JCP61 wrote:well it really is relative isn't it,
my daughter is a vocal performance major out of BU
now works as music teacher and is paid regularly at various opera companies in NY as well as other classical venues.
her husband is finishing his doctorate in music at Rutgers,
I wouldn't say they are wealthy but they both make their living in music.
my wife's uncle is a has his PHD in music and has never held any other type of job. he is 84 now.
beyond that there is quite a bit of people making a great deal of money in music
but if you are talking about making a living in rock music that is 20 to 30 years past it's prime, well that will probably be pretty tough.
it really depends on what you are willing to do.
bingo. There are many ways to have a full-time rewarding career in music.
But no matter what era of music you look at in world history, the most successful ones were the ones creating new music. Seems like a no-brainer that writing (good) songs and creating fresh music is the key.
All my life I've heard this same crap about it can't be done. I chose not to listen to that. My attitude is "if it's humanly possible, I can do it". It's not easy or everyone would be doing it, and doesn't happen fast. We have to stay sucker-free in a world full of lollipops.
There aren't that many people constantly working to improve themselves. If you are one who does, you will eventually pull away from the crowd.
Anyone can succeed if they take an honest assesment of where they are, then make a plan to get where they want to be and stick with it. I'm just saying that "if" you want to be make money over the long-term as a working musician, you'll need a product to sell...and you'll need a new one every 2 or 3 years.
If you can do that, it doesn't matter what anyone in the industry thinks about your work. You are a success if you are producing.
It is what it is until it isn't





