This is a MUSIC forum. Irrelevant or disrespectful posts/topics will be removed by Admin. Please report any forum spam or inappropriate posts HERE.

All users can post to this forum on general music topics.

Moderators: bandmixmod1, jimmy990, spikedace

#119906 by CraigMaxim
Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:52 am
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/08/magazine/08music-t.html


The NY Times
The Music-Copyright Enforcers
By JOHN BOWE
Published: August 6, 2010


Few things can make Devon Baker cry.



There was the time her pet hamster, Herschel, died. There was the time she was run over by a car. Neither episode provoked tears. Not even close. And yet, on a recent Thursday, as Baker drove down Highway 60, about 55 miles northwest of Phoenix, she had to wonder, Is today one of those days when I’m gonna cry?

Baker, who has preternaturally white teeth, green eyes, soft brown hair and a friendly way that she’s the first to describe as “country,” was on her once-a-month, weeklong road trip. She’d flown to Phoenix to meet with bar and restaurant owners to discuss a rather straightforward business proposal. Off she went on her rounds each day, navigating with a special Microsoft Streets and Trips plan she prepared in advance, with 60 to 80 venues marked with dots, triangles or blue squares, according to size, dollar value and priority, wearing her company badge with photo ID, hoping for a little friendly discussion. Except it didn’t always work out so friendly.

Once, a venue owner exploded, kicked her off his property and told her, as she recalled, “to get the bleep outta here.” Another hissed at her that she was “nothing more than a vulture that flew over and came down and ate up all of the little people.” It wasn’t fun. It was just the sort of thing, in fact, that could bring Devon Baker to tears.

Baker, 30, is a licensing executive with Broadcast Music Incorporated, otherwise known as BMI. The firm is a P.R.O., or performing rights organization; P.R.O.’s license the music of the songwriters and music publishers they represent, collecting royalties whenever that music is played in a public setting. Which means that if you buy a CD by, say, Ryan Adams, or download one of his songs from iTunes, and play it at your family reunion, even if 500 people come, you owe nothing. But if you play it at a restaurant you own, then you must pay for the right to harness Adams’s creativity to earn money for yourself. Which leaves you with three choices: you can track down Ryan Adams, make a deal with him and pay him directly; you can pay a licensing fee to the P.R.O. that represents him — in this case, BMI; or you can ignore the issue altogether and hope not to get caught.

P.R.O.’s like BMI spend much of their energy negotiating licenses with the biggest users of music — radio stations, TV and cable networks, film studios, streaming Internet music sites and so on. But a significant portion of BMI’s business is to “educate” and charge — by phone and in person — the hundreds of thousands of businesses across America that don’t know or don’t care to know that they have to pay for the music they use. Besides the more obvious locales like bars and nightclubs, the list of such venues includes: funeral parlors, grocery stores, sports arenas, fitness centers, retirement homes — tens of thousands of businesses, playing a collective many billions of songs per year.

Most Americans have no problem with BMI charging for its music — except when they do. As Richard Conlon, a vice president at BMI in charge of new media, put it: “A few years back, we had Penn, Schoen and Berland, Hillary’s pollster guys, do a study. The idea was, go and find out what Americans really think about copyright. Do songwriters deserve to be paid? Absolutely! The numbers were enormously favorable — like, 85 percent. The poll asked, ‘If there was a party that wasn’t compensating songwriters, do you think that would be wrong?’ And the answer was, ‘Yes!’ So then, everything’s fine, right? Wrong. Because when it came time to ask people to part with their shekels, it was like: ‘Eww. You want me to pay?’ ”

The day I accompanied her on her rounds, Baker was four days into her trip, on her way to Coyote Flats Cafe and Bar in the hamlet of Aguila. As we drove along Highway 60, the sunlight glared, hawks circled and the temperature was 100 degrees. Saguaro cactuses stood 30, 40-feet tall, stiffly riding up the foothills like porcupine quills. Baker mused about a picture she found online while researching the business. It depicted Coyote Flats’s owner, Dorene Ross, posing with her husband, Jim, for The Arizona Republic. There they were standing behind the cafe counter, she with a .380 Firestorm, he with a 9-millimeter Smith and Wesson. The article was about the lengths they were willing to go to defend their business from local thieves. It wasn’t exactly auspicious, given the volatile nature of Baker’s client interactions.



ARTICLE CONTINUED HERE:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/08/magazine/08music-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=2


#119907 by Krul
Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:02 am
I say just learn how to start your own publishing company. I have a book on it I have yet to read about, but from skimming through the pages it doesen't look that hard to do.

Seems like in this day and age anything DIY is a good thing.

