General Music Chat

politics aside...it's somewhat comforting to see that at the least everyone here is horrified by this shitbird's statements.

as to the liberal press leading everyone down the path.....get real people! jimmy already mentioned FAUX News but how about all the clowns beating the drum for the repubs....hannity, flush limburger, glen beck, ann coulter, and on and on...not to mentiion all the right wing "news sources" (glorified bloggers) who "report" (spin) the "news", "facts" and "statistics" that champion their views?

it works both ways from both sides. to deny that is pure folly.

I don't know what you're objecting to, that article looks fair and balanced.

The entire Page was Bought and paid for By Clinton. I'm sorry but that renders the Newspaper as accepting payment for political coverage. Its not even close to hard news... And we both know that the Clinton are notorious for press manipulation.

politics aside...it's somewhat comforting to see that at the least everyone here is horrified by this shitbird's statements.

as to the liberal press leading everyone down the path.....get real people! jimmy already mentioned FAUX News but how about all the clowns beating the drum for the repubs....hannity, flush limburger, glen beck, ann coulter, and on and on...not to mentiion all the right wing "news sources" (glorified bloggers) who "report" (spin) the "news", "facts" and "statistics" that champion their views?

it works both ways from both sides. to deny that is pure folly.

I do not disagree (re beating the drum- both sides) ..That why I stated before , today its Obamamedia, tomorrow its Romneymedia.

When Watergate occurred it was Nixon Media verses his Opponents Media... Anyway you slice it political /public image is bought and paid for. This doesn't even include the Salary and bennies that the White house Press Secretary receives.

All I am saying is that in political areana, we get fed what the White House wants us to eat...

"Once Again, you prove yourself to be completely ignorant. Its a FACT that Washington controls the major press. Wherever they cannot regulate press release in keeping with freedom of speech, they make up for by paying exorbitant amounts of money to press entities to play down or play up events."

It's a fact? Show me the link that backs up this "fact". If that were true, why is there a Fox News? Wouldn't they just shut those morons down? Why is the right so paranoid when it comes to the news? Could it be that you just don't like what is reported? Talk about ignorant, you wear the crown. Or should I say dunce cap?

That is YOUR OPINION JIMMY! Thats all it is YOUR OPINION and that doen't make it FACT. So should I wear my dunce cap on my MULLET?

Why is it when someone has an opposing opinion to you it makes them ignorant Jimmy? Why is that? You really do have a HIGH OPINION OF YOURSELF DON'T YOU? As we say in Texas "you ride a mighty high horse" me thinks your just riding a Shetland!

politics aside...it's somewhat comforting to see that at the least everyone here is horrified by this shitbird's statements.

as to the liberal press leading everyone down the path.....get real people! jimmy already mentioned FAUX News but how about all the clowns beating the drum for the repubs....hannity, flush limburger, glen beck, ann coulter, and on and on...not to mentiion all the right wing "news sources" (glorified bloggers) who "report" (spin) the "news", "facts" and "statistics" that champion their views?

it works both ways from both sides. to deny that is pure folly.

I do not disagree (re beating the drum- both sides) ..That why I stated before , today its Obamamedia, tomorrow its Romneymedia.

so, you don't see ANY Romneymedia now? forget that it's not coming from the white house. of course it's not. i'll give you that.....but you don't hear that there are just many drums being beaten out there by/for the conservatives? cos, man.....the drumming has been pretty loud on BOTH sides to my ears!

When Watergate occurred it was Nixon Media verses his Opponents Media...

exactly the point i was trying to make. there is and has always been both sides being presented and made available. even back in tricky dickie's day when there weren't a gazillion cable stations, "independent" news sources, bloggers, etc.

Anyway you slice it political /public image is bought and paid for. This doesn't even include the Salary and bennies that the White house Press Secretary receives.

no argument from me there. but really now....same as it ever was. same as...

All I am saying is that in political areana, we get fed what the White House wants us to eat...

and i hear you. yeah, we do. and we get fed what the right wing media serves as well. (or when a repub is in the white house the same formula happens in reverse)
face it, people form their their views based on both food services.

I don't know what you're objecting to, that article looks fair and balanced.

The entire Page was Bought and paid for By Clinton. I'm sorry but that renders the Newspaper as accepting payment for political coverage. Its not even close to hard news... And we both know that the Clinton are notorious for press manipulation.

Yeah, but every president and his government has participated in press manipulation. You'd be a fool not to. You're not going to tell the populace the actual truth. Heck, businesses large and small don't do that. You can't even get book authors to be honest about their books. They get their friends and family to write 5-star reviews for them so that people will go yeah and buy it, then go WTF?

This whole world participates in press and media manipulation, and honestly, we don't know the whole truth about anything until after the fact when knowing the truth no longer matters. And I laugh when people go on about how the particular news they read are unbiased because they aren't tied to anyone. Even they sensationalise facts and move sh*t around because they need readers. If they simply broadcasted facts as they were, no one would read their articles - especially when the same news story is being carried by all the other so-called truthful. Heck, being a business owner taught me that. PETA, who I absolutely despise, lies about facts, edit videos to make people believe animals are being abused when they aren't, the lying bastards.

Anyone who has had training in sales learns how to mindfuck people into buying their product. Look at how in the last 15 years, people have been suckered to think they have skin allergies to popular cosmetics? I mean, I make natural cosmetics and you wouldn't believe the amount of people who walk by my booth whining about how they can't smell or wear my products because they have allergies. I grabbed one lady and told her to try my lotion and if she could prove to me she was as sensitive as she said she was and produce a rash within a few hours, I'd give her $25. She came back and bought $35 worth of products from me. There wasn't sh*t wrong with that lady, she'd just been bamboozled by all those so-called "natural" products company to think she had allergies so she'd buy their products. My point is: why would the government be any different?

I just be honest and say that I don't know the entire truth of matters. I don't bother to behave like I'm in the know of everything and those who don't listen to me are stupid. No one knows the truth of anything unless they're in on those closed door meetings.

Chaeya

I just be honest and say that I don't know the entire truth of matters. I don't bother to behave like I'm in the know of everything and those who don't listen to me are stupid. No one knows the truth of anything unless they're in on those closed door meetings.

Chaeya

yep. THAT.

there's just waaaay too much filling in the blanks and making blanket assessments....and across the board snap judgements just to make your case when ya can't possibly know EXACTLY what went down.

"Once Again, you prove yourself to be completely ignorant. Its a FACT that Washington controls the major press. Wherever they cannot regulate press release in keeping with freedom of speech, they make up for by paying exorbitant amounts of money to press entities to play down or play up events."

It's a fact? Show me the link that backs up this "fact". If that were true, why is there a Fox News? Wouldn't they just shut those morons down? Why is the right so paranoid when it comes to the news? Could it be that you just don't like what is reported? Talk about ignorant, you wear the crown. Or should I say dunce cap?

That is YOUR OPINION JIMMY! Thats all it is YOUR OPINION and that doen't make it FACT. So should I wear my dunce cap on my MULLET?

Why is it when someone has an opposing opinion to you it makes them ignorant Jimmy? Why is that? You really do have a HIGH OPINION OF YOURSELF DON'T YOU? As we say in Texas "you ride a mighty high horse" me thinks your just riding a Shetland!

Well duh of course it's my opinion, who else's would it be? Besides, I think you're a little confused, it was Paperdog stating "it's a FACT". My fault, I thought anyone would be able to see where that quote came from.

"Once Again, you prove yourself to be completely ignorant. Its a FACT that Washington controls the major press. Wherever they cannot regulate press release in keeping with freedom of speech, they make up for by paying exorbitant amounts of money to press entities to play down or play up events."

It's a fact? Show me the link that backs up this "fact". If that were true, why is there a Fox News? Wouldn't they just shut those morons down? Why is the right so paranoid when it comes to the news? Could it be that you just don't like what is reported? Talk about ignorant, you wear the crown. Or should I say dunce cap?

That is YOUR OPINION JIMMY! Thats all it is YOUR OPINION and that doen't make it FACT. So should I wear my dunce cap on my MULLET?

Why is it when someone has an opposing opinion to you it makes them ignorant Jimmy? Why is that? You really do have a HIGH OPINION OF YOURSELF DON'T YOU? As we say in Texas "you ride a mighty high horse" me thinks your just riding a Shetland!

Well duh of course it's my opinion, who else's would it be? Besides, I think you're a little confused, it was Paperdog stating "it's a FACT". My fault, I thought anyone would be able to see where that quote came from.

You stated your belief that the right is so paranoid when it comes to the news. Well I am part of the right. I just think sometimes you get fact and YOUR OPINION confused! Thats all I was saying!

I'll have to dig it up but jut a few weeks ago an article was written by someone in the liberal press no less, which stated point blank the MSM and White House work in virtual tandem on how things are covered. It shocked a lot of conservatives that a lib would write it all out. So, yes, by its own admission in polling the main stream press is 90% liberal in its personnel, and that shows in the reporting. There was no Bush media, that is for sure. Nor will there be a Romney media should he win. No way. There was no Reagan media, nor Bush senior media, either, though Sr. is just a globalist and his whole gig basically went fine with the MSM.

There is no more unbiased investigative press anymore.