jw123 wrote:Paper you read up on any of the older bands and the significance of getting on say the Ed Sullivan show, it boosted the hell out of thier record sales.
MTV did the same thing, I read where David Coverdale said they got more exposure which transmitted to album sales for Whitesnake by being in rotation on MTV than they would have gotten touring a full year.
Well... yes and no... There were certain shows: I.e Ed Sulivan, Jack Par (and even Ted Mack, Johnny Carson) , which were deemed gateway shows. If you made it on those, the advertisers endorsed the affiliated radio stations with stipulations that their brands be associated with those acts...and such. To get to those shows, you really had to be special and very good. Those shows were not slave to any particular style of genre. You could say they were the Ellis Islands of performing arts.
So yes as a one shot deal, Ed Sullivan could temporarily send sales through the roof. It said that the acts were world class (and that's the pitch they used)
MTV pretty much abandoned the old brand of quality control in favor of television /Network production models (for obvious reasons). It necessarily meant the killing off of any old school music (in terms of 'art") to make room for innovative music in terms of Bandwidth signal, technical replication and other electronics what-nots. So in one sense, sales records reall depends on who you talk to.
Rememember Simon and Garfunkle? Nowhere to be found on MTV. (Though MTV did try, I think)
Bob Dylan? None to be found (But he still had great sales for a while)
MTV brought metal forward I think, better than any other genre. (or at least it seems that metal lasted the longest. And Because it dominated the Networks, Metal became the new priesthood of Rock. Every derivitive thereafter ensued...
While TV today helps boost sales. It does not necessarily mean that its pushing world class material. and it seems that a band only lasts about 2-3 years before those sales drop like a bad habit.