jimmydanger wrote:If you strive to be a musician for women, drugs, money, fame or a place in history you have already failed. The best music is done purely for the sake of music.
I agree in principle, but music is an interactive art. The audience is a part of the art. That makes it important for your music to connect with an audience. But it also makes it important that the music is honest.
I've always felt that the best musical performances communicate something to the audience of the musician that can't be communicated any other way. That connection, when well done, can be
very powerful in my experience.
A huge mistake I see musicians making, though, is to assume that to achieve that connection requires pandering to the lowest common denominator in the audience. It's certainly true that if you're trying to connect to a disco crowd and you're playing neo-progressive rock it's not going to work out, but I think any audience wants to be surprised a little.
For that disco crowd, play some hard-core James Brown as well as the Donna Summer stuff.
If you're playing all originals it's even harder because it's very easy to become self-indulgent. At that point, the art dies, IMO.
I've never been clear why, but in my experience the surest way for a musician to fail in all these things is to think of himself as an artist. Trying to be an artist kills their art.
You don't work music, you play it.
Discipline is not the enemy of fun.