If you can't do it live, then do something that you can do live.
There's something to be said for choosing material that you can do well as opposed to material you want to do but can't.
My interpretation was that when you said “live” you meant towards live performance not ability and that was further enforced by if you’re not playing live, it’s just because you lack the musical ability to do so. Given that context, I don’t think my response was overly sensitive, just massively incorrect. Clearly I did misunderstand and I apologize.
But the assumption that anything done in the studio can and will be faked, isn’t an entirely unfounded. I don’t play live, I don’t have videos of scheduled gigs, so who would know if I were just faking it all along? Combine it with the contrary side I’m taking on this subject and the assumption wouldn’t be far fetched.
I belonged to a song writing forum and there was one player who was absolutely amazing. I remember posting a tune I had done and it wasn’t the best it certainly had some flawed playing, but the chastisement I got wasn’t for not playing it well, it was for not editing it enough. The guy who I though was amazing asked me why I didn’t quantize it. He said he edited and quantized everything he did. Now had he not of said that I would have never of known, but it did sound really great. How do you know? There is nothing that can be played on keys, that can’t be generated on a DAW. Drummers have it much worse for studio demand. Unless I’m mistaken and no one here has ever used automated rhythm, or a drum machine on a recording?
In my area playing original music live means playing at an “open mike” for a crowd of six people. “Open Mike” being the code phrase for auditioning cover bands and selling beer while doing it. For independent original music, the internet is the only real avenue left available. The competition is going to be edited, quantized, heavily compressed and processed. Any effort spent in “keeping it real”, will just amount to keeping it really unnoticed. Do you think listeners today care if there is a reason that honest music is flawed? Go to any music site and pick the top ten off of their charts and what will you hear? Bob Dylan wouldn’t stand a snowball chance in hell today. It doesn’t make it right, it’s just the way it is. The perspective of just about everyone here is from that of a musician. The common listener today doesn’t contemplate the source of their music, just if it’s good/bad. Why should they? How much thought did they put into each and everyone of their downloads, for their three thousand song library?
Mike and I are trying to put something together but you can’t attract good talent if it sounds like garbage. So once again I will need a really good vocalists, to get a really good vocalists. I’ll need great drums, to get a good drummer. Because it’s an instant turn off, if the instrument you play isn’t represented well. No one listens to something off a profile and then says “Well I can do it better, so I should help them out”. If it’s not up to their standards, on to the next. It’s the opposite scenario, where eventually the crutch will be needed less, not more. Do I like the idea of fudging it to eventually achieve legitimacy? Absolutely not. The strangest part is as I play the devil’s advocate, I have yet to try the software. I guess it’s a line in the sand I’m not ready to cross yet. I’m still really undecided on how far I’m willing to go, to make it all work.
SirJamsaLot, lol No man, thanks for the compliment, but I’m goofy looking. Did you see that friggin ear? It’s a good thing there is a helmet law in New Jersey, or I’d be riding my bike in circles with the wind resistance.
