neanderpaul wrote:I disagree. There are so many more elements to mma to contend with.
I never said there wasn't. Of course there's more to contend with. That's
not the point...
neanderpaul wrote:I think that adds to the drama. Is the guys elbow going to hyper extended? Is he going to get kneed in the head? Is he going to be choked out?
Of course - that adds to the drama. But when you're adding to an already small number, it doesn't mean much
compared to something else that is more dramatic. There are degrees of drama. I didn't say MMA had *no* drama - I said it was lacking compared to boxing.
neanderpaul wrote:Plus boxing can be more dangerous. 3 knockdowns?!?
You didn't click the link, did you? Sigh...
neanderpaul wrote:That would never happen in the UFC. That is when brain damage occurs. Once you're loopy in the UFC it's over.
Exactly my point. There's no chance for drama. The guy gets choked and it's all over. There's no chance for a comeback, no chance for redemption. No chance for a change in strategy to affect the outcome. No chance to see a guy
dig deep and pull it out of himself.
Watch the YouTube I linked to. Because that's what I'm talking about.
Hey - I'm not saying MMA is not fun to watch, is not entertaining, and has zero drama. I'm not saying that. I'm not dissing your sport. I've watched it. I've seen Couture and Silva and watched the stuff on Spike. My brother-in-law loves the UFC.
What I'm saying is - and I'm trying to be precise here - there's a real difference between the two sports. And what MMA/UFC lacks is an artistry and drama that great boxing matches have.
I'm not trying to argue boxing in general - even average boxing matches can be pretty boring. But the exceptional matches... Haggler/Hearns/Leonard, Corrales/Castillo... They have something no MMA or UFC fight has yet to show me.