General Chat (Non-Music-Related)

"Always interesting were the articles listed in the first part of their publication (National Rifleman??). A two page listing (every month) of serious crime prevention by use of arms."

That was always the best part of that publication for me also. I love reading where the "bad guy" ends up face to face with the intended "victim" holding a weapon pointed right between the bad guys eyes. Many times the "victim" has forced them to sit down and wait for the cops. Using your second amendment rights generally discourages the uninvited bully in your home.

It might take the cops 10-20 minutes to get there, but Smith & Wesson are there within seconds.

The FBI investigation showed that he was NOT gay. He was casing the place. .

And you actually believe he did that dozens of times over many years? And I suppose his school mate that said he was "fishing" was all part of that set up?

nope...sounds more like another cover up to protect the guilty.




.

"And you actually believe he did that dozens of times over many years? And I suppose his school mate that said he was "fishing" was all part of that set up? nope...sounds more like another cover up to protect the guilty."

That sounds like more distraction propaganda to me.

I agree on the protect the guilty, which is ISLAMIC terrorism and his muslim affiliation.. However I do believe the FBI stating he was not gay was fact. Who benefits by the Gay spew? Those who wish pass his hatred off as not being inspired by islam. That is who benefits by it. Just as when the left always blame Christians and right wingers untill it is proved otherwise. And if he was such a devout muslim that he would follow the command to kill the infidel I doubt that he would not also know what they quran says about being gay. Perhaps it took him years to find the courage to do what he did, which is also a possibility within reason.
Only those wishing to protect the name of islam have anything to gain by the gay spew distraction in my opinion, and it is a distraction. I just don't see anyone else who would benefit by that. Look at how they tried to modify their reports by removing all muslim reference to the phone calls and how the command from on high has been decreed not use references to Islam in any future terror reports or investigations. http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/21/obama ... cial-says/

But we each have the choice to believe what we wish to believe and each form their own opinion. I simply disagree with you on this one.

An awful lot of young boys in Afghanistan wish that were true.

Talbot

"Who benefits by the Gay spew? .

What difference does that make if it's true? I don't see how that "helps" anyone.

I have no horse in the race. Only concerned with the truth and the evidence is that he was a closet gay. If you think a muslim can't be gay, then you think a priest couldn't be a pedophile.

It's the whole "forbidden fruit" thing.




.