fisherman bob wrote:I actually have a theory, and it's just a theory, that popular genres of music reflect what is going on in society at the time. 1940's WW II- Big band era, everybody pulling together as one, largescale cooperation in the war effort, big bands represent largescale cooperation. 1950's WWII over, mainly peace in the world (except Korea)-early rock and roll and do-op, mainly vocal harmonies with syruppy lyrics, blissful harmony. 1960's Civil rights and Vietnam war raging, folk rock with lyrics protesting civil rights abuses, harder rock and metal are born, rebellion against the war and the establishment. 1975 Vietnam War ends civl rights struggle eases. People who have been down for causes suddenly have no causes. Through the 60's into the early 70's there was little attention on individuals. Disco is born. Look at me on the dance floor, fancy clothes, chains, mirror balls. I exist. LOOK at me. Then into the 80's punk emerges. Like Jimmy said, rock had started becoming too complicated, too ornate. A backlash to rock and disco for that matter. It goes on and on...BUT I don't know what social issues today can inspire a musician to create something new in music. Perhaps we won't see another era of a massively popular "new" genre like in the past.
I would suggest that your theory is absolutely correct.
I would go as far as to say that it is a "law" of human nature not just theory.
It also interweaves with my prior comment and a microcosm of said behaviors can be seen in the seasonal changes in the music of primitive peoples.
The sounds of preparation for harvest are different from the sounds of preparation to sow. As the sound of preparation for love ritual is different from the sound of preparation for war.
I would also contend that you could take our ( modern ) music and subdivide it into these various categories.
But then I see black & white ... I do not recognize "grey areas" in life.