in my area I find playing free is not an issue, but playing really cheap is. Some of the bands were willing to play for really low fees a while back, apparently, now all the clubs want everyone to play really cheap.
Sorry folks, but if I have to load up all my equipment, drive 45 miles and setup, play 4 sets then load up and get home at 4AM, I'm not doing it for $50...I was making $100 and up a night in 1985, it's 20 years later and if you tell a club owner here you want $100 a man, they claim they can't afford it.
One band wanted me to drive 3 hours to play for $75. I tried it 4 times, made $10 one time, the others cost me. I told them forget it, I'm not in this to pay to play...At least 3 sets of strings, 6 hours drive time, load and unload a lot of equipment, get home at 6AM falling asleep at the wheel, and it costs me $10-20? NOPE...
I'll play free if it's a benefit for a good cause, (would be nice to at least get $20 gas money though) or at a friend's house and someone wants me to play a little, but if I have to pack up the gear and travel, I'm not loading up without a solid agreement for enough financial compensation to make it worthwhile.
Uploading music...
That's a hot topic these days, thanks ot the RIAA, who have been ripping off the artists they claim to be protecting for years. Why do you think the average recording artist might make $0.85 per CD that costs you $17? Between the RIAA and the record companies, the other $16 is never going to be seen by the people who actually did the work of writing and recording the songs. This is not new, the Beatles made around $0.02 per album, the most popular group in the world, when albums cost around $4. Most groups leave the studio in debt $50,000 or more, they make their money playing live, not selling CD's. In most cases, CD sales won't even pay back the record company for advances and studio time. Except for multi-million sellers like the top 5 songs...the ymight break even, might even profit from CD sales. Everyone else better be gigging...
Check out Janis Ian's article Internet Debacle
Here and the Followup article listed just below it. Great article about the pros and cons of music downloading and its affect on her sales and thinking.
Yes, you're making your music available for free. The Baen Library has been doing the same thing with science fiction authors, in every case they see their sales increase immediately after uploading a book or song.
People download a song or entire album and will then order the original CD just to get the artwork and liner notes, or to play at home in the stereo as opposed to the mp3 player in the car or jogging.. They will also buy other CDs by the same artist, often just on the basis of one good song downloaded free.
The same was true years ago with cassette tapes, and the RIAA screamed then too, then they went on to make bazillions of dollars selling cassettes. Ditto for VHS video tapes. I've done tha tmyself, get a cassette from a friend...Here, check this band out...then I'll go buy the same album or a different one. Jethro Tull became one of my favorite groups as a result of a cassette someone gave me in 1971. I'd heard Aqualung and Locomotive Breath on radio, but had no idea what else they did. A free copy of Aqualung and I was hooked, I now have at least a dozen Tull albums and several CDs.
Same for several other groups. I'm seeing the same with music downloading, I'm hoping the income situation gets a lot better before long, because I know of several groups I want to look for, as a result of a song someone downloaded and played for me.
Am I going to upload my music? You bet, wouldn't pass up that kind of exposure at all. But I already know, before I start, it will pay off.