I have to agree with what AmericaUnitedRecords said (dude, you need a shorter name...lol). I think the contract is a great idea. However, in my experience, when I've mentioned contract to musicians, they run like a bunch of rabbits after a shotgun blast.
The most amazing (and frustrating) thing about music, in my opinion, is dealing with the individual personalities. Don't get me wrong, I believe in artistic statement, as well as everyone having free will and their own thoughts and ideas and quirks (I'm trying to say that I'm not a fascist and I don't strive for mind control over my fellow musicians...

).
But really, why is it so difficult to get a small group of people to work toward a common goal?
I have learned, at the inset of a new band, to line out the goals and reach an agreement on how to approach any and every situation. Before a single note is played, we say:
"We are at point A. We want to get to point B. This is how we are going to do it."
Seems like a pretty solid recipe to me. And yet, time after time, the plan is thrown off track and ultimately the project fails...all due to the fact that someone's ego is not getting properly stroked.
Being in a band maybe indeed be an issue of getting along...BUT being successful had NOTHING to do with getting along.
I've said it many times, and I believe it wholeheartedly...I could have a successful career in music right now if it weren't for having to rely on other people. I know I sound arrogant and bitter, but I really don't care. I think that everyone here has a pretty good idea to some extent how the music business works...The industry doesn't care if you and your bandmates are buddies. The industry doesn't care if you are getting equal input. The ONLY thing that the industry cares about is whether or not you can produce material that is going to make them money.
I'm sure that someone will respond to this, telling me I'm wrong, and that "being friends" with your bandmates is more important than anything. Fine. You can defend that point to the death-from your garage or basement or wherever you and your pals "jam". You sure won't be defending it from a major venue anytime soon.
There is a fine line between making everyone happy and reaching your goals. In any situation that arises, someone has to be objective, and (quoting Star Trek now...

). "The needs of many outweigh the needs of one".
For example: I have a situation right now where I have two guys basically doing the same thing. I don't need two guys doing the same thing. They both sing and play (rythym) guitar. I have one rythym guitar slot. One guy is obviously more qualified for that position. The other guy has other talents, such as playing the keys (he's not great, but he can carry his own). There are a couple of other reasons, such as material input that makes this decision pretty easy...except...
The second guy doesn't want to play keys. He wants to sing and strum a guitar. So rather than filling out the sound with a variety of instruments-one of our afforementioned goals, were going to have guitar overkill, just as long as guy #2 is happy.
OR, I could handle it like I have some business sense (and I do have a little), and tell guy #2 what we need him to do. If he doesn't like it, he doesn't have to come back. In the end, I'll either have a keyboard player or I'll be rid of an extra person that wasn't helping us reach our goals.
Does that sound cold hearted to you? It damn well should. I'm serious about what I do, and I'm not going to be held back by someone's selfishness.
I know that someone is probably gonna tell me that I make it sound like it's all about me and I'm the one being selfish. Simply not true. I'm about the band. I'm about reaching goals. However, as unfortunate as it may be, sometimes reaching those goals means that everyone doesn't always get what they want-including ME.
Sorry, band issues eating at me too...
