#189121 by Slacker G
Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:40 pm
Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:40 pm
Another attack on our freedom of religion? For those who believe in the Living God. We are taught of a coming "One World Religion" in the last days. But first all other religions need to be eradicated. With the Anti Defamation laws of the UN being accepted by some countries, does that pave the way for a one world religion?
In December the Obama Administration pushed a UN resolution that banned criticism of Islam.
http://sheikyermami.com/2012/10/06/iran ... gned-onto/
Another report suggests that all religions be protected.
http://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/ ... 45734.html
a portion of the article
That sounds pretty good doesn’t it? Given that we now know the truth, that the infamous You Tube video had NOTHING to do with the embassy terrorist attacks, do we have another motive for continuing to push the “Movie caused it” ploy. Can you see one?
We would have to ban every religious text worldwide that claims that their god is the only true god. Other than trying to cover his incompetent ass in the embassy debacle, is this his true motive? Do his statements and his actions have more to do with banning the Koran and the Bible than protecting religion? I believe it is more for destroying all present religions making the way clear for a one-world religion. If such a UN law were passed, that is exactly what would happen. The ungodly need not reply
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-850302
http://www.freedomhouse.org/blog/trouble-blasphemy-laws
In December the Obama Administration pushed a UN resolution that banned criticism of Islam.
http://sheikyermami.com/2012/10/06/iran ... gned-onto/
Another report suggests that all religions be protected.
http://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/ ... 45734.html
a portion of the article
“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied. Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims, and Shiite pilgrims,” President Obama said.
He also took a few digs at the inconsistency in the Islamic world’s rage. He noted that the U.S. hasn’t instituted blasphemy laws against anti-Christian speech and that “the future must not belong to those who target Coptic Christians in Egypt.”
These paragraphs sound like a condemnation of all religious intolerance, but the first sentence emphasizes that it is only Islamic forces that should win the future. Anti-Christian sentiments, anti-Semitism and hostility towards Muslim minorities exist, but it is the anti-Islamic forces that we must be most concerned about. President Obama stood against Islamic blasphemy laws but justified the rationale used by Islamists around the world in implementing them.
That sounds pretty good doesn’t it? Given that we now know the truth, that the infamous You Tube video had NOTHING to do with the embassy terrorist attacks, do we have another motive for continuing to push the “Movie caused it” ploy. Can you see one?
We would have to ban every religious text worldwide that claims that their god is the only true god. Other than trying to cover his incompetent ass in the embassy debacle, is this his true motive? Do his statements and his actions have more to do with banning the Koran and the Bible than protecting religion? I believe it is more for destroying all present religions making the way clear for a one-world religion. If such a UN law were passed, that is exactly what would happen. The ungodly need not reply
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-850302
http://www.freedomhouse.org/blog/trouble-blasphemy-laws








