PaperDog wrote:So is the theory of gravity! Still relevant as is Jung. I am certain Dr. Jung experienced pure evil in his life, if not from his patients of the highest dementia.Etu Malku wrote:Jung: “We are not sinful, shameful human creatures who have to somehow earn Spirituality. We are Spiritual Beings having a human experience."
The shadow is an archetypal form that serves as the focus for material that has been repressed from consciousness its contents include those tendencies desires and memories that are rejected by the individual as incompatible with the persona and contrary to social standards and ideals.
The shadow contains all the negative tendencies the individual wishes to deny, including our animal instincts, as well as undeveloped positive and negative qualities.
Images of evil, the devil and the concept of original sin are all aspects of the shadow archetype.
Jung is a very outdated theorist. He was a side-man to Freud (Who is also outdated) . He has even less credence for me than any spiritual system of faith that I might hold.
I don't think Jung ever experienced real evil. In fact , I have to believe he was quite sheltered and scarcely experienced any real life. He was strictly 'academic' and untried . I am certain that if he had ever witnessed real evil, (I'm talking serious atrocity, so 'inhumane and perverse', that the only immediate reaction was to vomit , followed by months of unsettling nightmares, self-questioning), his entire body of work on shadows , Archetypes and persona would have taken a different direction.
I suggest you read about Dr. Jung, you are completely wrong in your assumption.




