Okay, Craig! I'll play your little one-upmanship game again.
WHAT words have I put in your mouth? I only use your real words, unlike you when you twist the words of others, or draw really far out conclusions based on I don't know what, to "prove" how right you are.
WHERE's your "proof" that I'm full of it? I love how you just print out glittering generalities that I'm supposed to accept as "fact." Typical right-wing attack scheme, but unless you back it up, you're talking out your ass.
I pointed out that there is nothing wrong with LL's refusal to be on that show. I'll add to that statement. He does PLENTY of good on his own, bub. He doesn't need to fly the Palin flag to do good. He was one of the first to take his genre out of the hands of the gangsta rappers, but I guess that doesn't mean anything in the face of the fact that he doesn't want to be associated with this incredibly divisive & controversial celebrity, right?
Would you be as outraged if he refused to go on Letterman, as others have done? Or Oprah? I doubt it. How about a Michael Moore program? Of course not. But just mention Palin & your spidy senses go crazy as hell, don't they? GET A GRIP, Glutes! You really need health care! You have a terrible case of "Testicular Dementia." Those bad ol' TD's will getcha every time Palin's ugly name surfaces in any conversation.
You may even be right about one thing, Craig (& ONLY one thing, in all of your lashing out & insulting & your typically overemotional & irrationally overboard response), that there's nothing wrong with this common media practice, but that in no way removes LL's right to do what he would for his own career. Being associated with her would surely hurt him with some of his fans. Nothing personal, just biz. Even if it IS personal, it's within his rights to have his own opinion, which is something that you abhor, evidently.
Once again, you are so eager to be right that you ignore how wrongly you have treated us in this thread. You owe many an apology, but I don't expect it'll be forthcoming, cuz you have a bad attitude toward anyone who dares to disagree with you on anything.
I finally called her a "bee-otch" after you kept ramming your preferences & your abuse down my throat, Craig. I don't like Palin. It doesn't even matter why I don't like her. Get used to the fact that there are a whole helluva lot of ppl that think she's a bad example, a crappy celebrity, a lousy politician, & a poor entertainer for any number of reasons, & you will NOT change our minds on it, no matter how you insult us. And, frankly, the more you insult me for my personal opinions, the more I want to see you get all apoplectic & giggle at your tantrums. You are SO easy to bait that I cannot believe your claims of having such a high IQ, cuz you come off as stupid as any of those other trailer park philosophers that I see Palin pandering to.
I honestly can't stand her. I think she's disingenuous at best, & works against my well-being, in the name of her celebrity status. I find her debate tactics & her personal attacks on our pres to be in rather poor taste, & yes, I think she belongs in a trailer park with someone just like you, Craig, rather than on our national tv programming, from what I see of her behavior, which, to me, emulates the worst parts of the Beck/Limbaugh style, all too often.
I see nothing irrational in any of that. It's how I see her, & you cannot dispute what I see.
I don't give a flying flook about being PC, as you've seen innumerable times in many of my posts, & you damned well know it, so your argument here, once again, fails to hit home. To even suggest it shows how desperate you are for some sort of credibility, but again, you fail to achieve it due to your failure to contain your emotions, idiot.
You aren't right in any way, Craig, just a right-wing nut who seems on the edge of becoming a stalker, with all of your loving statements for this anti-American woman. You are way too caught up in your own rhetoric & your own emotions to even understand or listen to what ppl say to you. You continue to attack without cause, & cry "foul" when you get someone bored or fed up enough to retort to you in your own fashion.
You haven't a leg to stand on anywhere in this thread on anything other than your opinion, which I won't dispute you having, but I think it's a wrong one, still. Your attacks have removed your credibility & your intelligence is over-ridden by your emotional outbursts yet again. Take your emotions out of the argument, & you have nothing worthwhile to say, evidently.
Oh, & yes, I DID call her "anti-American,"too. I would consider anyone thus who does everything they can to keep the ppl from getting that which they vote for, all while trying her very best to incite the public to riot. She's a huge spoiler for freedom & the American process. She is the nastiest person out there, but her beauty sure fools a lot of fools, doesn't it, you smitten child?
No, Craig. You are NOT right & the rest of the world wrong. You're just blind, & not very intelligent, when it comes to women, as far as I can tell.
WHAT words have I put in your mouth? I only use your real words, unlike you when you twist the words of others, or draw really far out conclusions based on I don't know what, to "prove" how right you are.
WHERE's your "proof" that I'm full of it? I love how you just print out glittering generalities that I'm supposed to accept as "fact." Typical right-wing attack scheme, but unless you back it up, you're talking out your ass.
I pointed out that there is nothing wrong with LL's refusal to be on that show. I'll add to that statement. He does PLENTY of good on his own, bub. He doesn't need to fly the Palin flag to do good. He was one of the first to take his genre out of the hands of the gangsta rappers, but I guess that doesn't mean anything in the face of the fact that he doesn't want to be associated with this incredibly divisive & controversial celebrity, right?
Would you be as outraged if he refused to go on Letterman, as others have done? Or Oprah? I doubt it. How about a Michael Moore program? Of course not. But just mention Palin & your spidy senses go crazy as hell, don't they? GET A GRIP, Glutes! You really need health care! You have a terrible case of "Testicular Dementia." Those bad ol' TD's will getcha every time Palin's ugly name surfaces in any conversation.
You may even be right about one thing, Craig (& ONLY one thing, in all of your lashing out & insulting & your typically overemotional & irrationally overboard response), that there's nothing wrong with this common media practice, but that in no way removes LL's right to do what he would for his own career. Being associated with her would surely hurt him with some of his fans. Nothing personal, just biz. Even if it IS personal, it's within his rights to have his own opinion, which is something that you abhor, evidently.
Once again, you are so eager to be right that you ignore how wrongly you have treated us in this thread. You owe many an apology, but I don't expect it'll be forthcoming, cuz you have a bad attitude toward anyone who dares to disagree with you on anything.
I finally called her a "bee-otch" after you kept ramming your preferences & your abuse down my throat, Craig. I don't like Palin. It doesn't even matter why I don't like her. Get used to the fact that there are a whole helluva lot of ppl that think she's a bad example, a crappy celebrity, a lousy politician, & a poor entertainer for any number of reasons, & you will NOT change our minds on it, no matter how you insult us. And, frankly, the more you insult me for my personal opinions, the more I want to see you get all apoplectic & giggle at your tantrums. You are SO easy to bait that I cannot believe your claims of having such a high IQ, cuz you come off as stupid as any of those other trailer park philosophers that I see Palin pandering to.
I honestly can't stand her. I think she's disingenuous at best, & works against my well-being, in the name of her celebrity status. I find her debate tactics & her personal attacks on our pres to be in rather poor taste, & yes, I think she belongs in a trailer park with someone just like you, Craig, rather than on our national tv programming, from what I see of her behavior, which, to me, emulates the worst parts of the Beck/Limbaugh style, all too often.
I see nothing irrational in any of that. It's how I see her, & you cannot dispute what I see.
I don't give a flying flook about being PC, as you've seen innumerable times in many of my posts, & you damned well know it, so your argument here, once again, fails to hit home. To even suggest it shows how desperate you are for some sort of credibility, but again, you fail to achieve it due to your failure to contain your emotions, idiot.
You aren't right in any way, Craig, just a right-wing nut who seems on the edge of becoming a stalker, with all of your loving statements for this anti-American woman. You are way too caught up in your own rhetoric & your own emotions to even understand or listen to what ppl say to you. You continue to attack without cause, & cry "foul" when you get someone bored or fed up enough to retort to you in your own fashion.
You haven't a leg to stand on anywhere in this thread on anything other than your opinion, which I won't dispute you having, but I think it's a wrong one, still. Your attacks have removed your credibility & your intelligence is over-ridden by your emotional outbursts yet again. Take your emotions out of the argument, & you have nothing worthwhile to say, evidently.
Oh, & yes, I DID call her "anti-American,"too. I would consider anyone thus who does everything they can to keep the ppl from getting that which they vote for, all while trying her very best to incite the public to riot. She's a huge spoiler for freedom & the American process. She is the nastiest person out there, but her beauty sure fools a lot of fools, doesn't it, you smitten child?
No, Craig. You are NOT right & the rest of the world wrong. You're just blind, & not very intelligent, when it comes to women, as far as I can tell.
