This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#148086 by gbheil
Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:52 am
Yes ... quite so.

Thank you for asking.

Luke 8:4-15
When a great multitude came together, and people from every city were coming to him, he spoke by a parable.

"The farmer went out to sow his seed. As he sowed, ome fell along the road, and it was trampled under foot, and the birds of the sky devoured it.

Other seed fell on the rock, and as soon as it grew, it withered away,
because it had no moisture.

Other fell amid the thorns, and the thorns grew with it, and choked it.

Other fell into the good ground, and grew, and brought forth fruit one hundred times."


As he said these things, he called out, "He who has ears to hear, let him hear!"
Then his disciples asked him, "What does this parable mean?"
He said, "To you it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of God, but to the rest in parables; that ‘seeing they may not see, and hearing they may not understand.’
Now the parable is this: The seed is the word of God.


Those along the road are those who hear, then the devil comes,
and takes away the word from their heart, that they may not believe and be saved.

Those on the rock are they who, when they hear, receive the word with joy but these have no root, who believe for a while, then fall away in time of temptation.

That which fell among the thorns, these are those who have heard, and as they go on their way they are choked with cares, riches, and pleasures of life, and bring no fruit to maturity.

That in the good ground, these are such as in an honest and good heart,
having heard the word, hold it tightly, and bring forth fruit with patience.

#148087 by Crunchysoundbite
Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:03 am
Crunchysoundbite wrote:Judeo- Christian Bible- Then the New Testament. Which is where I read Proverbs 1:7 that says "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge. Stubborn fools despise wisdom and discipline.
Rock is not Satan. For anyone to say I don't like your tunes/ it's Satanisti, well, it may provoke that to those that may look for a way to prevent you to enjoy life, sounds, display to the heavenly father,Yada. yada- Is Rock of Satan? Is enjoying life and nature ' Of Satan"? How could this be an argument? Don't enjoy your dinner, don't enjoy old Time religion , ( someone out there mmight consider Any music to be of Satan and that as Christians we should cower and bow so that there is no one that could say that we are people of Jesus. How did this thread get to solar plexis,? Just continue to think that there could possibly be any satan in music of any type. The argument is over. there is no point except it is satan who doesn't want Christians to have rock. He doesn't want us in mainstream anything. Believe it and they will tell you it is unChristian like to answer the phone or drive a car, or kiss your mothers lips.

#148092 by Etu Malku
Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:11 am
sanshouheil wrote:Yes ... quite so.

Thank you for asking.

Luke 8:4-15
When a great multitude came together, and people from every city were coming to him, he spoke by a parable.

"The farmer went out to sow his seed. As he sowed, ome fell along the road, and it was trampled under foot, and the birds of the sky devoured it.

Other seed fell on the rock, and as soon as it grew, it withered away,
because it had no moisture.

Other fell amid the thorns, and the thorns grew with it, and choked it.

Other fell into the good ground, and grew, and brought forth fruit one hundred times."


As he said these things, he called out, "He who has ears to hear, let him hear!"
Then his disciples asked him, "What does this parable mean?"
He said, "To you it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of God, but to the rest in parables; that ‘seeing they may not see, and hearing they may not understand.’
Now the parable is this: The seed is the word of God.


Those along the road are those who hear, then the devil comes,
and takes away the word from their heart, that they may not believe and be saved.

Those on the rock are they who, when they hear, receive the word with joy but these have no root, who believe for a while, then fall away in time of temptation.

That which fell among the thorns, these are those who have heard, and as they go on their way they are choked with cares, riches, and pleasures of life, and bring no fruit to maturity.

That in the good ground, these are such as in an honest and good heart,
having heard the word, hold it tightly, and bring forth fruit with patience.
How pathetic . . . I've been biting my tongue and trying to be nice here . . . oh well.

Who in their right mind follows this evil, mass murdering god?
I'm well read in the Abrahamic (as well as other bibles) Are you?

God orders the killing of innocent people even after the Ten Commandments said "Thou shall not kill".

Your God kills 70,000 innocent people because David ordered a census of the people (1 Chronicles 21).

God also orders the destruction of 60 cities so that the Israelites can live there. He orders the killing of all the men, women, and children of each city, and the looting of all of value (Deuteronomy 3).

He orders another attack and the killing of "all the living creatures of the city: men and women, young, and old, as well as oxen sheep, and asses" (Joshua 6).

Kings 10:18-27, God orders the murder of all the worshipers of a different god in their very own church! In total God kills 371,186 people directly and orders another 1,862,265 people murdered.

The God of the Bible also allows slavery, including selling your own daughter as a sex slave (Exodus 21:1-11), child abuse (Judges 11:29-40 and Isaiah 13:16), and bashing babies against rocks (Hosea 13:16 & Psalms 137:9).

#148097 by Sir Jamsalot
Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:41 am
Etu Malku wrote:How pathetic . . . I've been biting my tongue and trying to be nice here . . . oh well.


so much for civility. :roll:

#148099 by PaperDog
Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:07 am
Etu Malku wrote:
sanshouheil wrote:Not to sound bloody obvious but.

There is only one way.

JESUS!


People can disagree all they want.

They will only be wrong to their own damnation ... not mine.

I'm just sowing seed ... I am not responsible for the harvest.
Can you in some way give evidence to this? Or at the very least try to explain yourself.


Etu,
I suppose, I could find a million valid things to bring forth , all of which I could use to dissuade myself and others from allowing any belief in this God. (Show me an auditor of any vocation, and I guarantee to show you failure...along with hopelessness in that vocation. )

I have read quite a few parts of the bible, parts of Koran <sp> , Parts of Talmud, Parts of "How to steal this book" by Abbie Hoffman... Here is the thing... I haven't been able to find a "better God" than even the one you described. Its clear that the God of Abraham is a bad-ass, to be sure.
Now I could fall for the tenets of Islam, And I would then quickly discover that Mohammed's Allah would like you to die for him. (And 72 Virginians doesn't seem like a very good reward... ) Where as Christ's Father would like his son to die for you.

I could bow to and rub the belly of the Buddha... And mind you I do indeed hold a high reverence for the tenets of Zen. I actually believe they got the engineering of God's universe dead nuts on... Christian Dogma with Zen engineering... The new Priest-hood? (Later for another discussion)

Here's the bottom line... As a gambler, I personally opt for the belief that yields the most leverage. Me personally, I'd rather believe in Christ , die and find out I was wrong, than Not believe in Christ , die and find out I was wrong. It's a hedge bet.

Why Christ? Because, for the life of me, I can't find a better author for life. (No one has been able to show me a better one.)

I have met a lot of younger people, who dismiss Christianity, because they confuse certain behavior / dogma and practices for the essence of Christianity. But, They are simply wrong and misinformed. For example, If you get thumped with a bible by some holy roller, I can assure you that guy is no more a christian that Hitler was. He ain't "gettin it". Christ is NOT about Hell-fire and Brimstone. Anybody that tells you it is, or anybody that goes on about "consequences" against you, is not spreading the good news about how uncomplicated life in Christ really is (Its not that demanding) . Christianity really gets a bad rap because of dudes like that... Christ would never condone War and death, so if you hear some christian actually espouse War & death, he ain't no Christian. In fact, If I were GOD, I'd be seriously pissed at the assholes who try to "represent' me with such malicious and inequitable spirit and behavior.

Not trying to convert here,,,just pointing out , if you have doubts, that's fine... But can you keep an open mind, enough to realize that "God " or "Christ" doesn't have to be a dirty word? Nor does a belief in either warrant the judgement of 'pathetic' .

Steppin off now... :P

#148112 by gbheil
Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:03 pm
Those along the road are those who hear, then the devil comes,
and takes away the word from their heart, that they may not believe and be saved.

#148114 by neanderpaul
Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:16 pm
celticpiping wrote:a difference of opinion on say, tongues as a sign of the indwelling of the holy spirit is one thing,


I Cor 13:8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

celticpiping wrote: or maybe infant baptism

There are zero examples of infant baptisms in the new testament. Babies can't sin. In fact

Matt 18:3 "And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

And since baptism is for the remission of sins....
Acts 2:38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

...Then infant Baptism is another idea of man and should be a another non-issue.

celticpiping wrote:....but a "command" that worship be voice only.
That goes from slight difference to departure from orthodoxy in my small opinion.

That command can literally be read. And can literally be obeyed. Just sing praise. That and that only is what is commanded in the new testament. Ephesians 5:19 , Colossians 3:16 That is what I try to do with all matters of worship. Adding anything else is just that. Adding to the prescribed method of worship. To add to God's plan shows a lack of respect for the authority of scripture and the perfection of Christ's Church.

We can see how God feels about "little" changes to his prescribed worship in the story of Nadab and Abihu. Leviticus 10:1-2 1And Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, took either of them his censer, and put fire therein, and put incense thereon, and offered strange fire before the LORD, which he commanded them not. 2And there went out fire from the LORD, and devoured them, and they died before the LORD.


celticpiping wrote: btw, how can it be that :
1) OT musical instrument worship is received/encouraged by God

There are instances where OT use of instruments is negative.
Amos 6:1Woe to them........
6:5 That chant to the sound of the viol, and invent to themselves instruments of musick, like David;


celticpiping wrote: btw, how can it be that :
2) NT worship is vox only

I don't see how this is even a question. It can be that NT worship is vox only because that is literally all you can find in the NT.

celticpiping wrote: btw, how can it be that :
3) Heavenly worship will clearly be via musical instruments/voice

It can be that way in heaven for the same reasons it can be any way God chooses it to be. The operative phrase is God chooses. In heaven there will be no imperfect flesh. There will also be no imperfect man made steel, brass, and wooden instruments. There will be God's instruments and I'm banking that they will be perfect. God chose to tell us to worship him in song with our voices. That is what I will do.

celticpiping wrote: so...why the haitus in between
sense=0

It is not not my place to question God's will. It is my place to obey, to worship God as he commands.

celticpiping wrote: oh, also I spose I could begin arguing about our very lives being an act of worship, poured out as a result of being bought at a price: and as such, if you're singing stuff that isn't, you're choosing to use that voice for something other than worship: which seems a double standard or sorts.


I don't follow that. There are big parts of our lives that are not worship. Work for instance which we are commanded to do. And again I submit the sports example or the entertainment example. We are clearly commanded to behave as Christians all the time but we are not worshiping all the time.

celticpiping wrote: And not to mention the biblical teaching that "how can a fountain issue forth both good and bad water"

Don't really follow the example here. Good water would be the worship we offer. And living a Christian life in our work and leisure activities would still be good water.

celticpiping wrote: Sorry dude, but one could fire a veritable theological howitzer through that teaching.
It just doesn't make logical sense at all to me.

I believe that using clear biblical examples (which I require to have a Christian belief) effectively disarmed your howitzer. :) I.E. The only examples we are to follow are of Christ's church. Christ's church is commanded to sing. Christ's church is not commanded to play. That is nothing but plain logic.

celticpiping wrote:ps. it's stuff like this the enemy uses to prevent some folks from even considering the claims of Christ(MHO)

This makes me think of the dangerous concepts of "I'm ok you're ok." Follow your own path" "The church of your choice." "Many paths, on destination"

Christ said in John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

That indicates one. Which brings us to Eph 4:4There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; 5One Lord, one faith, one baptism, 6One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.

There are some churches who are spineless. They tell you what you want to hear. This reminds me of this passage.
I Cor 1:10 Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and [that] there be no divisions among you; but [that] ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.

The only way we can please God in this way (speak the same thing and have no division) is to use the NT as our only guide. I.E. When hundred of years passed from the institution of Christ's church and people tried to introduce musical instruments it caused major division. The solution? Do only what the bible said. Speak the same thing. The same thing to be spoken is that the NT church has only singing as musical worship. It really is that simple.

