Do you suppose potus drop his $100 a lb steak dinners for this? I'm sure he will. He's not a hypocrite. Have you tree huggers started eating bugs yet to save your planet ? It well may save the world. Of course you already know that, 
This is a good news- bad news- good news article grouping. The last article will truly gives man hope for the future.
....................................................................................................................
Eat Bugs, Improve Health, Save the Planet, Says UN
Monday, 24 November 2014 17:24 By Kristen Schepker | Assistant Editor
http://www.holisticprimarycare.net/topi ... ys-un.html
Scientists project that by 2050, the world's population will reach a staggering 9 billion people. Our growing presence will undoubtedly impact the health of the planet in untold ways, raising significant questions regarding land use, agricultural production, and food security.
Fried water bugsExperts suggest that sooner rather than later, we need to identify creative solutions to these upcoming ecological challenges. One solution, proposed by the United Nations and other environmental advocates, may be hard for some to swallow. Their suggestion? Eat more insects!
Indeed, there has been a lot of...ahem...buzz about insect-based foods lately, and while mainstream American palates may not quite be ready for edible bugs, products made with insect proteins have begun to enter the natural foods and healthy living markets in this country.
Throughout the world, an estimated 2 billion people regularly consume insects, a practice known as entomophagy. Plentiful, relatively easy to raise (or capture) and much less expensive than other animal based proteins, a host of insects and other bugs including spiders and scorpions are a regular part of traditional diets in many African, Asian, and Latin American cultures.
Grubs of the palm weevil, a species of snout beetle, are fried and eaten in several parts of western Nigeria (Banjo et al. Af J Biotech. 2006; 5(3): 298-301). In Thailand, insects are used as ingredients in dishes including chili paste and salads (Yhoung-Aree et al. Eco F Nut. 1997; 36(2-4): 133-149). In Japan, boiled wasp larvae are cooked with soy sauce, sugar, and sake and served mixed with rice.
In a 2013 report, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) identified over 1,900 species of edible insects. Worldwide, beetles are the most commonly eaten type. But the huge range of edible insects reflects the extraordinary biodiversity of insect species and includes caterpillars, bees, ants, grasshoppers, and termites, among many others.
Insect eating is nothing new; in fact, it's probably as old as humankind itself. It was certainly widely known in Biblical times. The Jewish Kosher laws defined in the Old Testament generally prohibit the eating of insects, with the exception of:
"Winged swarming things that go upon all fours, which have jointed legs above their feet, wherewith to leap upon the earth" (Leviticus 11:20).
The scripture goes on to define four types of locusts that may be considered kosher, though locusts are seldom found in the diets of orthodox Jews.
The New Testament does describe John the Baptist as living on "locusts and wild honey," but generally speaking, insect eating is relatively rare in Christian cultures. Islamic rulings vary, with some schools deeming certain types of insects Halal (permissible) but others deciding that insects as a category are Haram (forbidden).
The Biblical restrictions are likely a major underlying reason why eating insects is so rare in countries and cultures with Judeo-Christian roots. In the rest of the world, however, edible bugs are a part of normal everyday life.
Nutritional Value
One of the most compelling arguments for more widespread insect consumption is their remarkable nutritional value. The unique nutrient profiles of various insect types are influenced by a number of factors—species, metamorphic stage, habitat, diet, method of preparation—but generally speaking, they're packed with protein, fiber, healthy fats, and essential vitamins and minerals.
The FAO report notes that some bugs are arguably even more healthful than conventional animal products. The protein content of certain insects is higher than that of chicken, eggs, and beef. And mealworms contain unsaturated omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in amounts comparable to those found in fish—and higher than those in cattle and pigs.
Chitin, a macromolecular compound that constitutes 90% of insect skin, conveys nutritional as well as medicinal value—it can slow bleeding, prevent thrombus, and support the healing of wounds (Chen et al. Ent Res. 2009; 39(5): 299–303).
Environmental Implications
In recent decades, cultures throughout the world have adopted increasingly westernized diets, with an emphasis on red meat consumption. Experts argue that at current rates, meat production cannot keep pace with the demands of a growing global population. Adequate protein intake is already a major concern for the world's 1 billion chronically hungry people.
Insect farming could play a key role in addressing these challenges.
In addition to their human health benefits, insects are an exceptionally sustainable food source. Widely accessible and abundant on earth, they comprise up to 80% of the entire animal kingdom; the class insecta alone contains more species than all other animal classes combined!
Unlike conventional livestock farming, insect farming is inexpensive, produces very little waste, and is extremely energy-efficient. Insects reproduce rapidly, reach full body mass quickly, and require minimal space for production.
Relative to cattle farming, which requires huge amounts of grain, water, and other inputs, insect farming utilizes far fewer resources. As reported in a recent edition of National Geographic, for a given quantity of feed insect farmers can produce vastly more edible protein than can beef, poultry or pork farmers.
It takes roughly 100 pounds of animal feed to yield 10 pounds of beef. In contrast, 100 pounds of bug fodder can yield 45 pounds of edible crickets. Indeed, crickets are estimated to be 20 times more efficient than cattle as a source of protein.
Edible insects also produce significantly smaller quantities of greenhouse gas. Livestock farming is one of the largest global contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, a known cause of climate change. Because insect farming is much cleaner than cattle farming, "insects could serve as a more environmentally friendly alternative for the production of animal protein." (Oonincx at al. PLoS One. 2010; 5(12): e14445).
Eating more insects could also reduce pesticide use, as more efficient methods of harvesting pest species for food are developed (DeFoliart. Eco F Nut. 1997; 36(2-4): 109-132.).
Cricket powder protein shakes
While the thought of eating bugs intrigues some adventurous foodies, it's one that many others just can't stomach. It questions our core sense of what is—and isn't—appropriate to eat.
Insect-eating advocates suggest that westerners' psychological barrier to bug consumption is a learned, cultural one. From a young age, we're taught that insects are dirty and gross and should be removed from our home environments, especially from our kitchens.
With the right reframing, squeamish skeptics might be able to unlearn their cultural aversion to bugs as food. Proponents argue that eating insects is really no different from consuming other wildly popular edible invertebrates like crabs, lobsters, or shrimp.
They also question our perception of insects as dirty creatures. Several major categories of edible insects, including grasshoppers, beetle larvae, and moth and butterfly larvae, eat a diet of fresh plant leaves and wood— which is much cleaner and more hygienic than the decaying animal flesh eaten by crabs and lobsters, to say nothing of the questionable sanitary conditions at the massive feedlots or poultry farms where most of our cattle, pigs and chickens are raised.
Some brave and savvy food manufacturers have taken note of recent efforts to promote global insect consumption. Brooklyn-based Exo (produces high-protein food bars made from cricket flour. Similarly, another local company called Bitty also uses cricket flour as a main ingredient in its baked goods.
These companies have capitalized on the belief that bugs represent the future of healthy, sustainable food. If they're right, it may be only a matter of time until insect meal replaces protein powder in post-workout shakes and elsewhere in our diets.
The FAO has already issued a call to action, urging that, "what we eat and how we produce it needs to be re-evaluated. Inefficiencies need to be rectified and food waste reduced. We need to find new ways of growing food."
Eating bugs might just be one of those new ways.
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
OOPS. Bad news about eating bugs. Please say it isn't so.
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Eating Insects Isn’t as Eco-Friendly As People Say
* Mandy Oaklander @mandyoaklander
April 20, 2015
SHARE
Insects: Our Food Of The Future? Sean Gallup—Getty Images Dried grasshoppers, mealworms and crickets seasoned with spices
Crickets aren't so green after all
http://time.com/3824917/crickets-sustainable-protein/
Crickets are often trumpeted as the future of food, an edible, eco-friendly solution to a some-day protein shortage that livestock just can’t fix. Even the United Nations promotes insect-eating as a promising, protein-packed way to feed the 9 billion people that will live on earth in 2050. “A benefit of insects as an alternative animal protein source is that they can be reared sustainably on organic side streams (e.g. manure, pig slurry and compost),” their report reads.
Because insects emit far fewer greenhouse gases than livestock and consume way less water, they have a comparatively tiny ecological footprint, and they’re thought to thrive on basically anything, even organic waste. That last point sums up the main ecological appeal of eating insects; growing the grain used in animal feed takes up huge water and energy resources.
But do crickets really have the potential to be the new beef? Not yet, according to a new study published in the journal PLOS ONE. When researchers raised crickets on several different diets and tried to see how much protein they could squeeze out of them, they got some disappointing results: just not a whole lot of protein.
MORE: Why, On Second Thought, Maybe You Shouldn’t Start Eating Bugs
In the experiment, researchers raised crickets on one of five different diets. They replicated each diet three time and harvested the crickets after two weeks. One group ate corn-, soy- and grain-based feed, while others survived on food waste or crop residue. The researchers measured how big the crickets grew and how much edible protein they produced.
Diet made a huge difference, the study authors found. Those that ate a diet of processed food waste had a feed and protein conversion rates no more efficient than that of chickens. Nearly all those fed straight food waste died before they could be harvested. And the most successful crickets were those that ate a grain-based diet similar to what most poultry eat. They had a 35% protein conversion rate, which is only slightly better than chickens.
So even if the whole world took a page out of Mexico’s cookbook and developed an appetite for chapulines—crunchy fried crickets—the small protein payoffs may not even be worth it if we’re feeding them what chickens eat, the authors suggest.
“I think the sustainability claims on this topic have been overstated given the current state of knowledge,” wrote study author Dr. Mark Lundy of the University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources in an e-mail.
Even if they can’t survive on as many organic sidestreams as we originally thought, Lundy doesn’t think that insects are out of the running as the future of food.
“I’m all for exploring alternatives, and I am impressed by the amount of innovation that has sprung up around insect cultivation and cuisine in the last few years,” he says. “However, I also think we need to be clear-eyed about what the sustainability gains are and aren’t, and focus our innovative efforts and limited resources to where they will have the most lasting impact.”
Swapping chickens for crickets–while feeding them the same thing—is unlikely to make a real difference. “Insect cultivation is more likely to contribute to human nutrition at a scale of economic and ecological significance if it does not rely on a diet that competes with conventional livestock,” he says, “but more innovation is needed for this to become a reality.”
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
There is a God after all !!! Breaking :// Good news for bug eaters!! Time to wipe away those tears.
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
School Just Found a Unique New Way to Dispose of Michelle’s Uneaten Lunches… She’ll HATE It
chris 1 min ago No Comments
http://conservativeread.com/school-just ... l-hate-it/
First Lady Michelle Obama has attempted to use the coercive power of the federal government to literally force schools to serve “healthy” food for lunch that meets unrealistically strict nutritional guidelines.
Of course, kids being kids, many have rebelled against the lunches, and schools have been inundated with waste as kids simply throw away the unappetizing lunches rather than eat them.
Now one school in South Carolina has devised a way to make use of the disgusting lunches that are filling up their trashcans — by finding something that is hungry enough to eat anything without caring what it tastes like.
Lower Richland High School has created something of a recycling program for the lunch waste, using worms to create compost that is then used in their solar-powered school greenhouse to grow their own fresh vegetables for use in the school’s culinary program.
Students_unhappy_with_new_school_menus
School feeds uneaten Michelle O lunches to worms.
The 30-panel solar array, along with a massive food dehydrator into which the wasted food is placed before being fed to the worms, were purchased with the help of a mix of federal and private grants.
According to EAGNews, the project has already cut down on the school’s waste by 50 to 70 percent.
“Everyday, the cafeteria was throwing away food in the past that wasn’t eaten or served,” said Carroll Kelley, supervisor of the school’s program. “So, now we put the food in the food dryer.”
Kelley explained how the school used to see about 200 pounds of organic waste produced by the kids each week. Now, about 20 to 40 pounds of that reusable waste is collected each day, put into the dehydrator, then fed to the worms, which produce approximately 10 to 20 pounds of compost.
“All the food waste we’ve had, we’ve saved so much from it,” student project supervisor Nazaire Bethea said. “We’re doing something productive with it.”
This is a great idea, and while some may quibble over the school’s use of federal grants to purchase the dehydrator and solar panels, at least they are putting them to good use — along with the disgusting lunches that are seemingly only fit for worms and compost.
Perhaps other schools should try this, or maybe just skip the middle man in the process, the student, and give the unappealing food directly to the worms.
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Now we can go out and eat worms!! Yum Yum Yum, Good news for health nuts and tree huggers alike!!!! We will save the planet! We will, we will. What's For Dinner?
This is a good news- bad news- good news article grouping. The last article will truly gives man hope for the future.....................................................................................................................
Eat Bugs, Improve Health, Save the Planet, Says UN
Monday, 24 November 2014 17:24 By Kristen Schepker | Assistant Editor
http://www.holisticprimarycare.net/topi ... ys-un.html
Scientists project that by 2050, the world's population will reach a staggering 9 billion people. Our growing presence will undoubtedly impact the health of the planet in untold ways, raising significant questions regarding land use, agricultural production, and food security.
Fried water bugsExperts suggest that sooner rather than later, we need to identify creative solutions to these upcoming ecological challenges. One solution, proposed by the United Nations and other environmental advocates, may be hard for some to swallow. Their suggestion? Eat more insects!
Indeed, there has been a lot of...ahem...buzz about insect-based foods lately, and while mainstream American palates may not quite be ready for edible bugs, products made with insect proteins have begun to enter the natural foods and healthy living markets in this country.
Throughout the world, an estimated 2 billion people regularly consume insects, a practice known as entomophagy. Plentiful, relatively easy to raise (or capture) and much less expensive than other animal based proteins, a host of insects and other bugs including spiders and scorpions are a regular part of traditional diets in many African, Asian, and Latin American cultures.
Grubs of the palm weevil, a species of snout beetle, are fried and eaten in several parts of western Nigeria (Banjo et al. Af J Biotech. 2006; 5(3): 298-301). In Thailand, insects are used as ingredients in dishes including chili paste and salads (Yhoung-Aree et al. Eco F Nut. 1997; 36(2-4): 133-149). In Japan, boiled wasp larvae are cooked with soy sauce, sugar, and sake and served mixed with rice.
In a 2013 report, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) identified over 1,900 species of edible insects. Worldwide, beetles are the most commonly eaten type. But the huge range of edible insects reflects the extraordinary biodiversity of insect species and includes caterpillars, bees, ants, grasshoppers, and termites, among many others.
Insect eating is nothing new; in fact, it's probably as old as humankind itself. It was certainly widely known in Biblical times. The Jewish Kosher laws defined in the Old Testament generally prohibit the eating of insects, with the exception of:
"Winged swarming things that go upon all fours, which have jointed legs above their feet, wherewith to leap upon the earth" (Leviticus 11:20).
The scripture goes on to define four types of locusts that may be considered kosher, though locusts are seldom found in the diets of orthodox Jews.
The New Testament does describe John the Baptist as living on "locusts and wild honey," but generally speaking, insect eating is relatively rare in Christian cultures. Islamic rulings vary, with some schools deeming certain types of insects Halal (permissible) but others deciding that insects as a category are Haram (forbidden).
The Biblical restrictions are likely a major underlying reason why eating insects is so rare in countries and cultures with Judeo-Christian roots. In the rest of the world, however, edible bugs are a part of normal everyday life.
Nutritional Value
One of the most compelling arguments for more widespread insect consumption is their remarkable nutritional value. The unique nutrient profiles of various insect types are influenced by a number of factors—species, metamorphic stage, habitat, diet, method of preparation—but generally speaking, they're packed with protein, fiber, healthy fats, and essential vitamins and minerals.
The FAO report notes that some bugs are arguably even more healthful than conventional animal products. The protein content of certain insects is higher than that of chicken, eggs, and beef. And mealworms contain unsaturated omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in amounts comparable to those found in fish—and higher than those in cattle and pigs.
Chitin, a macromolecular compound that constitutes 90% of insect skin, conveys nutritional as well as medicinal value—it can slow bleeding, prevent thrombus, and support the healing of wounds (Chen et al. Ent Res. 2009; 39(5): 299–303).
Environmental Implications
In recent decades, cultures throughout the world have adopted increasingly westernized diets, with an emphasis on red meat consumption. Experts argue that at current rates, meat production cannot keep pace with the demands of a growing global population. Adequate protein intake is already a major concern for the world's 1 billion chronically hungry people.
Insect farming could play a key role in addressing these challenges.
In addition to their human health benefits, insects are an exceptionally sustainable food source. Widely accessible and abundant on earth, they comprise up to 80% of the entire animal kingdom; the class insecta alone contains more species than all other animal classes combined!
Unlike conventional livestock farming, insect farming is inexpensive, produces very little waste, and is extremely energy-efficient. Insects reproduce rapidly, reach full body mass quickly, and require minimal space for production.
Relative to cattle farming, which requires huge amounts of grain, water, and other inputs, insect farming utilizes far fewer resources. As reported in a recent edition of National Geographic, for a given quantity of feed insect farmers can produce vastly more edible protein than can beef, poultry or pork farmers.
It takes roughly 100 pounds of animal feed to yield 10 pounds of beef. In contrast, 100 pounds of bug fodder can yield 45 pounds of edible crickets. Indeed, crickets are estimated to be 20 times more efficient than cattle as a source of protein.
Edible insects also produce significantly smaller quantities of greenhouse gas. Livestock farming is one of the largest global contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, a known cause of climate change. Because insect farming is much cleaner than cattle farming, "insects could serve as a more environmentally friendly alternative for the production of animal protein." (Oonincx at al. PLoS One. 2010; 5(12): e14445).
Eating more insects could also reduce pesticide use, as more efficient methods of harvesting pest species for food are developed (DeFoliart. Eco F Nut. 1997; 36(2-4): 109-132.).
Cricket powder protein shakes
While the thought of eating bugs intrigues some adventurous foodies, it's one that many others just can't stomach. It questions our core sense of what is—and isn't—appropriate to eat.
Insect-eating advocates suggest that westerners' psychological barrier to bug consumption is a learned, cultural one. From a young age, we're taught that insects are dirty and gross and should be removed from our home environments, especially from our kitchens.
With the right reframing, squeamish skeptics might be able to unlearn their cultural aversion to bugs as food. Proponents argue that eating insects is really no different from consuming other wildly popular edible invertebrates like crabs, lobsters, or shrimp.
They also question our perception of insects as dirty creatures. Several major categories of edible insects, including grasshoppers, beetle larvae, and moth and butterfly larvae, eat a diet of fresh plant leaves and wood— which is much cleaner and more hygienic than the decaying animal flesh eaten by crabs and lobsters, to say nothing of the questionable sanitary conditions at the massive feedlots or poultry farms where most of our cattle, pigs and chickens are raised.
Some brave and savvy food manufacturers have taken note of recent efforts to promote global insect consumption. Brooklyn-based Exo (produces high-protein food bars made from cricket flour. Similarly, another local company called Bitty also uses cricket flour as a main ingredient in its baked goods.
These companies have capitalized on the belief that bugs represent the future of healthy, sustainable food. If they're right, it may be only a matter of time until insect meal replaces protein powder in post-workout shakes and elsewhere in our diets.
The FAO has already issued a call to action, urging that, "what we eat and how we produce it needs to be re-evaluated. Inefficiencies need to be rectified and food waste reduced. We need to find new ways of growing food."
Eating bugs might just be one of those new ways.
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
OOPS. Bad news about eating bugs. Please say it isn't so.
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Eating Insects Isn’t as Eco-Friendly As People Say
* Mandy Oaklander @mandyoaklander
April 20, 2015
SHARE
Insects: Our Food Of The Future? Sean Gallup—Getty Images Dried grasshoppers, mealworms and crickets seasoned with spices
Crickets aren't so green after all
http://time.com/3824917/crickets-sustainable-protein/
Crickets are often trumpeted as the future of food, an edible, eco-friendly solution to a some-day protein shortage that livestock just can’t fix. Even the United Nations promotes insect-eating as a promising, protein-packed way to feed the 9 billion people that will live on earth in 2050. “A benefit of insects as an alternative animal protein source is that they can be reared sustainably on organic side streams (e.g. manure, pig slurry and compost),” their report reads.
Because insects emit far fewer greenhouse gases than livestock and consume way less water, they have a comparatively tiny ecological footprint, and they’re thought to thrive on basically anything, even organic waste. That last point sums up the main ecological appeal of eating insects; growing the grain used in animal feed takes up huge water and energy resources.
But do crickets really have the potential to be the new beef? Not yet, according to a new study published in the journal PLOS ONE. When researchers raised crickets on several different diets and tried to see how much protein they could squeeze out of them, they got some disappointing results: just not a whole lot of protein.
MORE: Why, On Second Thought, Maybe You Shouldn’t Start Eating Bugs
In the experiment, researchers raised crickets on one of five different diets. They replicated each diet three time and harvested the crickets after two weeks. One group ate corn-, soy- and grain-based feed, while others survived on food waste or crop residue. The researchers measured how big the crickets grew and how much edible protein they produced.
Diet made a huge difference, the study authors found. Those that ate a diet of processed food waste had a feed and protein conversion rates no more efficient than that of chickens. Nearly all those fed straight food waste died before they could be harvested. And the most successful crickets were those that ate a grain-based diet similar to what most poultry eat. They had a 35% protein conversion rate, which is only slightly better than chickens.
So even if the whole world took a page out of Mexico’s cookbook and developed an appetite for chapulines—crunchy fried crickets—the small protein payoffs may not even be worth it if we’re feeding them what chickens eat, the authors suggest.
“I think the sustainability claims on this topic have been overstated given the current state of knowledge,” wrote study author Dr. Mark Lundy of the University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources in an e-mail.
Even if they can’t survive on as many organic sidestreams as we originally thought, Lundy doesn’t think that insects are out of the running as the future of food.
“I’m all for exploring alternatives, and I am impressed by the amount of innovation that has sprung up around insect cultivation and cuisine in the last few years,” he says. “However, I also think we need to be clear-eyed about what the sustainability gains are and aren’t, and focus our innovative efforts and limited resources to where they will have the most lasting impact.”
Swapping chickens for crickets–while feeding them the same thing—is unlikely to make a real difference. “Insect cultivation is more likely to contribute to human nutrition at a scale of economic and ecological significance if it does not rely on a diet that competes with conventional livestock,” he says, “but more innovation is needed for this to become a reality.”
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
There is a God after all !!! Breaking :// Good news for bug eaters!! Time to wipe away those tears.
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
School Just Found a Unique New Way to Dispose of Michelle’s Uneaten Lunches… She’ll HATE It
chris 1 min ago No Comments
http://conservativeread.com/school-just ... l-hate-it/
First Lady Michelle Obama has attempted to use the coercive power of the federal government to literally force schools to serve “healthy” food for lunch that meets unrealistically strict nutritional guidelines.
Of course, kids being kids, many have rebelled against the lunches, and schools have been inundated with waste as kids simply throw away the unappetizing lunches rather than eat them.
Now one school in South Carolina has devised a way to make use of the disgusting lunches that are filling up their trashcans — by finding something that is hungry enough to eat anything without caring what it tastes like.
Lower Richland High School has created something of a recycling program for the lunch waste, using worms to create compost that is then used in their solar-powered school greenhouse to grow their own fresh vegetables for use in the school’s culinary program.
Students_unhappy_with_new_school_menus
School feeds uneaten Michelle O lunches to worms.
The 30-panel solar array, along with a massive food dehydrator into which the wasted food is placed before being fed to the worms, were purchased with the help of a mix of federal and private grants.
According to EAGNews, the project has already cut down on the school’s waste by 50 to 70 percent.
“Everyday, the cafeteria was throwing away food in the past that wasn’t eaten or served,” said Carroll Kelley, supervisor of the school’s program. “So, now we put the food in the food dryer.”
Kelley explained how the school used to see about 200 pounds of organic waste produced by the kids each week. Now, about 20 to 40 pounds of that reusable waste is collected each day, put into the dehydrator, then fed to the worms, which produce approximately 10 to 20 pounds of compost.
“All the food waste we’ve had, we’ve saved so much from it,” student project supervisor Nazaire Bethea said. “We’re doing something productive with it.”
This is a great idea, and while some may quibble over the school’s use of federal grants to purchase the dehydrator and solar panels, at least they are putting them to good use — along with the disgusting lunches that are seemingly only fit for worms and compost.
Perhaps other schools should try this, or maybe just skip the middle man in the process, the student, and give the unappealing food directly to the worms.
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Now we can go out and eat worms!! Yum Yum Yum, Good news for health nuts and tree huggers alike!!!! We will save the planet! We will, we will. What's For Dinner?
://.soundclick/band/page_music.cfm?bandID=178805
Google You tube Slacker G Guitar skills (1&2)
The same spirit that ruled over Hitler is headed our way.
Let those with ears to hear understand.
Google You tube Slacker G Guitar skills (1&2)
The same spirit that ruled over Hitler is headed our way.
Let those with ears to hear understand.
