Look lads, no-one here on these boards(evil Repubs included) wants to see folks NOT be able to see a Dr.
And maybe somethign major HAS to be done.
But, if you zoom waaay out, and look at the 10,000 foot level,
have you yourself complained about our nations debt?
Have you complained about your kids inheriting the ever-increasing national debt?
You cannot argue that we are basically going to spend money we simply do not have.
Period.
And, I don;t think it takes a rocket scientist, nor a java programmer to understand the danger: the immense danger of expecting/assuming that our Government will actually have our best interests in mind when they amass such huge quantities of wealth to pay for this.(paid out of where btw.increased tax burden(s)?)
Lads, this thing comes down to what I've ALWAYS said: worldview.
Again, if you're ok with this so-called "level playing field", where capitalism is gradually beaten down, and centralized management/redistribution of wealth is considered the ideal/better way, then well, I guess you proceed & vote accordingly.
Corrupt/greedy people will always screw it up.
For example: My wife & I are about to (hopefully) adopt one, if not two Haitian orphans.
When asked by a friend of ours of the pastor who runs this particular orphanage why the Haitian govt is taking so long to process their paperwork for their girl, this fellow replied it's because "the govt(Haiti's) is waiting to see if they will be bribed first."
Another worldview point of departure for many: People like me do not believe that we humans are naturally inclined toward good.
Call me crazy, but um...read the local newspaper if you can stomach it.
ok, I've said enough: and probably made more enemies.
I do believe there can/ought to be a debate had here.
And it's one that ought to center around
1) economics
2) whether or not it's proper to say health care is a RIGHT
3) possible alternative angles to take on the issues facing health delivery
4) a thousand other things
Not in that particular order...
enough
Rich
And maybe somethign major HAS to be done.
But, if you zoom waaay out, and look at the 10,000 foot level,
have you yourself complained about our nations debt?
Have you complained about your kids inheriting the ever-increasing national debt?
You cannot argue that we are basically going to spend money we simply do not have.
Period.
And, I don;t think it takes a rocket scientist, nor a java programmer to understand the danger: the immense danger of expecting/assuming that our Government will actually have our best interests in mind when they amass such huge quantities of wealth to pay for this.(paid out of where btw.increased tax burden(s)?)
Lads, this thing comes down to what I've ALWAYS said: worldview.
Again, if you're ok with this so-called "level playing field", where capitalism is gradually beaten down, and centralized management/redistribution of wealth is considered the ideal/better way, then well, I guess you proceed & vote accordingly.
Corrupt/greedy people will always screw it up.
For example: My wife & I are about to (hopefully) adopt one, if not two Haitian orphans.
When asked by a friend of ours of the pastor who runs this particular orphanage why the Haitian govt is taking so long to process their paperwork for their girl, this fellow replied it's because "the govt(Haiti's) is waiting to see if they will be bribed first."
Another worldview point of departure for many: People like me do not believe that we humans are naturally inclined toward good.
Call me crazy, but um...read the local newspaper if you can stomach it.
ok, I've said enough: and probably made more enemies.
I do believe there can/ought to be a debate had here.
And it's one that ought to center around
1) economics
2) whether or not it's proper to say health care is a RIGHT
3) possible alternative angles to take on the issues facing health delivery
4) a thousand other things
Not in that particular order...
enough
Rich