Again I submit that the only reason you so readily accept instruments is that your parents and parents parents etc etc accepted it. When it's put in front of you like this and you can read the associated passages for yourself well... it's up to you. It's not my opinion. It's what you can read in God's inspired word.


celticpiping wrote: pps. ok
"If the scriptures didn't say to do it we must not add it."

applied to it's logical extent...anything we use todat that the NT does not "authorize" would be banned from the worship service.
Can you see how crazy that reasoning would be?
Microphones, lecturns, overhead lights, collection plates, sound recorders,................

I don't see how that could be viewed as crazy at all. I see it as scripturally sound. As respecting the authority of scripture. No items of worship may be added to or modified. Using mics amplify sound. It doesn't modify the sound or the message. It provides clarity and provides a way to reach more ears. It's just louder. More importantly an example of amplification was Christ's use of water. In Luke 5 He got into a boat and asked to be pushed out. Sound carries over water. It didn't modify the message. It just upped the volume. None of those items you listed modify the worship. We have to have lights to see. We have to have something to put the collection in. Sound recorders are unseen and simply repeat the message for those who otherwise would not be able to hear. So none of those things change the worship. They don't add an element to the worship. Instruments add a whole element to the worship. And they adversely affect the singing in my opinion. They also encourage members to sit back and not participate.

If we respect the authority of God's written will for us. If we simply follow the NT pattern of the original church. We will do the following.


1. Lord's Supper - The New Testament and early church history record that Christians met on the first day of every week (Sunday) to worship God and remember Christ (Acts 20:7; I Corinthians 11:23-34; 16:1-2).
2. Prayer - (Acts 2:42; Philippians 4:6-7; I Thessalonians 5:17-18).
3. Singing - God's word authorizes only vocal music and specifically singing (Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16; Hebrews 2:12). The New Testament shows no use of mechanical instruments of music in worship to God by the church Christ established. Church history notes no such use for nearly 700 years after the New Testament was completed. It is an innovation of men, not of God.
4. Giving - Free-willed, cheerful generous, and every week (Acts 20:35; I Corinthians 16:1-2; 2 Corinthians 8:9).
5. Preaching of the Word - The gospel of Christ, not men's doctrines nor entertainment, saves and strengthens us (Acts 2:42; 20:7; Romans 10:17; I Corinthians 1:18-23)[/b]

#148119 by TheCaptain
Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:51 pm
points to you Paul, for always remaining civil.

and I thought MY faith was exclusive...

:shock:

peace,
R

ps. I don't agree with infant baptism: despite being baptised as a Catholic

#148120 by neanderpaul
Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:14 pm
Thanks Rich. :D

I just believe God wrote the bible using the hand of man as nothing more than a pencil. It is my only guide and final authority.

#148130 by TheCaptain
Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:39 pm
I think you're flat wrong.
I think the whole denomination is wrong in the conclusion, and some methods used to reach it.
But, and here's the great thing: we can agree to disagree.

I'd like to think it won't "divide" us however...unless the idea is that your church is the "one true church": in which case...we do divide.


If you are nothing else, you are strong in your convictions.
That's a rare commodity in these fickle days.

cheers,
R

#148141 by gbheil
Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:49 pm
The one true church is the body of Christ, legalism aside.
Christians are the body of Christ and the church.
Christ said.
Anyplace that two or more gather in my name I be there also.

Don't need any denomination to interpret that for me.

#148168 by PaperDog
Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:15 pm
neanderpaul wrote:Thanks Rich. :D

I just believe God wrote the bible using the hand of man as nothing more than a pencil. It is my only guide and final authority.


The Nicene creed: (in case anybody thinks's their way of worship is the only way)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicene_Creed

AND:

"Make a joyful noise unto God, all ye lands: sing forth the honour of his name: make his praise glorious."
-- Psalm 66:1–2

"I will praise the name of God with a song, and will magnify him with thanksgiving."
-- Psalm 69:30


"Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom; teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord."
-- Colossians 3:16

"Serve the Lord with gladness: come before his presence with singing."
-- Psalm 100:2

AND FINALLY

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_music

#148170 by neanderpaul
Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:48 am
sanshouheil wrote:The one true church is the body of Christ, legalism aside.
Christians are the body of Christ and the church.
Christ said.
Anyplace that two or more gather in my name I be there also.

Don't need any denomination to interpret that for me.


Yes, yes, yes and yes.

#148172 by Sir Jamsalot
Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:04 am
The Exclusive Psalmody position is still being debated. It's good to understand EP pertains only to the worship service - not informal or private gatherings - that is to say, the time between the "call to worship" and the "benediction".

The Psalms, Hymns and Spiritual songs referenced in Ephesians is one of the main focal points of debate. I would encourage those interested in the topic to see what has already been argued - something that often happens in these types of discussions is that people just think the argument is too obvious to merit investigation, but if you dig into the arguments you'll see there really is substance behind both positions to consider. People have a tendency to lean on their own definitions of terms instead of letting the source (the bible) define those terms.

Meanings and inferences go in and out of "style." Common parlance is the result of societal norms, slang, well known events, coined phrases based on public figures, etc. bringing new meanings to old terms, or simply being forgotten - only those aware of them fully appreciate the references.

For instance, a year ago, the term weiner was pretty much out of style, having been replaced with other types of profanity - but now, after Weiner-Gate, it conjures all sorts of notions and humor - can you imagine reading a novel written 10 years ago making reference to a Weinter dog? The temptation now would be to superimpose a new idea / meaning of what that means. I know, it's a crude analogy, but certainly the author in said book had no idea the term Weiner could have taken on new connotations and meaning.

The challenge is to get inside of the author's mind to understand what the author intended to convey by his/her word choices. There is such a language game under consideration with the term "Spritual" and "Hymn" in the context of Ephesians and Colossians. So understanding the culture and what was available to the recipients of Paul's letters at that time, is worth understanding when those terms are used.

Anyways, if you're interested in reading up on some of the already-covered-ground on the topic, Google Exclusive Psalmody, or the EP debate.

Here is one link I dug up after reading this interesting thread.

http://exclusivepsalmody.com/2010/11/18 ... n-worship/

There's also a good audio debate I listened to about 4 years ago that is now up on youtube? I found it entertaining

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkipWUu7Nzw

Enjoy!
Cheers!


PaperDog wrote:
neanderpaul wrote:Thanks Rich. :D

I just believe God wrote the bible using the hand of man as nothing more than a pencil. It is my only guide and final authority.


The Nicene creed: (in case anybody thinks's their way of worship is the only way)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicene_Creed

AND:

"Make a joyful noise unto God, all ye lands: sing forth the honour of his name: make his praise glorious."
-- Psalm 66:1–2

"I will praise the name of God with a song, and will magnify him with thanksgiving."
-- Psalm 69:30


"Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom; teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord."
-- Colossians 3:16

"Serve the Lord with gladness: come before his presence with singing."
-- Psalm 100:2

AND FINALLY

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_music

#148174 by MikeTalbot
Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:22 am
My Lutheran synod (Wisconsin called WELS) has it's doctrine spelled out clearly based on scripture, and we do believe ourselves to be the 'true' church. Yet Luther himself said the Christian church is best described as the invisible church - God can choose Whom he wants of any denomination.

I explained that to a Morman friend and he told me he appreciated it- he'd think me a fool if I attended a church about which I couldn't believe that.

As to God being a bad ass...Yep. It's His universe and He only can define right and wrong. Yet He never acts out of meanness. To learn how He really feels about that sort of thing read Jonah. It's short and explains that God simply cannot by His nature, abide sin. Yet it is His wish that people repent which pleases him much more than waxing them.

I find it interesting that people say "I won't worship a God like that!" Well, you don't have to. But it's the only game in town and you got to play to win.

Talbot

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests