General Music Chat

This is GREAT, what other religion on earth can fight amongst itself?
Hail Satan!

I Met the Devil once.. Face to Face.

Oh yeah? What did he look like? (I'll know if you're lying O_o)

Christine's Tune (Devil in Disguise)" - The Flying Burrito Brothers
"The Devil You Know" - Todd Snider
"Devil Town" - Daniel Johnston
"Friend of the Devil" - The Grateful Dead
Devil's Dance - Metallica
Shout At The Devil - Motley Crue
Dancing With The Devil - Breaking Benjamin
Devil's Radio - George Harrison
Devil Or Angel - Bobby Vee
Devil Woman - Cliff Richard
Devil In Disguise - Elvis
Devil With A Blue Dress - Mitch Ryder And The Detroit Wheels
Sympathy For The Devil - The Rolling Stones
Little Devil - Neil Sedaka
The Devil In Her Heart - The Beatles
"The Devil Went Down To Georgia" - The Charlie Daniels Band
"Running With The Devil" - Van Halen
B52's - The Devils in My Car
Devil Woman - Ringo Star
Devil Behind That Bush - The Cramps
Devil's Own - Five Finger Death Punch
Eyes Of The Devil - Seether
Lil Devil- The Cult
The Devil In Me, Kate Voegele
Race with the Devil by Gun
Devil's Child - Judas Priest

I like all of these song's.....hummmm. I guess I'm just a bad boy.

like most who have posted on this am sorry to say you missed the mark,i wish you all would read the topic post and then give your thoughts insted of reading the last one

rushing I thought I did, Im not reading back thru but I just feel its the intent of the person recording or singing the song, if its inspired or glorifying God then its that, if it glorifys anything else then its not

Also:

Race With Devil On Spanish Highway - Al Di Meola
Devil Inside - INXS

Also:

Race With Devil On Spanish Highway - Al Di Meola
Devil Inside - INXS

Jimmy you little Devil

Don't forget:

The Devil's Trill - Giuseppe Tartini
Me and the Devil Blues - Robert Johnson

This is GREAT, what other religion on earth can fight amongst itself?
Hail Satan!

I Met the Devil once.. Face to Face.

Oh yeah? What did he look like? (I'll know if you're lying O_o)

Actually , The devil looked exactly Like me... (I Looked for the enemy , and found it was me)

Well, frogs, as with any organic matter is always in a state of evolution, it may appear to us that they are the same as last years frog, but in fact they have genetically altered in some way, shape or form in order to survive in a dynamically changing environment.

Keep in mind that evolution is typically described by theorists as points of significant mutation. Last year's frog is more in a state of variation than evolution. (Remember when I mentioned "Margins Of Tolerance".) It indeed varied genetically last year from this year, but, may still not pose any profound evolution. Alterations/mutations which which best suit and support the Frog's survival in a changed environment, succeed only if the frog can propagate the mutation. Patterns can contain numerous details that appear to change, but may not necessarily effect the over all expression of the given structure. (Hence, Last years frog looks like this years frog...even as the details in the genes have changed.

I have GOT to stop reading so many cereal boxes...

PD, are you familiar with the idea of Punctuated Equilibrium? Briefly, this theory states that species often stay the same (or in equilibrium) for millions of years, punctuated by rapid evolution into new forms. The source of the change is sometimes positive mutations in the genome, but more often simple recombination (sex). This is probably why life forms with sexes are more successful than other forms that do not use sexual recombination for reproduction.

PD, are you familiar with the idea of Punctuated Equilibrium? Briefly, this theory states that species often stay the same (or in equilibrium) for millions of years, punctuated by rapid evolution into new forms. The source of the change is sometimes positive mutations in the genome, but more often simple recombination (sex). This is probably why life forms with sexes are more successful than other forms that do not use sexual recombination for reproduction.

I have heard of it...didn't really realize the relevance till you pointed it out... It makes perfect sense.
Speciation necessarily requires reproductive access in order to carry through the line. (Hence the reproductive success of sexes to maintain species)

Here's an interesting thought... Cockroaches, mate and produce an Egg sac. Now here's a situation where access to reproduction is a different branch, than successful development /incubation of the offspring. The egg sac gets placed anywhere and is left behind. Thus The environments are entirely random. Roaches haven't changed for a million years ( I would Guess) . I wonder if there is any correlation between Punctuated equilibrium, and catastrophic environmental changes... The key is adaptability...Roaches proliferate in numbers, along with large numbers of sexual reproductive opportunities (Mating cycles), along with large numbers of environmental hosting opportunities. The permutations and combinations for successful generation of offspring are probably astronomical. They actually parallel human successes. (Except we can't have 25+ babies at a time)
If Punctuated equilibrium holds true, then we should expect a drastic change in environment, such that it interferes with the roaches reproductive cycles and frame work.

"Buy Kafka for your Kindle, now at participating Book stores"

PapaerDog - did you write this? This is awesome. I perceive that thou art a poet!

I Met the Devil once.. Face to Face. This I have Learned:

1) He'll laugh more at you than he ever will at me. (Because I still have something that he wants...)

3) He promised me there is no Hell-Fire and Brimstone. No pain as we know it. But He assured me that a real Hell exists. (Think of existence in disarray, perversity within an abandoned universe, and a complete absence of hope. )

4) He skipped number 2 because he proudly boasts chaos.

5) He also proved to me that he knows my Christian Bible even better than I do.

I remember walking away from that interlude, as I witnessed a beating in a bar.

The vision and knowledge was the biggest blessing I ever received.
As such, rationalize religion all you want. Justify / counter it all you can. Thrive well and get your licks in, before it all rots away.

As for me, I've got a better place to be , just around the corner

Mine own words, indeed they be,
though they couldn't draft the inkliest of a little fee...
Nor move the press, nor make the market or the Glee,
But surely they have brought this bit of attention on toward me...

Look lets stay on the main topic shall we? Some say heavy rock is sinful,and its not, no music is sinful for if there is no words its just sound and sound does not make or destroy,we are not to only praise God acapella bible reference Psalm 150, we can have all kinds of instruments,sound dose not create nor destroy,bible reference genesis 3-31 AND God SAID and it was He spoke words,look the point is this and this only,God gives us the ok for music but who or what are you giving glory to by the WORDS you sing

We were on topic.. You can't conclude anything about your original question until you (Us) unpack your predicate first. What you mean by demonic does not necessarily apply as a definition for others and so on

a christian posted that heavy rock music was of the devil,well there was way to many post on that to give a good thought,so i posted that its not the music but the lyrics that made it for a christian good or bad,now for a christian we are to give God the glory not satan,sex drugs and the list can go on,this post was for the one who clams to follow jesus, and if one dose do we sing about things that are neg or pos,my point was it not the music but the words a song without words is just sound.

a christian posted that heavy rock music was of the devil,well there was way to many post on that to give a good thought,so i posted that its not the music but the lyrics that made it for a christian good or bad,now for a christian we are to give God the glory not satan,sex drugs and the list can go on,this post was for the one who clams to follow jesus, and if one dose do we sing about things that are neg or pos,my point was it not the music but the words a song without words is just sound.

Yet Words are subjective. What is Good or Evil is subjective.

I would beg to differ in that it isn't the Words either, it is the 'Intent' behind the composition, whether instrumental or a song with lyrics that make it Good or Evil.