I don't think an artist should get paid everytime any band plays their music live, except for maybe an arena event. Even then, I don't really see it as necessary but more of an honor to the original writer/writers.

#119957 by J-HALEY
Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:21 pm
Between the P.R.O's strongarming a little dive over cover bands playing their songs when they are already paying through their jukeboxes, and the strict D.U.I. laws, drink one beer and your D.U.I. its no wonder a hard working musician can't find a descent paying gig anymore. I fear the days of the coverband may soon be over! :cry:

#119963 by gbheil
Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:16 pm
Too much control is not good for any industry or endeavor.

Live music will shine again. But it will no longer fit into the old mold of presentation.
Evolve or parish. This is the way of life.

#119978 by philbymon
Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:15 pm
sans - you are quite the philosopher today!

When you said "evolve or parish," I doubt that you had this 'parish' in mind, though -

"A parish is a territorial unit that was usually historically served by a parish church or local church."*

Back to the subject at hand:

I have a hard time with the copyright thugs, cuz I don't know that I can trust their methods of payment to the composer.

I also wonder about the morality of charging for a song that's being played in a live setting, as opposed to a recorded one. It seems that there's way too much moolah going into the coffers of the industry, & way too little in those of the artists & the composers.

Who REALLY makes more money off of the work - Peter Gabriel, for example, or Geffen Records, & their subsidiaries, & the touring co's, & all the others involved? He's just a cog in the machine, like the rest of us, no matter how big he gets.

I dunno if that right or wrong...it doesn't SEEM right...




















* from wiki

#119982 by fisherman bob
Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:50 pm
What IS the fee that a local dive has to pay annually to play covers? Is it under $1000 or over $1000? Do musicians who are members of BMI ever receive any of the funds collected from a dive? Or are those funds used to pay the salaries of the collecting agents? Is this a case of money never reaching those it was intended to reach? Or is this like the stimulus bill where we have NO IDEA of where every penny ends up? Anything involving red tape, lawyers, etc. ends up being a black hole and the vast majority or all the money ends up disappearing. I wonder if BMI is even worth belonging to for the average musician.

#119994 by Starfish Scott
Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:42 am
BMI = Bowel Movement International..

#119998 by J-HALEY
Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:27 am
I have no problem with folks that deserve to be paid. I just find it damned hilarious that the record co. have put themselfs in the position that "there is no such thing as original thought anymore we are all just regurgitating the same old thoughts welling them down to a HUGE pot of mediocrite" LMFAO! Now that their little packages are not selling MILLIONS a day they have to go to some little dive and STRONGARM some poor hard working folks out of a few bucks! MAKES ME SICK!

Hey BMI WHERE THE HELL ARE MY ROYALTY PAYMENTS! Reminds me of why I BURNED MY f**k union card! I don't need you SCHMUCKS!Thanks FOR NUTHIN ASSHOLES!
BMI YOU MADE YOUR BED NOW TAKE YOUR OLE ASS AND DIE or just PALEEZE! go away! END RANT! :evil:

#120000 by Slacker G
Wed Aug 11, 2010 3:10 am
Lawyers make the world go round. Unfortunately only in a downward spiral.

#120007 by fisherman bob
Wed Aug 11, 2010 3:58 am
And then I never understood the logic about some podunk dive that has cover bands is denying the artists revenue. What revenue? Maybe instead of BMI enforcing the "law" on EVERY dive maybe those that make a profit would be billed a small percentage of their profit. Most places are having such a hard time making a living that all these fees and regulations and smoking bans, etc. should only apply to those venues that post a profit every year. Also when bands play covers they are also promoting those artists' songs. I've heard numerous songs live that I never heard before and asked the bands who did a particular song and was turned on to a new album or CD. The cover venues that don't pay their BMI fees are probably making more profit for the artists than those venues that do pay the fees...

#120014 by philbymon
Wed Aug 11, 2010 7:59 am
The local bar tells me that their fee is over a thousand a year.

#120016 by Krul
Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:55 am
What does the future hold for tribute bands? Many of those bands make their living off of what they do. If there's gonna be a corporate crackdown, then they would be one of the record industry's first targets.

#120021 by jimmydanger
Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:29 pm
Bars that host cover bands should pay the fees. They already make money off from the bands, should they make money from the original artists and publishers? I find it disturbing that anyone who calls themself a musician would not stand up for artist's intellectual rights. People think nothing about illegally downloading or sharing music, software, etc. I say that's a bad omen for artists, writers and software developers.

#120022 by gbheil
Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:47 pm
:twisted: Darn that spell check. :twisted:

:lol:

Thanks Phil. Despite the spelling I'm sure everyone knew what I meant :wink:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest