Dane Ellis Allen wrote:are you fascists saying then if a rich person is made destitute by an "Act Of God" an act the insurance company will not cover the loss then it's ok to let them now camp out under the freeway viaduct and shower in the local river because he's a "loser" now that his material wealth has been taken away?.. or do you help him like us liberals would do, cause "it's the right thing to do"..don't you muthafkkas have any sense of moral responsibility? to help your brother when and if that time comes? or has your hearts been hardened as Jesus said would happen in the last days..
Dane, I don't believe that one person on this forum would be so indifferent as to let any human being suffer under a bridge. But I do believe that such people who live under the bridge have clinical issues, which range from Drug addiction, Alcohol addiction, manic/Bi-polar depression, and other afflictions. Nobody in their 'right mind', who has strong self-efficacy would allow themselves to live under the bridge (no matter how poor they become... )...
SO , Here's the reality... Nobody, in general, wants to face or see a fallen human being...and they typically do not have the patience and/or skill to deal with another human being's afflictions.
Its most likely this way because they are "Soft Hearted" and can't stand the pain of dealing with the issues.
Hard-hearted people will throw a 20 dollar bill to a homeless fella...and then turn round and blame the guy for the ills of society... Hard -Hearted people will impose twisted humor and exploit the afflicted (Example: the Bum-Fights videos that floated around for a while) ... Hard hearted people will donate liquor and drugs to the homeless, and then charge them unimaginable fees to eat and get clothing...(See prostitutes)
Obama has policies that give the hard hearted a lot of breaks, and that rake the soft-hearted over the coals.. Nowhere in Obama's plans, are there any provision s for lifelong, meaningful support for the homeless.



