If you don't like what I say, you can
http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLqsfwRvYtU
http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLqsfwRvYtU
This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.
Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace
Chief Engineer Scott wrote:"Just as long as your tune doesn't rhyme with every line or something similar"...
I did enjoy reading that though, I thought some others might find it useful.
(shrugs)
When it comes to musical advice, I just take what I can use and dump the rest. I wouldn't follow anything 100%, that's just not my thing.
Now if it was tech advice, I might follow it quite closely since I am not strong technically but it feels as if the creative and the technical are at opposite ends of the spectrum.
Thus the creative is interpretative, where the technical might be more literal.
"Do what works for you".
Chief Engineer Scott wrote:There's a pretty standard rule about rhyme and cadence, but I don't want to give away all the secrets.
Just create a little itch for you to scratch..
Chief Engineer Scott wrote:http://songwriting.songstuff.com/article/cadence_and_the_beginning_of_the_melody/
What do you think>?
GuitarMikeB wrote:I like this quote from Jimmy Webb: "A song is a magical marriage between a lyric (some words) and a melody (some notes). It is not a poem. It is not music. It is in this gray area of synthesis between language, rhythm and sound that some of the most acute of all sensors of human emotion lie."
Trying to analyze and produce a method of songwriting, like this lady is doing, takes all of the realness out of it. I guess if you want to write hits for Beiber and others to perfrom, this might work. She wants you to 'find a hook' first, then 'craft the song' around that. Reminds me of a songwriting exercise at the workshop I went to last year - maybe this works better with songwriting teams.
'Cadence'? It comes naturally when I'm writing lyrics, but sometimes I need to fit a few more words in - or a few less- because I'm writing what needs to be said, not writing to fit a template.
KLUGMO wrote:This is a subject close to my heart. These are just my opinions OK.
As a singer and writer I am very close and connected to my songs.
Especially the singing because it is so out front and connective to even the
musically inept listener. I don't know what percentage of buyers are the
inept customer I refer to but I believe it is substantial. The article I feel does
not speak to the importance of that vocal connection to the general
audience. In general the audience can not appreciate the musical talent
of the players unless they are a musician themselves or one of the players
has a famous background.
Not everyone can understand music but almost all can understand words
especially when communicated emotionally and in tune. One thing I have
a very hard time understanding is how someone who is not a singer can
write a song that is absolutely perfect for someone else.
I guess its a skill I just don't have. I write songs for me to sing.
In NO way do I want to belittle the importance of the instrumentation but
the list of song ingredients did not include the vocal and emotional ingredient
contributed to a great song by a great singer. I think it deserves a place on the list.[/b]
PaperDog wrote:
Jimmy Webb might not know the history of song. Then Again, I dont know Jimmy Webb.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest