General Music Chat

Paul the only conundrum I see with your argument is that you already are FREE from the likes of "my willie"

If he posts pornographic text replies on my posts then I am not free from him and he is trampling on the rights of others.

You only enslave yourself by becoming angry, with being involved with"my willie" With bandmix...

The Bible says be angry and sin not. I can not help being angry when he displays his most base, raw, and offensive garbage. But if you'll notice I didn't engage him negatively or positively. I didn't, as you say, get involved with him.

It is their problem and if it was that important or interfered with their ability to make money off their property I am certain they would stop it.

Yeah, and they did. Because he was infringing on their rights. His rights ended.

As far as everyones freedom ends when it interferes with the freedom of others... Well who is Godly enough to decide that?

It doesn't take Godly discernment to determine that someone is trampling rights. These types of laws are determined by people. People can understand these laws. It's pretty basic stuff. Do you need Godly discernment to know that your rights are being violated when someone takes something from you?

I don't think willie is a threat to anyone or their freedom. No one is forcing you to read his posts. If some one was forcing you to read them, that would be as bad as yelling fire in a crowded theater. Then you would have a very valid point.

He was posting pornographic relies to my posts. We deserve freedom from that filth.

I guess what I don't understand is why you are defending Mike as he continuously hunts down my posts to insult me, and now even George has made two rather insulting comments. (dey gotta stop herting my wddle feelings)LOL!

I'm defending Mike and George as I haven't seen them do anything wrong. Sorry if I missed you getting insulted. I am not here all the time.

I guess you feel it is OK for them to exercise their freedoms against my freedoms, because they have been appointed. That is the conundrum you have presented. Thank you for the opinion.

If you exercising your freedom tramples on the freedom of others then yes yours should be limited. I haven't seen that. But again I am not here all the time. Thanks for being nice in this exchange with me.