The most successful local cover bands I know pretty much don't rehearse. They get together once in a great while to learn new songs, but there's no real, regular rehearsals.
Contrast this with all the bands I've been in with weekly or even bi-weekly rehearsals. We'd rehearse and rehearse and rehearse and things actually seemed to get worse. This would go on until at least one musician would leave in disgust. Yes, alright, sometimes it was me, but not always.
So, how often do you rehearse?
Because, there's this drummer buddy of mine, we get together after not having played together for a year or more and we can play a bunch of songs nearly flawlessly. But I've been in bands that rehearsed so often that it was a problem for work, etc. that couldn't play any of their songs that well.
I was in one band that where I recorded rehearsal pretty regularly. After two weeks of rehearsing some of the songs we played them better than what I heard on the recordings of us playing them after a year of rehearsing them.
So, when is it too much?
Are my buddy and I the only ones capable of remembering a song like this? I don't believe it. I won't believe it.
Clearly, you'll get rusty on songs you don't play for a while, but it doesn't seem like it should take a year of weekly rehearsals to whip them into shape. For a lot of the songs I've played in the past it would be three rehearsals, tops. For new songs I generally get them into playable shape within five or six rehearsals.
This seems like it should be common with any competent musician.
Yet I still see bands advertising for musicians where they want regular, weekly rehearsals and have no prospects for gigs.
Why would any competent, self-respecting musician want to subject themselves to this kind of self-flagellation?
CAVEAT: All of the above rant assumes that the bands in question actually do play gigs. If you're playing gigs, you're playing the songs.
Contrast this with all the bands I've been in with weekly or even bi-weekly rehearsals. We'd rehearse and rehearse and rehearse and things actually seemed to get worse. This would go on until at least one musician would leave in disgust. Yes, alright, sometimes it was me, but not always.
So, how often do you rehearse?
Because, there's this drummer buddy of mine, we get together after not having played together for a year or more and we can play a bunch of songs nearly flawlessly. But I've been in bands that rehearsed so often that it was a problem for work, etc. that couldn't play any of their songs that well.
I was in one band that where I recorded rehearsal pretty regularly. After two weeks of rehearsing some of the songs we played them better than what I heard on the recordings of us playing them after a year of rehearsing them.
So, when is it too much?
Are my buddy and I the only ones capable of remembering a song like this? I don't believe it. I won't believe it.
Clearly, you'll get rusty on songs you don't play for a while, but it doesn't seem like it should take a year of weekly rehearsals to whip them into shape. For a lot of the songs I've played in the past it would be three rehearsals, tops. For new songs I generally get them into playable shape within five or six rehearsals.
This seems like it should be common with any competent musician.
Yet I still see bands advertising for musicians where they want regular, weekly rehearsals and have no prospects for gigs.
Why would any competent, self-respecting musician want to subject themselves to this kind of self-flagellation?
CAVEAT: All of the above rant assumes that the bands in question actually do play gigs. If you're playing gigs, you're playing the songs.