#201540 by Slacker G
Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:46 am
Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:46 am
No not frisky. He just had to display his ignorance and his arrogance. Drones often do that. They wear their stupidity as a badge of honor. 

This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.
Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace
gtZip wrote:Planetguy is feeling frisky.![]()
I say this... Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and the burden of proof is on the one presenting the claim.
So if it needs to be told, and is of great importance, then put the work in to provide the evidence that no belief can ignore.
Make an effort.
gtZip wrote:Paperdog, no sir. The burden of proof is on the accuser. Thems the rules.
When it comes to matters of this world, show me what is known (sources), not what you believe.
jimmydanger wrote:Are you actually saying that Muslims should not be in government? Why? And if you say yes, then no one of religion should be. Only a small fraction of Muslims are fanatical, and I'm hoping that the same is true about Christians, but let's face it if you believe in invisible men in the sky you're already a little touched.
jimmydanger wrote:Are you actually saying that Muslims should not be in government? Why? And if you say yes, then no one of religion should be. Only a small fraction of Muslims are fanatical, and I'm hoping that the same is true about Christians, but let's face it if you believe in invisible men in the sky you're already a little touched.
jimmydanger wrote:Paper, read my question again. I did not ask you if extremists should be allowed in government.
Jeff, what you are starting to think concerns me this much -> .
In case you've been sleepreading, I detest all organized religions but recognize it's your right to practice whatever religion you want in this country. Do you also believe this? I doubt it.
PaperDog wrote:gtZip wrote:Paperdog, no sir. The burden of proof is on the accuser. Thems the rules.
When it comes to matters of this world, show me what is known (sources), not what you believe.
Really? Then by all means, 'prove' the existence of any love you 'feel' or 'believe' you have for your family.
gtZip wrote:Paperdog, no sir. The burden of proof is on the accuser. Thems the rules.
When it comes to matters of this world, show me what is known (sources), not what you believe.
Planetguy wrote: I'm a dumbass who can't deal with reality so ALL I HAVE IS MY BULLSHIP OPINIONS. Let me now prove how stupid I am
yod wrote:gtZip wrote:Paperdog, no sir. The burden of proof is on the accuser. Thems the rules.
When it comes to matters of this world, show me what is known (sources), not what you believe.
This is not "my" accusation. This story has been reported on in several (known) places and I provided links to a couple of blogs that tie them all together so lazy people could get the story in as brief a way as their attention span will allow.
If you wanted to know the truth, you would already be familiar with this story. A few US Senators have been speaking about it publicly for months. Where were you?
I am not going to do your homework for you when you won't even try to address what I've given except to say, "Oh it's anti-Obama so it must not be true"
Will Obama have to put out a press release from the Dept of Propoganda before you'll even consider investigating this? I'm not asking you to believe it...I'm only asking you to check into it for more than sound-bytes. That's all it will take for you to know.
Or remain ignorant at your own peril. I seriously do not want to fight any of you at the end of gun barrel just because you've been deluded by lies of liars, though.
That, sir, is the point of my posting this.
.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest