#198588 by
Kramerguy
Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:15 pm
Jeff, I think that was MM/Jimmy's point.. owning guns didn't save her, and only enabled the shooter.
Contrary to your beliefs, you would be surprised to find that I'm actually on the fence with gun ownership. I personally want a couple of guns, and used to own 2 rifles and one pistol. I got rid of them for personal reasons, but it was always the other "gun nuts" who worried me.
Upon thinking more into it, I came up with the idea of the armory- a way that I can own guns, yet keep them safe.
When I speak of keeping guns safe, that encompasses more than just locking them in a gun safe and using trigger locks. A smart kid can find a way around both. Just like this guy shot his mom in the head while sleeping, nothing could stop him as much as nothing could stop a child from taking your keys while you are sleeping.
Keeping guns safe means keeping them out of the hands of irresponsible people. This massacre wasn't caused by stolen or illegally obtained guns (well, sort of), but was committed using a legally owned firearm that was owned by someone who was not considered a threat.
Do you suggest that we now do a psych evaluation on everyone in the household of the gun owner? What about visitors? Should all household visitors have to register at the local gun shop for a permit to be in the same house?
I'm making the sarcastic point that more regulation cannot stop a crazy person from obtaining guns and mowing down children. We need to get the guns off the streets. We need stronger laws to get them off the streets. We need a workable and local system to store and distribute guns based on individual needs.
Let's face some facts- anything can be made into a weapon. Among the things mentioned are hammers, shovels, toothbrushes, fertilizer and jet fuel (good luck buying those without going onto an FBI watch list), etc..
The stark difference is that all of those items are built to serve a specific purpose, they are essentially tools. A gun however, is built with only one single purpose- to eject a bullet that will destroy whatever is in it's path, whether it's a paper target, a beer can, or a child.. it's purpose is only destruction. It CAN be used as a tool, for instance, making real hunting (hunting for food) easier; but in most cases it's used for recreation, sport (including the non-real hunting), and killing.
Guns may occasionally save lives, but they also take them.
Thinking more about it.... There's a large pit bull in my neighborhood.. it's owners aren't bad people and the dog isn't mistreated. I still cannot for the life of me understand WHY in the hell they have a pit bull. The dog is dangerous. Many dog breeds have commonalities to them.. cocker spaniels tend to piss all over the place; great danes tend to go mad at middle-old ages, and pit bulls tend to fly off the handle and attack without warning.
...And so do people. I compare the pit bull to the gun and it's owner alike. Arming society is such a bad idea on every level. Get into an argument, and it may be the last argument you ever have. Conflict resolution breaks down to who feels more threatened and draws first. Can't you see the madness?
Armories resolve almost all of my issues, while I can still maintain my right to own and use a gun, and places it's responsibility solely on me, and affords me the restriction of not always having it as a go-to solution when I'm having a bad day, or feel threatened by a pack of skittles or loud music from a car...