rushing wrote:we are to be the example of jesus as best we can,if we dont whats the point ,we are no better then those who dont believe,am sorry if you claim to be a God loving jesus following born again christian then walk the talk for there is no gray you are or you are not there is no fence and Gods words means what it says,there is no well this is what it really means ,if you are a christian then be one,live it eat it,walk it,God says you will know who they serve by how they live,LOOK IT UP! all you who clam to be christian and live it not chew on this,REV 3-v15 16 I KNOW YOUR WORKS THAT YOU ARE NEITHER COLD NOR HOT,I WISH YOU WERE COLD OR HOT,SO THEN BECAUSE YOU ARE LUKEWARM I WILL VOMIT YOU OUT OF MY MOUTH. Jesus would rather you not believe in Him then be wishy washy. So go ahead and think its ok to sing and speak the way you like, where you spend eternity is up to you,and eternity is a long time(.This topic is not for non believing so please dont answer)
I have read this statement above carefully and would like to share an analogy. Instead of a song, lets use the model of extemporaneous prose. ...For those that do not know what that means, briefly, it's any essay and/or speech shot from the hip (as opposed to a well planned / formal essay/speech).
Using Etu's postulation of "intent" behind words, Lets examine the intent behind the words of Rushing's extemporaneous prose (above).
On close examination, an argument about the veracity, and sincerity of faith is being made. Veracity, i.e. by using the argument of "Lukewarm" to measure the perceived disappointment that Christ feels, toward the "Washy-Washy" who sit on the "Fence". The author here has taken the liberty to speak 'for' Jesus by claiming a specific preference, belonging to Jesus. However, I would submit that the author's (Rushing's) inference of Jesus's sentiment, might be misleading.
Point 1) I have it on very solid authority, that in no way, under any circumstances , does Jesus ever prefer you NOT to believe, given the option to believe. The assumption that he would rather have you NOT believe than to sit on the fence, is patently wrong, and is strictly the opinion of Rushing.
Point 2) The inference of "eternity" bears no direct relevance to (Point 1)
Given just these two points (And I could have gone on) , We can conclude that the "intent of The Words" in Rushing's prose, may have served more as a veiled threat, than a as a useful gospel of Good news.
If that be the case, then, Mr Rushing, I hope you understand that its a very dangerous proposition on your part to use the word Of God as a weapon against the other Children of God. In fact, doing so,
1) Creates More resistance and resentment toward the Plan of God and that of Christs love
2) Smacks as a work of the devil. (If I were God, and you represented me this way, I might consider working up a lightening bolt. (SO, Look for a storm in your area soon) )
Etu, I have made an attempt to defend your case here, as I realize, you and many other face a constant barrage of judgments from unqualified spiriters in the name of Christ...
But you are not off the hook...You hailed Satan...
Instead, try hailing a Cab... and ask the driver what he thinks about lukewarm coffee