General Music Chat

I wish someone would call out this liar for being the terrorist that he is. He frightens the old, the infirm, and the poor, service families, widows, and the likes by making up blatant lies (Of course that is all he has ever done) to terrorize the most vulnerable of Americans. He tells the defenseless that they may not get their government checks unless his kind of a deal is made by the second of the month. He makes them feel that might not be able to pay their rent, utilities, or go to the store to get food to eat. He tries to force his "targets" to call in to those that represent them and tell them that they should give him what he wants. And he constantly bullies private enterprise to do things his way or he'll make it hard for them.

Doesn't this complete nincompoop know that the checks are already in the local post offices three or four days before the delivery date? That means that they have been in your local post office on or before the first of the month, on a shelf waiting to be delivered. Hasn't anyone noticed that the envelope has "Deliver by the third of the month" printed on it? Hmm, lets see, the deadline is the second, the checks are to be delivered on the third…. Unless the government "goes bankrupt". It's a good thing that the propaganda machine never lets facts get in the way of a good deception.

Terrorist always chooses the easy target with the intent of terrorizing as many as they can to get their way. How many did our terrorist in chief threaten? Some terrorists get their way with threats of utilizing bombs. Some use bombs and threaten more if their demands aren't met. Some use death threats. Some use blackmail... Oh that's right... he has used blackmail numerous times. Our terrorist in chief used his propaganda machine, the news media, to terrorize the powerless and the defenseless. He targeted the weakest of all in our country, the easy target that only a true coward would chose to attack.

So which is worse, to threaten to bomb a mall to force people to stay away and cause the financial hardship of those owning the mall. Or to threaten to withhold life support from the elderly, the infirm, the poor, the widows and children, and service men? I only hope this *&^#$^& goes down in history as the cowardly low life that he truly is.

So isn't a terrorist one who terrifies someone? I couldn't even begin to count all the elderly that were scared half to death that their source if income would be cut off. Am I missing something here? I have a feeling this post won't beon here long. But how do you see it?

I see this red diaper baby acting out his Marxist fantasies. One reason we are in this pickle is that Marxists use the same words decent people do but they mean something different.

I'm glad that person was elected. I believe that as a republic we are probably finished - all over but the dying. But having that thing in DC has been good - all the cards are on the table. That gives people who love freedom at least a chance.

I heard somebody say yesterday 'that bunch should be arrested and tried for treason." Sure...by whom? "that bunch" owns all those paramilitary militias like ATF, SWAT,Acorn, Unions etc... We're in big trouble.

It's 1860 again and God help us all. Shermans bandits will look like angels compared this current crop of scoundrels.

Talbot

The problem isn't Obama. America elected him. America knew what they were getting. The problem is we need a viable third party. Neither the dems or repubs have the answers we need. Until we have a new political atmosphere the incompetence will continue unabated.

I have the answer.

I wish someone would call out this liar for being the terrorist that he is. He frightens the old, the infirm, and the poor, service families, widows, and the likes by making up blatant lies (Of course that is all he has ever done) to terrorize the most vulnerable of Americans. He tells the defenseless that they may not get their government checks unless his kind of a deal is made by the second of the month. He makes them feel that might not be able to pay their rent, utilities, or go to the store to get food to eat. He tries to force his "targets" to call in to those that represent them and tell them that they should give him what he wants. And he constantly bullies private enterprise to do things his way or he'll make it hard for them.

Doesn't this complete nincompoop know that the checks are already in the local post offices three or four days before the delivery date? That means that they have been in your local post office on or before the first of the month, on a shelf waiting to be delivered. Hasn't anyone noticed that the envelope has "Deliver by the third of the month" printed on it? Hmm, lets see, the deadline is the second, the checks are to be delivered on the third…. Unless the government "goes bankrupt". It's a good thing that the propaganda machine never lets facts get in the way of a good deception.

Terrorist always chooses the easy target with the intent of terrorizing as many as they can to get their way. How many did our terrorist in chief threaten? Some terrorists get their way with threats of utilizing bombs. Some use bombs and threaten more if their demands aren't met. Some use death threats. Some use blackmail... Oh that's right... he has used blackmail numerous times. Our terrorist in chief used his propaganda machine, the news media, to terrorize the powerless and the defenseless. He targeted the weakest of all in our country, the easy target that only a true coward would chose to attack.

So which is worse, to threaten to bomb a mall to force people to stay away and cause the financial hardship of those owning the mall. Or to threaten to withhold life support from the elderly, the infirm, the poor, the widows and children, and service men? I only hope this *&^#$^& goes down in history as the cowardly low life that he truly is.

So isn't a terrorist one who terrifies someone? I couldn't even begin to count all the elderly that were scared half to death that their source if income would be cut off. Am I missing something here? I have a feeling this post won't beon here long. But how do you see it?

Slacker G,
I would not call Obama a terrorist.. But I would call him a Horrorist (one who perpetuates horror). A terrorist plots his evil scheme and makes himself to look like the monster. But a horrorist "is" the monster...Doesn't mean to be, doesn't try to be.. Nevertheless, Its horrific, how the country is falling apart under Obama's reign... All Obama wants is to have a few beers with you and me. He's like a child, behind the wheel of a John Deer tractor, and he's trying to cross the Delaware river in it. Its horrific how he overlooks the needs of senior citizens, using the excuse that the country is in debt. He's like a teenager, trying to order a Pheasant -Under-Glass pizza, thinking that somehow, he has taste in pizza, and that taste in Pizza is cooler than serving ripple in a can. Its horrifying , how he's sending our children the ultimate: "Time-Warner Cable User Fees" bill. Everything about this guy is bad news.. But there is a very tacit and identifiable reason why this country got so f**k up... Simply put... Lawyers f**k this country up. Obama was a Lawyer before he was a president. Most, if not all of Congress is made up of lawyers. So, here's what I'm thinking... In High-schools, we need to teach our children that growing up to become a lawyer is even filthier than being a pole dancer. Short of beating the crap out of Individuals who aspire to be lawyers... We need to identify and stop them early on. Clearly, penny loafers and knit slacks, white shirts with ties (in the 9th grade public school system debate-team) is a dead give away and such youngsters must be impaled and displayed for all to see. LOL Seriously though,
Only a year and a half of this nonsense left and then a new guy will step up... (BTW I predicted that Trump was gonna flake...and I was right.)

Pole dancing is honest work ... there is no pretense ... no lie about the intent.

Just sayin ...

I have the answer.

. (I'm making an assumption): Unfortuneately your answer does not take into account the myriad of religious and political viewpoints of our great melting pot. The answer you have will become evident in a different dimension.

In High-schools, we need to teach our children that growing up to become a lawyer is even filthier than being a pole dancer.

to make such a comparison between them and lawyers is an insult to whores

Bob you are SO right except I would say there is room for more than just 3.[/b]

Bob you are SO right except I would say there is room for more than just 3.[/b]

. Of course there's more room for political parties. We've already got more poliical parties. The problem is that the other parties have no chance to win major political offices. Our system is financially rigged. How many senators, congressmen, governors etc. are members of a different political party? None I can think of. It's entirely about money. Right now the major headlines are concerning which candidates have the most money...

Bob you are SO right except I would say there is room for more than just 3.[/b]

. Of course there's more room for political parties. We've already got more poliical parties. The problem is that the other parties have no chance to win major political offices. Our system is financially rigged. How many senators, congressmen, governors etc. are members of a different political party? None I can think of. It's entirely about money. Right now the major headlines are concerning which candidates have the most money...

Exactly! and the authors of the Constitution had it in mind that Joe Schmo From the farm in Idaho should have just as much opportunity to stand watch as the next guy. The current system is a "good 'ol boys club' of wealthy pansies who realize the implication of power behind the office.

There is no 'party" today... There are just labels to distract and divide public consensus and to keep us off balance.

If I were king for a day, I would conduct a radical retrenchment of the house and senate. Pretty much fire everybody. I would then recruit new members based on the following criteria:
1) Have you served in the military?
2) Will you say the Pledge of Allegiance?
3) If Grant spends 100 dollars on an import that Grant hired workers overseas to make for 5 dollars, should Grant get a tax break?
4) What is the half-life of a 1 megaton Nuclear bomb, detonated 100 years ago?
5) And Finally: Are you willing to: hold your office for 28k a year salary, Pay 20% copay on your medical coverage, contribute 20% un matched funds into your own IRA, surrender (sell off) any existing short term stock in your portfolio, BEFORE you take office?

Then I would shut the doors of the US to the world for 5 years (Five, because it takes that long IMO for the books to realize a full business cycle) . Whereby, I would tell Europe, Asia and the Middle East to politely f**k - off until my Domestic production got back on its feet. Then I'd open the door for new business.. (Of course I would pay back loans, or renegotiate under new biz...such that unlike the current congress persons, I WILL NOT sell out my country)

No MORE LOANS, DO Roll back to the Healthcare progs that actually did work until Obama came along (Fraud Waste & Abuse not withstanding). Finally... Give Seniors the long and overdue COLA raises.

Dog,


"Slacker G,
I would not call Obama a terrorist.. But I would call him a Horrorist (one who perpetuates horror). A terrorist plots his evil scheme and makes himself to look like the monster. But a horrorist "is" the monster...Doesn't mean to be, doesn't try to be.."

It makes little difference as to what others may or may not call him, his actions speak boldly of both him and his character. He is as much a terrorist to those who are dependent as a terrorist bomber is to those who go to public places in the East. I see absolutely no difference. By the way, I couldn't find horrorist in the dictionary. Changing the definition of words to lessen its impact or to suit ones purpose is the propaganda tool the radical left uses daily. ( I am in no way implying you are of the radical left.) He uses bullying and terrorism to attain his goals. And bullies and the likes have been charged with making terroristic threats in the courts. Definition #2

[ter-er-ist] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism.
2.
a person who terrorizes or frightens others.
3.
(formerly) a member of a political group in russia aiming at the demoralization of the government by terror.

Noun 1. terrorist - a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for terrorist activities. (Do they mean like Czars?)

To threaten to keep people from being able to purchase food, pay their rent, pay their bills, by means of stopping their finances is s terrifying to little old ladies, the handicapped, and those dependent on those finances is as much a terroristic threat as a bomb is to those who fear a suicide bomber coming to a mall or a movie. I have heard the dependent and the elderly call into talk radio, and I assure you, they are terrified of his threats. To suggest a threat is no less that proclaiming a threat. No? Then call your congressman and tell him that if something that you want them to do isn't done, you won't be held responsible for the consequences.

I wonder how long it would take S.W.A.T. to get to your door.

And I do not see how this topic has anything to do with political parties. No wonder people can't see this for what it is... they can't even stay on task.
I presume that this is the very reason we are in the predicament we are in today.

Dog,


"Slacker G,
I would not call Obama a terrorist.. But I would call him a Horrorist (one who perpetuates horror). A terrorist plots his evil scheme and makes himself to look like the monster. But a horrorist "is" the monster...Doesn't mean to be, doesn't try to be.."

It makes little difference as to what others may or may not call him, his actions speak boldly of both him and his character. He is as much a terrorist to those who are dependent as a terrorist bomber is to those who go to public places in the East. I see absolutely no difference. By the way, I couldn't find horrorist in the dictionary. Changing the definition of words to lessen its impact or to suit ones purpose is the propaganda tool the radical left uses daily. ( I am in no way implying you are of the radical left.) He uses bullying and terrorism to attain his goals. And bullies and the likes have been charged with making terroristic threats in the courts. Definition #2

[ter-er-ist] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism.
2.
a person who terrorizes or frightens others.
3.
(formerly) a member of a political group in russia aiming at the demoralization of the government by terror.

Noun 1. terrorist - a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for terrorist activities. (Do they mean like Czars?)

To threaten to keep people from being able to purchase food, pay their rent, pay their bills, by means of stopping their finances is s terrifying to little old ladies, the handicapped, and those dependent on those finances is as much a terroristic threat as a bomb is to those who fear a suicide bomber coming to a mall or a movie. I have heard the dependent and the elderly call into talk radio, and I assure you, they are terrified of his threats. To suggest a threat is no less that proclaiming a threat. No? Then call your congressman and tell him that if something that you want them to do isn't done, you won't be held responsible for the consequences.

I wonder how long it would take S.W.A.T. to get to your door.

And I do not see how this topic has anything to do with political parties. No wonder people can't see this for what it is... they can't even stay on task.
I presume that this is the very reason we are in the predicament we are in today.

By the definition you provided, Wilson fits the description better... Unlike Wilson, Obama is not "trying" to terrorize" on purpose. A terrorist is mean spirited and deliberately sets out to cause hate and discontent. In fact, historically, it's deliberately designed to usurp governments and compromise the integrity of the citizenry... Usually coincides with a coup-de-tant . Obama does not intend to overthrow the gov. But he's a calamity Jane... He's a Jimmy carter with awkwardness, He actually believes that his Ideas are a helpful solution 'for' America. At the very best, he's guilty of insensitivity to the plights of Americans in Middle class or below.
I've been saying for the last 3 years... 'Americans are about to get medevel on their govt.' Congress already knows this..Just look at the security they have beefed up around DC. I was just there last year and its ridiculous how paranoid folks are getting. They know a storm is coming form the inside. Just watch the news and you'll see more violence emerging...

Well ... I have that answer too.

Constitutional government & hang any elected official found in violation of the constitution or engaging in corruption.

Obama as president has not impressed me with the exception of his latest move to lower the budget by increasing taxes on the very wealthy. Republicans say that will stunt employment growth. Hewwey! Oil companies pay less on each dollar earned than the dollars we get as hourly employees. Don't get your feathers ruffled Republicans, I am an independent voter so that I can vote on each issue or candidate as I feel is the best for my state/country. I don't understand voting across the board one way or the other. Independent candidates per say, have not been that impressive, and they don't get campaign contributions as dems or reps. I just don't think the multi-billion dollar corp.s should shrug their financial responsibility off on the blue collars. Either way, the feuding in Washington is only a stall tactic, with the winner of the debate as most likely to succeed in the next presidential election, with little time for cause and effect to raise it's head. No matter the president, we have to pray he/she get the knowledge and stature we need to (as a nation), keep our credibility and not go bankrupt.