I'll also point out the science of Cymatics where it is shown that Frequencies indeed do Create geometric patterns and thus meaning that the origin of our Universe (big bang) has these Principles in charge of Creating the material universe not some Intelligent Designer (aka god).
Everything organic in our universe is known to be a result of a mathematical Principle called the Golden Mean, Phi, and /or the Fibonacci Sequence.
The fabrication of god is an attempt at consoling the mind in all these matters and of course deeper more spiritual matters as well.
I Disagree... Nothing organic in this universe is known to be the result of anything mathematical, principle or otherwise. However, I will agree that everything organic can be expressed and explained mathematically.. (Big Difference) As for Fibonacci, the trouble with that theory is that each pattern is not repeatable...Infinite combinations (i.e no two snowflakes are alike . Please show me how the class and species of a frog, remains constant in design, under the premise of your suggested sequence. Finally, how do you know whether or not Frequencies are the 'intelligent design' that casts an outcome called the material universe. (String Theory holds that the fabric of our universe is defined through vibration; All known frequencies are reliable and indisputable, therefore, all anomalies in the universe can be explained and repeated. If this is true, then random design, cannot exist. And If that is true, then the only remaining explanation is that the design of the universe is deliberate, suggesting intelligent, ordered design.) And as a bonus, what you call odds and probability, I might describe as 'margins of tolerance' for far reaching, expected outcomes.
The fabrication of
god/ or
Devil is an attempt at consoling the mind in all these matters and of course deeper more spiritual matters as well.[/quote]
Again, Sounds good until you actually read the label. You are making some assumptions: that a mind with conviction of faith, somehow qualifies for and needs consoling.
Faith requires no evidence, therefore no consoling is necessary.
If you need evidence, it means you have doubt. If you have doubt, it means you are likely to challenge a prevailing convention.
Thus, Can you dispute the logic of Descartes meditation about existence? (Albeit it its a dated philosophy). He does not console his own mind. He actually challenges his own conviction and is able to reconcile a fact out of it.