Which makes sense, since physical gender isn't strictly binary either.
Hermaphrodites and transgendered people still exist, too, y'know?

This chart, used in studying transgendered people, might help explain:

total propaganda

without a rich fat lazy social order teetering on the brink of suicide ,
this hogwash cannot thrive.

"Golden Girls": Watch Sophia Change Blanche’s Mind About Gay Marriage In Less Than A Minute
If Sophia had it figured out in 1991, what’s taking this country so long?

http://www.upworthy.com/watch-sophia-change-blanche-s-mind-about-gay-marriage-in-less-than-a-minute?g=2

I thought this was pretty funny.

I heard a black pastor on a talk show today arguing with someone about gay marriage. Why did I point out that he was black? Because the black population appear to be more against it than for it, so it was odd that this pastor preached that it was a good thing.

He was arguing that if Jesus were here today, Jesus would approve of gay relationships and gay marriage. Amazing. They went back and forth for about 15 minutes giving each other scriptural examples for and against it.

The pastor who was for it tried to show that it wasn't a problem in scripture, and that there were no real examples of condemning homosexuality.

Neither one even mentioned Sodom and Gomorrah.

I heard a black pastor on a talk show today arguing with someone about gay marriage. Why did I point out that he was black? Because the black population appear to be more against it than for it, so it was odd that this pastor preached that it was a good thing.

He was arguing that if Jesus were here today, Jesus would approve of gay relationships and gay marriage. Amazing. They went back and forth for about 15 minutes giving each other scriptural examples for and against it.

The pastor who was for it tried to show that it wasn't a problem in scripture, and that there were no real examples of condemning homosexuality.

Neither one even mentioned Sodom and Gomorrah.

A LOT of black folks are deeply homophobic.
I dunno why.

And it is strange when they use the bible to support it, because the bible was also used to support slavery and other injustices to black people.

A) The Bible did not support slavery. It just accepted that there was slavery in the world. As there is to this day. News flash: this is a sinful fallen world. If you've missed this up until now it should be obvious enough for a salamander at this point.

B) Most pedophilia is homosexual men with boys. Sorry but there it is.

C) you've all missed (so far) the real goal of this horror which is to infiltrate and corrupt Christian churches. We will not perform 'gay' marriages. Sorry. But the FedGov pigs desperately want us to - why would that be?

So don't homosexuals deserve the same rights as heterosexuals? Yes they damn sure do under the law - but they have no place pushing their nonsense into our churches which is the ultimate goal. The legal side? Inheritance, insurance and such - absolutely. But don't phuq with our churches because we ain't buying it.

Talbot

because the bible was also used to support slavery and other injustices to black people.

I know that the Bible does support slavery, but it also says that if you can gain your freedom to do it. All through the old testament there were times where Israel was permitted to keep their enemies as slaves opposed to killing them. As far as injustices, not so. Here is a passage that covers both slave and master.

Eph 6:5 Slaves, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling, with a sincere heart, as you would Christ, not by the way of eye-service, as people-pleasers, but as servants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart, rendering service with a good will as to the Lord and not to man,
knowing that whatever good anyone does, this he will receive back from the Lord, whether he is a slave or free.

Eph 6:9 Masters, do the same to them, and stop your threatening, knowing that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and that there is no partiality with him.

Another strange and twisted saying attributed to the Bible "All men are created equal". Not so. Scriptural teaching is contrary to that statement.

People can use the Bible to support whatever their position is, if they take verses out of context or lie about them.

A) The Bible did not support slavery. It just accepted that there was slavery in the world. As there is to this day. News flash: this is a sinful fallen world. If you've missed this up until now it should be obvious enough for a salamander at this point.

B) Most pedophilia is homosexual men with boys. Sorry but there it is.

C) you've all missed (so far) the real goal of this horror which is to infiltrate and corrupt Christian churches. We will not perform 'gay' marriages. Sorry. But the FedGov pigs desperately want us to - why would that be?

So don't homosexuals deserve the same rights as heterosexuals? Yes they damn sure do under the law - but they have no place pushing their nonsense into our churches which is the ultimate goal. The legal side? Inheritance, insurance and such - absolutely. But don't phuq with our churches because we ain't buying it.

Talbot

I do not recall anyone pushing anything into churches.
Some churches are already more/less tolerant than others.
If a church doesn't want to marry someone, then don't.
That is their prerogative.
The legal side is largely what is at issue.
Honestly, I cannot imagine why the government is involved in marriage at all anyway.

Another strange and twisted saying attributed to the Bible "All men are created equal". Not so. Scriptural teaching is contrary to that statement.

That was Thomas Jefferson, when he wrote the Declaration of Independence.


True. The bible has been used to justify almost any behavior imaginable, if you cherry-pick the right verses.